Thanks for the tips; I'll take a look at Nimel schema for a starting
point (I'm currently using the one that came with Phamm, and I'm not
yet sure how it'll measure up). I also wasn't aware of Apache
Directory Studio; I'll give it a whirl. Though I think LDAP
Administrator's templates will likely
** At 22:16 -0400 on 08/16/2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
>Vince Sabio:
>> I suspect that I actually have two different versions of postfix
>> installed -- and different commands are being executed by different
>> versions. Any idea how to fix this without breaking things farther?
>
>Indeed. Some maint
Vince Sabio:
> I suspect that I actually have two different versions of postfix
> installed -- and different commands are being executed by different
> versions. Any idea how to fix this without breaking things farther?
Indeed. Some maintainers change the default config_directory
from /etc/postf
** At 20:20 -0400 on 08/15/2008, Vince Sabio wrote:
Thanks, Duane. For anyone else who is in the same situation with
Postfix on FreeBSD, Duane's suggestion worked very well -- I made
copies of the key files, did a pkg_delete on the old version,
make-install-clean on the new one, and did a 'pos
--On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:31 PM -0300 Alejandro Cabrera Obed
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can I do to put SASL to work agains my LDAP ???
I have a patch using SASL to bind to LDAP for postfix, but still need to
finalize some work on it before it can be included into mainline Postf
Dear
I would like to monitoring postfix processes CPU usage/memory
consumtion by developping/reading "/proc/[pid]/stat".
the daemon "master" launch sub-processes qmgr,pickup,smtpd,cleanup etc..
.Each sub-process is linked to "master"
In order to monitor and to get the rights CPU/Memory usage
* Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > A reasonable setting is:
> >
> > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
> >
> > This allows any available mechanism except for anonymous, as it is highly
> > exploitable in the context of SMTP. (It's usable in the context of FTP o
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> A reasonable setting is:
>
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
>
> This allows any available mechanism except for anonymous, as it is highly
> exploitable in the context of SMTP. (It's usable in the context of FTP or IMAP
> shared folder access).
>
> Another reason
* Ethariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Ville,
>
> understanding with some difficulty :-) is LDAP. I have two questions:
> > those of you who use LDAP as a back-end, what tools do you use to
> > manage the entries, and what schema do you use to store Postfix
> > (including virtual domain) account
Hello Ville,
understanding with some difficulty :-) is LDAP. I have two questions:
> those of you who use LDAP as a back-end, what tools do you use to
> manage the entries, and what schema do you use to store Postfix
> (including virtual domain) account info? For straight LDAP
> administration I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
