Udv / Greetings!
I did not have sysctl compiled in the kernel. that one caused the
problem. (the old .config become incmpatible with the new one and I
havent chacked is all options are in place)
I don't know what the affect of sysctl to postfix, but definately has.
Sunday, November 2, 2008, 3:34:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Terry Carmen wrote:
> >The destination system is not Postfix. The sending system is experiencing
> >connection problems. We don't know anything about configured concurrency
> >limits, volumes, ... the OP has provided only minimal information.
>
> Sorry, I
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Is there any chance you could get them to try installing something like
fail2ban, which can block connections from IPs that are doing the
dictionary attacks?
Trying to fix postfix to handle a DOS attack would seem to be more
difficult than preventing it in the first pla
Le 3 nov. 08 à 20:24, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
you need both redirect (to other alias and to mailbox) in
virtual_alias_maps, reading your postconf i would suggest the
following lines :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:33:47PM -0500, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Is there any chance you could get them to try installing something like
> fail2ban, which can block connections from IPs that are doing the
> dictionary attacks?
>
> Trying to fix postfix to handle a DOS attack would seem to be mor
Vintinner, M. Scott wrote:
One of our very important clients (a major bank), is having ongoing
problems with denial-of-service style dictionary SPAM attacks. Their
anti-spam/firewall teams are slow to respond to these outbreaks, so
there may be periods of several hours where we will get frequen
M. wrote, at 11/03/2008 03:41 PM:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:26 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> Although checking the MX record before provisioning would provide the
>> ultimate verification, it would expose the domain to the possibility of
>> lost mail, since it requires the customer to change the MX
M.:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:26 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> > Although checking the MX record before provisioning would provide the
> > ultimate verification, it would expose the domain to the possibility of
> > lost mail, since it requires the customer to change the MX before the
> > destination
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:41:17PM +0100, M. wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:26 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> > Although checking the MX record before provisioning would provide the
> > ultimate verification, it would expose the domain to the possibility of
> > lost mail, since it requires the cust
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:26 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Although checking the MX record before provisioning would provide the
> ultimate verification, it would expose the domain to the possibility of
> lost mail, since it requires the customer to change the MX before the
> destination is ready to ac
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:26:20PM -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Although checking the MX record before provisioning would provide the
> ultimate verification, it would expose the domain to the possibility of
> lost mail, since it requires the customer to change the MX before the
> destination is rea
Wietse Venema wrote, at 11/03/2008 03:06 PM:
> M.:
>> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:32 +0100, mouss wrote:
>>> and the problem is? If they "control the domain", then you have no problem!
>> OK, I will try to explain that by example:
>>
>> 0. user buys domain mydomain.com
>>
>> 1. user adds mx record mai
M. wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:32 +0100, mouss wrote:
and the problem is? If they "control the domain", then you have no problem!
OK, I will try to explain that by example:
0. user buys domain mydomain.com
1. user adds mx record mailserver.com to his domain
2. user adds (by perl script)
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:02:59PM -0800, Jay Chandler wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> >
> >smtp-finger: Connected to wec-imail1.wachovia.com[169.200.91.91]:25
> >smtp-finger: < 220 wec-imail1.wachovia.com ESMTP Ready.
> >smtp-finger: > EHLO hqmtaint02.ms.com
>
M.:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:32 +0100, mouss wrote:
> > and the problem is? If they "control the domain", then you have no problem!
>
> OK, I will try to explain that by example:
>
> 0. user buys domain mydomain.com
>
> 1. user adds mx record mailserver.com to his domain
>
> 2. user adds (by
On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
smtp-finger: Connected to wec-imail1.wachovia.com[169.200.91.91]:25
smtp-finger: < 220 wec-imail1.wachovia.com ESMTP Ready.
smtp-finger: > EHLO hqmtaint02.ms.com
smtp-finger: < 250-wec-imail1.wachovia.com Hello hqmtaint02.ms.com
[205.228.53
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> > you need both redirect (to other alias and to mailbox) in
> > virtual_alias_maps, reading your postconf i would suggest the
> > following lines :
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
M. wrote, at 11/03/2008 01:51 PM:
> 4. user can add *any* domain he wants to my postfix's virtual domains
> maps by perl script. If that particular domain is listed in virtual
> domains maps postfix will not check MX record. I want to avoid it. I
> need to force postfix to use DNS before checking
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:12:35 +0100
ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 3 nov. 08 à 12:02, Nicolas Letellier a écrit :
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > I would like to have this possibility in postfix :
> >
> > I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a mailbox (pop or imap), and it's TOO
> > an alias (to [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:32 +0100, mouss wrote:
> and the problem is? If they "control the domain", then you have no problem!
OK, I will try to explain that by example:
0. user buys domain mydomain.com
1. user adds mx record mailserver.com to his domain
2. user adds (by perl script) entry to vi
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:44:50PM -0400, Vintinner, M. Scott wrote:
> The result is that some really unlucky messages end up being delayed by
> an hour or more. In the meantime, the client receives messages from
> other companies with only minor delays, so the client and my boss both
> blame our
M. wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 13:07 -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
You also don't specify if this is virtual_alias_domains or
virtual_mailbox_domains.
virtual_mailbox_domains and virtual_alias_maps.
Personally, I would never allow users to add domains simply because of
the proble
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:42:59PM -0400, Vintinner, M. Scott wrote:
> When their servers are experiencing an "outage" , I see:
>
> Oct 28 09:24:41 mta1 postfix/smtp[24419]: connect to
> wec-imail1.bank.com[xxx.xxx.91.91]: Connection refused (port 25)
Connection refused is not what you would exp
Goet, Kees wrote:
One of our customers, who is a reviewer with a magazine, has the
following email-account with this magazine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
however she uses her company-address as from-address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now she sends me an email from the account she has with
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 13:07 -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> You also don't specify if this is virtual_alias_domains or
> virtual_mailbox_domains.
virtual_mailbox_domains and virtual_alias_maps.
> Personally, I would never allow users to add domains simply because of
> the problems you
M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to perform dns query before checking domains maps?
>
> My users can add entries to virtual domains map and alias maps. I want
> to avoid scenario that someone adds gmail.com domain and catch outbound
> mails for gmail.com.
>
Fix the addition script/process
Dave Buchanan (Abo Ltd) wrote:
Dear postfix users
I have re-configured our postfix mailservers to remove catch all aliases to remove the ammount of mail accepted.
I know have one more issue to resolve with respect to non delivery
notifications - backscatter
the setup is as follows
[EMAIL P
Hello,
is it possible to perform dns query before checking domains maps?
My users can add entries to virtual domains map and alias maps. I want
to avoid scenario that someone adds gmail.com domain and catch outbound
mails for gmail.com.
Second solution I figured out is to make relay_host to oth
Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reload postfix. Problem remains.
> # tail /var/log/mail.log
> Nov 3 17:06:13 xen03 postfix/postfix-script[1778]: refreshing the
> Postfix mail system
> Nov 3 17:06:13 xen03 postfix/master[1144]: reload configuration
> /etc/postfix
> Nov 3 17:07:03 xen03
--- Brian Evans - Postfix List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Liu wrote:
> > Nov 3 15:50:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1574]: fatal: open
> > /etc/postfix/virtual/mysql-relay-domains.cf: Not a directory
> > Nov 3 15:50:45 xen03 postfix/qmgr[1575]: fatal: open
> > /etc/postfix/virtual/mysql-relay
Zitat von "Dave Buchanan (Abo Ltd)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear postfix users
I have re-configured our postfix mailservers to remove catch all
aliases to remove the ammount of mail accepted.
I know have one more issue to resolve with respect to non delivery
notifications - backscatter
t
Dave Buchanan (Abo Ltd) wrote, at 11/03/2008 10:32 AM:
> Dear postfix users
>
> I have re-configured our postfix mailservers to remove catch all aliases to
> remove the ammount of mail accepted.
>
> I know have one more issue to resolve with respect to non delivery
> notifications - backscatte
Stephen Liu wrote:
> Nov 3 15:50:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1574]: fatal: open
> /etc/postfix/virtual/mysql-relay-domains.cf: Not a directory
> Nov 3 15:50:45 xen03 postfix/qmgr[1575]: fatal: open
> /etc/postfix/virtual/mysql-relay-domains.cf: Not a directory
>
Fix this error, post 'postconf -n'
Hi folks,
Debian Etch
Postfix
MySQL
Fail to telnet
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain.
Escape character is '^]'.
ehlo localhost
Nothing printed out.
# tail /var/log/mail.log
Nov 3 15:49:45 xen03 postfix/master[1144]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/
* "Dave Buchanan (Abo Ltd)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what happens to an e-mail that has spam / virus etc from
>
> Mail is accepted by our servers for delivery and then passed on to [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> The demon.net mailserver rejects this mail with a 550 error
> our mailserver then
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Chojecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i want to redirect all messages sent to exact "external" email addres
> to my "internal" addres - i use header_checks and REDIRECT action
>
> When external addres is in TO: field - action is taken.
> When exter
Dave Buchanan (Abo Ltd) wrote:
Dear postfix users
I have re-configured our postfix mailservers to remove catch all aliases to remove the ammount of mail accepted.
I know have one more issue to resolve with respect to non delivery
notifications - backscatter
the setup is as follows
[EMAIL P
Goet, Kees wrote:
>
>
>
> The mail-headers contain:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> But, in the Postfix logfile I see:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> This gives problems with SP
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL wrote:
Dear All,
As of lately we are getting more and more ldap lookup timeouts during
the day
Nov 3 12:44:59 servername postfix/proxymap[31451]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error -5: Timed out
Nov 3 12:45:09 servername postfix/proxymap[28685]:
Dear postfix users
I have re-configured our postfix mailservers to remove catch all aliases to
remove the ammount of mail accepted.
I know have one more issue to resolve with respect to non delivery
notifications - backscatter
the setup is as follows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (d
One of our customers, who is a reviewer with a magazine, has the
following email-account with this magazine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
however she uses her company-address as from-address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now she sends me an email from the account she has with the magazine:
Hello,
i want to redirect all messages sent to exact "external" email addres
to my "internal" addres - i use header_checks and REDIRECT action
When external addres is in TO: field - action is taken.
When external addres is in CC: and BCC field - email
is sent to external MX.
My header_checks loo
Dear All,
As of lately we are getting more and more ldap lookup timeouts during
the day
Nov 3 12:44:59 servername postfix/proxymap[31451]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error -5: Timed out
Nov 3 12:45:09 servername postfix/proxymap[28685]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup: Search error -5: T
> > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: warning: unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]: SASL LOGIN
> > > authentication failed: authentication failure
> >
> > I do get those all the time. Users mistyping their passwords,
> > usernames, client's getting AUTH all wrong and so on.
>
> OK.
>
> > > then
> > >
> > > postfix/sm
Gabriele Di Giambelardini wrote:
Ok, I used that directive, now my postconf -n is this:
[snip]
daemon started -- version 2.3.8, configuration /etc/postfix
Nov 3 14:05:44 hosting postfix/smtpd[31371]: fatal: parameter
"smtpd_recipient_restrictions": specify at least one working instance of:
che
Ok, I used that directive, now my postconf -n is this:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases,ldap:aliases
config_directory = /etc/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
default_destination_concurrency_limit = 50
double_bounce_sender = postmaster
forward_path = $home/.forward
home
On Mon, November 3, 2008 11:22 am, Toni Van Remortel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Avoid stating problems and goals in terms of solutions (think in the
> > "problem domain", not in the "solution domain"). I am certain you don't
> > care about transports. what you want is the message to be delivere
ML wrote:
Le 3 nov. 08 à 12:02, Nicolas Letellier a écrit :
Hello.
I would like to have this possibility in postfix :
I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a mailbox (pop or imap), and it's TOO an
alias (to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
When a mail is sent for [EMAIL PROTECTED], the mail must arrive in user
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I would like to have this possibility in postfix :
I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a mailbox (pop or imap), and it's TOO an alias
(to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
virtual_alias_maps:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When a mail is
Le 3 nov. 08 à 12:02, Nicolas Letellier a écrit :
Hello.
I would like to have this possibility in postfix :
I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a mailbox (pop or imap), and it's TOO
an alias (to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
When a mail is sent for [EMAIL PROTECTED], the mail must arrive in
user mailbox
Toni Van Remortel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I never talked about a remote server.
0 is a number ;-p
other.example.com mda2:
and define mda2 to pass the message to the second MDA. (you can skip the
smtp_generic_maps part).
The 2 mailboxes reside on the same mailserver, only in a
Hello.
I would like to have this possibility in postfix :
I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a mailbox (pop or imap), and it's TOO an alias
(to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
When a mail is sent for [EMAIL PROTECTED], the mail must arrive in user
mailbox, AND be redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a postfi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of mouss
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 10:49 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple transports per domain
>
> Toni Van Remortel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> -Original Message
Gabriele Di Giambelardini wrote:
Ok, excuse me.
Now I post my postconf -n:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases,ldap:aliases
config_directory = /etc/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
default_destination_concurrency_limit = 50
double_bounce_sender = postmaster
forward_p
Toni Van Remortel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
[snip]
use virtual_alias_maps:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtual_alias_maps will work for 1 transport > multiple domains.
What I want,
Ok, excuse me.
Now I post my postconf -n:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases,ldap:aliases
config_directory = /etc/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
default_destination_concurrency_limit = 50
double_bounce_sender = postmaster
forward_path = $home/.forward
home_mailbox
56 matches
Mail list logo
