On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:20:20 -0800
Evan Platt wrote:
> >When I send the mail, it just stays in the queue. The results of
> >mailq, tail /var/log/mail.log, and postconf -n are pasting below for
> >reference.
>
> From the laptop, what happens when you
> telnet smtp.gmail.com 25
>
>
> >I shall
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>
> > I noticed that on several occasions, and in the default master.cf:
> >
> > -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
> >
> > is suggested for the submission service. I'm not familiar with Milters
> > and can't fin
At 09:20 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
From the laptop, what happens when you
telnet smtp.gmail.com 25
My bad, this should be
telnet smtp.gmail.com 587
Please send your replies to the list, not to me.
At 09:58 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
>
>> From the laptop, what happens when you
>> telnet smtp.gmail.com 25
>
> telnet smtp.gmail.com 25
> Trying 66.249.93.109...
> Trying 66.249.93.111...
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refu
At 09:26 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
Quite the contrary -- they SHOULD be there in order to suppress
MX lookups of the relayhost name. See the documentation.
Huh. Yer right.
Never had that in my main.cf - never had a problem either. I added it
and reloaded.
Thanks for the edumacation :)
On Friday, January 09, 2009 at 06:20 CET,
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 08:56 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
[...]
> > relayhost = [smtp.gmail.com]
>
> Do you have the brackets in the main.cf? Not sure if that will cause
> a problem or not.
Quite the contrary -- they SHOULD be there in order to suppr
At 08:56 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
i have recently shifted to a different place.
Uhhh do you mean a new internet provider? Or something else?
I had a functioning postfix setup on my laptop but it is not working
in this new place.
I'm confused. Why are you running postfix on a laptop?
I use
i have recently shifted to a different place. I had a functioning
postfix setup on my laptop but it is not working in this new place.
I use gmail's smtp server to send e-mail.
Please note the following.
1. Internet works fine.
2. Evolution can send e-mail using the same smtp server account
3. I
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
> I noticed that on several occasions, and in the default master.cf:
>
> -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
>
> is suggested for the submission service. I'm not familiar with Milters
> and can't find information on what this is or what this does (at least
> in my s
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:07:07PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> While adding a feature I ran into a problem that is so old that I
> had to dig into my pre-alpha source code to find when it was
> introduced.
>
> Bugfix (introduced May 19, 1997): removing a parameter
> setting from mai
On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no
authentication is
required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
actually stop an authenticated user from sending mail throu
James D. Parra wrote:
> I am getting the following error when sending to the below mail server. I
> added the name of our internal relay server to our public dns and a ptr
> record, but I am still getting the error below.
>
>
> host mxi4p.craigslist.org[208.82.236.164]
> said: 554 5.7.1 : C
Hello,
I am getting the following error when sending to the below mail server. I
added the name of our internal relay server to our public dns and a ptr
record, but I am still getting the error below.
host mxi4p.craigslist.org[208.82.236.164]
said: 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected: rDNS/DNS
Wietse Venema wrote:
> While adding a feature I ran into a problem that is so old that I
> had to dig into my pre-alpha source code to find when it was
> introduced.
>
> Bugfix (introduced May 19, 1997): removing a parameter
> setting from main.cf did not reset the parameter to its
>
While adding a feature I ran into a problem that is so old that I
had to dig into my pre-alpha source code to find when it was
introduced.
Bugfix (introduced May 19, 1997): removing a parameter
setting from main.cf did not reset the parameter to its
default value. File: gl
mouss escribió:
> Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez a écrit :
>> Noel Jones escribió:
>>> [snip]
>>> Use 1-1 mappings. Use a little script and a Makefile to let the
>>> computer build the aliased domain from the real domain list you already
>>> maintain. Size of the table is not an issue.
>>>
>>> Your
Noel Jones a écrit :
> Cameron Camp wrote:
>> I have a Postfix setup which runs several mailman lists. I'm getting in
>> the headers:
>>
>> From: nore...@domain.com, r...@www.domain.com
>
> The From: header is text added by the mail client or your list
> processor. This isn't a postfix issue.
>
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
> Hi:
>
> Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus on this
> list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
> instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail clients.
>
> Once most of them move, I'd like to start warning
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Noel Jones escribió:
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Hello,
I don't want my mail queue to fill due to fake mail (spam) so I'd like to
reject as much mail as I could at the smtp stage (avoiding mail entering
into my queues). My setup is multi-domain (vdom
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> maddae...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm hoping for a little guidance with this. My apologies for not
>> doing a proper search on this first, but I'm a bit pressed for time.
>>
>> I've been asked to build a mail server for the purpose
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez a écrit :
> Noel Jones escribió:
>> [snip]
>> Use 1-1 mappings. Use a little script and a Makefile to let the
>> computer build the aliased domain from the real domain list you already
>> maintain. Size of the table is not an issue.
>>
>> Your postconf output looks OK
bijayant kumar a écrit :
> My question is, spammers forges the from address and sends the spam where
> from address and to address are same. Like in my case I am getting the spam
> mails from bijay...@kavach.com to bijay...@kavach.com. So, I googled and
> found that after reject_unauth_destinati
Noel Jones escribió:
> Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I don't want my mail queue to fill due to fake mail (spam) so I'd like to
>> reject as much mail as I could at the smtp stage (avoiding mail entering
>> into my queues). My setup is multi-domain (vdomains) and it's working
>
maddae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm hoping for a little guidance with this. My apologies for not
doing a proper search on this first, but I'm a bit pressed for time.
I've been asked to build a mail server for the purpose of sending mail
from various machines within a LAN to anywhere on the
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Hello,
I don't want my mail queue to fill due to fake mail (spam) so I'd like to
reject as much mail as I could at the smtp stage (avoiding mail entering
into my queues). My setup is multi-domain (vdomains) and it's working
reasonably well for my hosted domain
Hello,
I don't want my mail queue to fill due to fake mail (spam) so I'd like to
reject as much mail as I could at the smtp stage (avoiding mail entering
into my queues). My setup is multi-domain (vdomains) and it's working
reasonably well for my hosted domains ("real") but not for those being
"al
Hi All,
I'm hoping for a little guidance with this. My apologies for not
doing a proper search on this first, but I'm a bit pressed for time.
I've been asked to build a mail server for the purpose of sending mail
from various machines within a LAN to anywhere on the Net. I'm
guessing that this
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 14:02 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
[ snip ]
> >
> > Hey! That did the trick!
> >
> > Thanks for the help. Can you explain me why is it a problem if it si an
> > external MTA?
> >
> >
> > Martín
> >
>
> Because any sender not equal to example.com will be reject.
>
> You
Noel Jones said the following on 01/08/2009 10:34 AM:
Postfix keeps idle processes around for $max_idle (default 100s), so
the process count is only an approximation of the number of
connections. Idle processes are reused $max_use (default 100) times
before they are retired. The number of pro
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:53:45 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
>
>> Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no authentication is
>> required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
>> actually stop an authenticated user from se
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Martin Spinassi
wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Spinassi
>> wrote:
>> > main.cf:
>> >
>> > smtpd_sender_restrictions=
>> >check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
>> >
john.swilt...@wanadoo.fr a écrit :
Martin Spinassi a écrit :
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Spinassi
wrote:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions=
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
reject
s/check_c
Martin Spinassi a écrit :
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions=
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
reject
s/check_client_access/check_sender_access/
b
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Bas van Reeuwijk wrote:
> Am I correct in understandig that I should set null_sender to empty in the
> pipe command to my content filter, because the default is set to
> 'MAILER-DAEMON'?
Yes.
> Currently my filter entry in the master.cf is as follows:
>
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:25:33AM -0500, Brian Collins wrote:
> > So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
> > postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
> > centos 5
>
> Wietse does not release any RPM versions of Postfix. As you can imagine
Cameron Camp wrote:
I have a Postfix setup which runs several mailman lists. I'm getting in
the headers:
From: nore...@domain.com, r...@www.domain.com
The From: header is text added by the mail client or your list
processor. This isn't a postfix issue.
and also:
Return-Path: www-d...@ww
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Well, there ARE enough processes as is. Your server is very low
> volume it seems.
>
> > I ran the command on watch and the output never changes however postfix
> > is processing about 5 messages per minute. Why am I getting different
> > results? Is this a configuration
Cory Coager wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt said the following on 01/08/2009 08:39 AM:
* Cory Coager :
I'm attempting to generate some rrd graphs to track MTA connections for
postfix. With sendmail it was possible to do this by greping the ps
list for the number of sendmail processes. How would I
* Cory Coager :
> Unfortunately its not working.
>
> # ps auxwww|grep "smtp -n"
> postfix 16747 0.0 0.0 3728 1172 ?S10:08 0:00 smtp -n
> pmx -t unix -u
> postfix 18905 0.0 0.0 3728 1160 ?S10:21 0:00 smtp -n
> pmx -t unix -u
>
> The version installed is 2
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
grep for the smtp processes (not smtpd)
(or vice versa)
The number of smtp processes never changes so this won't work.
Why ask if you know better? Of course it changes.
mail-ausfall:~# ps auxwww|grep "smtp -n" |wc -l
6
mail-ausfall:~# ps auxwww|
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> >> grep for the smtp processes (not smtpd)
> >> (or vice versa)
>
> > The number of smtp processes never changes so this won't work.
>
> Why ask if you know better? Of course it changes.
mail-ausfall:~# ps auxwww|grep "smtp -n" |wc -l
6
mail-ausfall:~# ps auxwww|grep "smt
* Cory Coager :
>>> I'm attempting to generate some rrd graphs to track MTA connections for
>>> postfix. With sendmail it was possible to do this by greping the ps
>>> list for the number of sendmail processes. How would I accomplish this
>>> on postfix?
>>>
>>
>> grep for the smtp processe
Ralf Hildebrandt said the following on 01/08/2009 08:39 AM:
* Cory Coager :
I'm attempting to generate some rrd graphs to track MTA connections for
postfix. With sendmail it was possible to do this by greping the ps
list for the number of sendmail processes. How would I accomplish this
on p
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
> Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no authentication is
> required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
> actually stop an authenticated user from sending mail through port 25.
> If they tried to authenticate on
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 12:10 AM:
Hi:
Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus
on this
list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail
> So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
> postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
> centos 5
Wietse does not release any RPM versions of Postfix. As you can imagine,
keeping that up for all the RPM-based distros would be quite a feat.
How
Chris Babcock wrote, at 01/08/2009 03:19 AM:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:10:57 -0800
> Jeff Weinberger wrote:
>
>> 1) using the controls in postfix, is it possible to prevent
>> authenticated
>> users from using port 25 to submit mail? Is there a construct that
>> would do
>> that without interfe
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:59:54AM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> >
> > You can just refuse them: put "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" in your
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions -- assuming the typo domain has no A nor MX
> > record, yo
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Spinassi
> wrote:
> > main.cf:
> >
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions=
> >check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
> >reject
> >
>
> s/check_client_access/check_sender_access/
>
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 12:10 AM:
> Hi:
>
> Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus on this
> list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
> instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail clients.
>
> Once most of them move, I'd l
* Cory Coager :
> I'm attempting to generate some rrd graphs to track MTA connections for
> postfix. With sendmail it was possible to do this by greping the ps
> list for the number of sendmail processes. How would I accomplish this
> on postfix?
grep for the smtp processes (not smtpd)
(or vice
I'm attempting to generate some rrd graphs to track MTA connections for
postfix. With sendmail it was possible to do this by greping the ps
list for the number of sendmail processes. How would I accomplish this
on postfix?
~Cory Coager
--
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Spinassi wrote:
> main.cf:
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions=
>check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
>reject
>
s/check_client_access/check_sender_access/
but this a problem if is a external MTA.
>
> Martín
>
>
--
Reinaldo de Carvalho
h
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 07:54 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Martin Spinassi:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm trying to install a postfix with some restrictions, including a
> > sender restriction, but I'm just missing something.
> >
> > The idea is to allow o
Martin Spinassi:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi list!
>
> I'm trying to install a postfix with some restrictions, including a
> sender restriction, but I'm just missing something.
>
> The idea is to allow only one domain to send mails from that server, but
> I'm having access d
> > It's doing what you're asking... "REJECT"
> > means bounce the message. You
> > probably want to "DISCARD" it.
> >
> DISCARD means nobody will receive the bounce message, right? If any
> bodies mails is rejected from our server he/she will never know what
> was the issue.
Right, which is wh
Hi list!
I'm trying to install a postfix with some restrictions, including a
sender restriction, but I'm just missing something.
The idea is to allow only one domain to send mails from that server, but
I'm having access denied including the domain that is supposed to be
allowed.
Here is what I g
Bijayant Kumar
--- On Thu, 8/1/09, Chris Babcock wrote:
> From: Chris Babcock
> Subject: Re: Blocking Spam
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Cc: bijayan...@yahoo.com
> Date: Thursday, 8 January, 2009, 2:13 PM
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:30:06 -0800 (PST)
> bijayant kumar wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
Hi Victor,
Thanks again for you help. I really appreciate the time and effort you put
in helping and educating me.
I've succesfully upgraded to postfix 2.5.6 this morning.
I'm still a bit confused about your remarks regarding the "null_sender="
parameter.
Am I correct in understandig that I sho
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:26:57AM +0800, tony liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When my customers send mails with nonsexist domain(sometimes maybe typo
> error, EX. u...@hotmail.org ), these mails will be rejected and in queue for
> a long time(normally 5 days), Is there a way for postfix to remove these
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:30:06 -0800 (PST)
bijayant kumar wrote:
>
>
> Bijayant Kumar
>
>
> --- On Tue, 6/1/09, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> > From: DJ Lucas
> > Subject: Re: Blocking Spam
> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Date: Tuesday, 6 January, 2009, 2:00 PM
> > bijayant kumar wrote:
> > > Bij
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:10:57 -0800
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
> 1) using the controls in postfix, is it possible to prevent
> authenticated
> users from using port 25 to submit mail? Is there a construct that
> would do
> that without interfering with incoming mail from anywhere?
Your smtpd_recip
62 matches
Mail list logo
