End of thread (was: Feature request)

The pissing match not relevant for postfix users. I'll kill subscriptions if if goes on like this. Wietse

Re: Two New Issues

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Douglas C. Stephens wrote: 1. No clue. I have no users that run Alpine. Douglas, Got it fixed. Set smtp-sender=localhost and that fixed the slowness. Whew! Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility Applied Ecosystem Services

Re: Feature request

mouss wrote: what version of grep do you use? http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7990989775/xcu/grep.html ... -q Quiet. Do not write anything to the standard output, regardless of matching lines. Exit with zero status if an input line is selected. ... That again begins to go offtopic

Re: Two New Issues

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Douglas C. Stephens wrote: Not really sure either of these are about Postfix. Douglas, Me, neither, but I want to eliminate it if appropriate. 1. No clue. I have no users that run Alpine. OK. 2. My mailbox servers don't use Qualcomm's qpopper, but this looks li

Re: Two New Issues

Rich, Not really sure either of these are about Postfix. Nevertheless... 1. No clue. I have no users that run Alpine. 2. My mailbox servers don't use Qualcomm's qpopper, but this looks like qpopper is having a cow about a corrupted inbox/spoolfile. Does her /var/spool/mail/ inbox file

Re: strict domains

bharathan kailath: > the following log in warning i could find: > > Jan 24 16:36:30 relay1 postfix/smtpd[13901]: warning: unknown smtpd > restriction: "smtpd_restriction_classes" > > how can i configure this correct ! Please follow instruction as given in the mailing list welcome message.

Two New Issues

I'm running postfix-2.5.2 on what is now Slackware-12.2. Had the system crash a week ago and, with udev and mkinitrd issues, it took until yesterday afternoon to get it back up and working properly. But, two issues mail are still to be resolved, and I need some advice on how to resolve them.

Re: Zone record set up

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 09:15:27AM +0100, mouss wrote: > >>IN MC 10 mail2.freewayprojects.com. > > > > This requirement was relaxed in RFC 2821. It is OK (though still > > better not to if not necessary) to use CNAMES. > > my understanding is that RFC 5321 "went back". at least, this is what

Re: forged spam mails

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, bharathan kailath wrote: > i get spam mails that pretend to be from yahoo (eg.from yahoo.it, yahoo.nl) > on my postfix relay; how can i prevent such kind of foregeries By pretend, do you mean the domain of the ENVELOPE SENDER is yahoo.com (or some other .tld), or that it is o

Re: strict domains

bharathan kailath a écrit : > the following i got from this userlist and i tried to implement it > without ful understanding > you need to read and understand http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html > Existing primitives can do this already. > The example stops mail from ya

Re: Postfix - Blackberry - opps, sorry if OT

postmas...@klam.ca wrote: > I don't currently own a blackberry, but am thinking about getting one > (the Obama effect). A friend who works in the Cellphone business has > warned me that if I just setup the BB to go get my email from my postfix > server this will treated as internet data, whereas if

Re: strict domains

Wietse wrote: > Transcript of session follows. > > Out: 220 relay1.xxx.xx ESMTP Postfix > In: HELO d60-143.icpnet.pl > Out: 250 relay1.xxx.xx > In: MAIL FROM: > Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok > In: RCPT TO: > Out: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration error > > Session aborted, reason: lost connection > >

strict domains

the following i got from this userlist and i tried to implement it without ful understanding Existing primitives can do this already. The example stops mail from yahoo.com/hotmail.com unless it comes from specific systems. Wietse smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/e

Re: To [ and ] or not to [ and ] in relayhost entries ...

mouss: > Noel Jones a ?crit : > > Thomas wrote: > >> Thomas Ackermann wrote: > >>> So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the > >>> use with and without the signs? > >>> I mean, what network things may happen or not happen? > >> > >> Nobody knows the technical differences?

Re: ipv6 address syntax in master.cf

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond: > Use the notation with the square brackets: > > [::1]:10028 > > They are used to differentiate the colon used for separaring the port, > as opposed to a colon which is part of the IPv6 address. The form [::1]:10028 is safe everywhere Postfix allows host:port. Postfi

Re: To [ and ] or not to [ and ] in relayhost entries ...

Noel Jones a écrit : > Thomas wrote: >> Thomas Ackermann wrote: >>> So, does anybody know what technically is the difference between the >>> use with and without the signs? >>> I mean, what network things may happen or not happen? >> >> Nobody knows the technical differences? >> >> :-( > > ... mor

Re: Feature request

Thomas a écrit : > mouss wrote: >> check_parameter() >> { >> postconf $1 2>&1 | grep -vq "unknown parameter" >> return $? >> } >> >> or >> >> check_parameter() >> { >> postconf $1 2>/dev/null | grep -q = >> return $? >> } >> > > Then, you need an exit-code wrapper for "grep" too, it see

Re: ipv6 address syntax in master.cf

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: Use the notation with the square brackets: [::1]:10028 They are used to differentiate the colon used for separaring the port, as opposed to a colon which is part of the IPv6 address. Olivier Thanks! byunghee

Re: ipv6 address syntax in master.cf

Use the notation with the square brackets: [::1]:10028 They are used to differentiate the colon used for separaring the port, as opposed to a colon which is part of the IPv6 address. Olivier -- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html - Original Message - From: "B

ipv6 address syntax in master.cf

hello, simple question. is that possible writing ipv6 address style in master.cf? if it is possible, which is correct syntax? [::1]:10028 inet (...) smtpd or ::1:10028 inet (...) smtpd byunghee

Re: forged spam mails

bharathan kailath a écrit : > i get spam mails that pretend to be from yahoo (eg.from yahoo.it > , yahoo.nl ) on my postfix relay; how > can i prevent such kind of foregeries when asking for help about fighting spam, it is a good idea to show what you are already

Re: Postfix - Blackberry [OT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: >as far as i know, blackberry platform works only with MS Exchange. > And it requires you to install some software with will be the > Blackberry-MS Exchange gateway . > >i dont know if blackberry gat

Re: +em...@example.com

Charles Marcus a écrit : > I'd love to see support for multiple delimeter characters... > > Also, gmail supports plus-addressing, as well as something else very > unique... you can add a '.' anywhere in the local part of your address, > and it is delivered as if the '.' wasn't there. This can be u

Re: Zone record set up

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:53:21PM +0100, mouss wrote: > >> wrong. >> >> the MX should not be a cname. see >> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-bogusmx.php >> >> use >> IN MC 10 mail2.freewayprojects.com. > > This requirement was relaxed in RFC 2821. It is O