Re: /etc/aliases.db - invalid argument

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:33:28PM -0500, v0id null wrote: > Tried to rebuild aliases.db with postalias, nada > Tried BDB v4.2 and v4.1, nada Please expand "nada" into a meaningful english sentence. Usually "invalid argument" in this context means that the ".db" file is not a compatible database

Problem resolved - two newaliases

one in /usr/bin one in /usr/local/bin Ran /usr/local/bin/newaliases and problem was resolved. I hope this gets indexed by search engines because this took a few days for me to solve heh

Re: /etc/aliases.db - invalid argument

Well, no. But when I recompiled postfix, the freebsd port grabbed db 4.1 and installed it Hash shows up in postconf -m $ postconf -m btree cidr environ hash mysql pcre proxy regexp static unix On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Terry Carmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > v0id null wrote: >> >> Trie

Re: /etc/aliases.db - invalid argument

v0id null wrote: Tried to rebuild aliases.db with postalias, nada Tried BDB v4.2 and v4.1, nada FreeBSD 6.3 Postfix v2.5.4 bdb 4.1.25 Maillog: Nov 18 23:43:01 sloshed postfix/smtpd[60929]: fatal: open database /etc/aliases.db: Invalid argument Nov 18 23:43:02 sloshed postfix/master[54129]: warn

/etc/aliases.db - invalid argument

Tried to rebuild aliases.db with postalias, nada Tried BDB v4.2 and v4.1, nada FreeBSD 6.3 Postfix v2.5.4 bdb 4.1.25 Maillog: Nov 18 23:43:01 sloshed postfix/smtpd[60929]: fatal: open database /etc/aliases.db: Invalid argument Nov 18 23:43:02 sloshed postfix/master[54129]: warning: process /usr/l

Re: multiple recipient_delimiters?

Victor Duchovni: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:24:02PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > > currently i have > > recipient_delimiter = + > > > > which i use for automatic mail filtering into different maildir > > folder. > > > > however, lots of websides dont know that a + in the address is a >

Re: anvil and ip exclusions

Jake Vickers: > Is there a way to exclude an IP/range from anvil? I have a mail server > where 95% of the users are on the same IP (not local to mail server) and > they're triggering anvil 10+ times a day for that IP address. > Or is there a different way to work around this? See: http://www.po

Re: multiple recipient_delimiters?

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:24:02PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > currently i have > recipient_delimiter = + > > which i use for automatic mail filtering into different maildir > folder. > > however, lots of websides dont know that a + in the address is a > valid character and dont allow it.

multiple recipient_delimiters?

currently i have recipient_delimiter = + which i use for automatic mail filtering into different maildir folder. however, lots of websides dont know that a + in the address is a valid character and dont allow it. They think the . is the character to have in the local part of the email. arguing

anvil and ip exclusions

Is there a way to exclude an IP/range from anvil? I have a mail server where 95% of the users are on the same IP (not local to mail server) and they're triggering anvil 10+ times a day for that IP address. Or is there a different way to work around this? Thanks.

Re: always_bcc problem

Xueron Nee: > Hi, > > I'm using `always_bcc` to backup all my messages to a monitor user, and it > works fine. > > My problems is: if a message was sent to more than one recipients, the > message will > bcc to the monitor user several copies. > > I just hope to backup every messages only onc

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

Ville Walveranta a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You have different lookup types in the same table. The pcre line goes in a >> second lookup table (i.e., virtual_alias_maps.pcre) added to >> virtual_alias_maps: >> >> virtual_alias_maps = >

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have different lookup types in the same table. The pcre line goes in a > second lookup table (i.e., virtual_alias_maps.pcre) added to > virtual_alias_maps: > > virtual_alias_maps = >hash:${config_directory}/t

always_bcc problem

Hi, I'm using `always_bcc` to backup all my messages to a monitor user, and it works fine. My problems is: if a message was sent to more than one recipients, the message will bcc to the monitor user several copies. I just hope to backup every messages only once, is there any way to make it?

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

Ville Walveranta a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /^(info|sales|test1)@fourthdomain\.com$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I'm not having luck with that. > > I put... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: /^(info|sales|test1)@fourthdomain\.com$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not having luck with that. I put... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^(user1|user2)@fourthdomain\.com$/

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

ACL Policy Daemon for Postfix might do the trick without me having to write the policy daemon myself. It provides numerous ACL methodsand Regex ACLs . Ville

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

Ville Walveranta a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Use a pcre map to return the local part @someotherdomain.com: >> >> /^(.+)@fourthdomain\.com$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Where would you put that pcre map? depends on what you want to do with th

Re: sender_bcc, recipient_bcc, double messages: Need some help

Wietse Venema schrieb: > Please see FILTER_README and search for receive_override_options. Robert Krig: > I did. But my problem is, that I'm not sure where to put that statement. FILTER_README provides examples for several filter configurations. It is up to you to recognize which configuration ma

Re: sender_bcc, recipient_bcc, double messages: Need some help

Wietse Venema schrieb: > Please see FILTER_README and search for receive_override_options. > > Wieste > I did. But my problem is, that I'm not sure where to put that statement.

Re: sender_bcc, recipient_bcc, double messages: Need some help

Please see FILTER_README and search for receive_override_options. Wieste

Re: Evolution unable to login mail server.

Stephen Liu wrote: > Following is the mail.log reporting the failure of login to download > mails. IMAP is running here. > Are you still having issues with SASL integration with Postfix? This list does not support IMAP clients since it is the Postfix list and not the (Cyrus|Dovecot|other) IMAP

Re: Postfix's SMTP outbound mail filtering of header content

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:24:38PM +, Charles Account wrote: > I am running Postfix with zimbra, our milter checks for specific > content, etc.If it exists, it is allowed to be delivered to the local > lmtp queues, however,as for company policy, it must be run through a > black box service bef

Re: Forward one user with address rewriting

To redirect one without changing the recipient address: /etc/postfix main.cf: transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport /etc/postfix/transport: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp:mx.b.example.com Many years ago I tried to unify virtual aliasing and transport mapping into one table, but I gave u

RE: Postfix's SMTP outbound mail filtering of header content

> Subject: Re: Postfix's SMTP outbound mail filtering of header content> To: > postfix-users@postfix.org> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:35:20 -0500> From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wietse:>> As documented, smtp_header_checks etc. cannot > change the destination.>> >> Destination changes would not make

sender_bcc, recipient_bcc, double messages: Need some help

Hi guys. I need some help. I've setup postfix to use sender_bcc_maps and recipient_bcc_maps so that only one of the virtual domains which we host, is forwarded to a backup account. The sender_bcc and recipient_bcc statements are in the main.cf The problem, as so many have posted before, is that

Forward one user with address rewriting

Hi folks. I'm running postfix 2.5.1-2ubuntu1.2 on Ubuntu 8.04. I think I understand postfix admin pretty well, but I have one question I don't know how to solve. I have two machines running postfix and delivering mail locally. Call them m1.sub1.example.com and m2.sub2.example.com. Most peo

Re: TLS and Avast anti-virus

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:32:32 -0500 brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A client who uses Windows/Thunderbird is reporting the following error > when attempting to connect to her INBOX: > > "TLS not supported by avast mail scanner." > She needs to disable mail-scanning in Avast.

Re: TLS and Avast anti-virus

brian wrote: > "TLS not supported by avast mail scanner." > > I'm using Postfix with Cyrus-IMAP. I realise that this isn't really > Postfix-specific but hope that someone might know of a work-around for > this (aside from getting rid of Avast). I don't use Avast (nor Windows) > so don't really kno

Re: Virtual canonical domains?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Use a pcre map to return the local part @someotherdomain.com: > > /^(.+)@fourthdomain\.com$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where would you put that pcre map? I tried few different patterns in check_recipient_access in smtpd_recipient