On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Chris wrote:
> Exceptionally bad behavior for anything in the ports tree.
> I think this port should be patched out of the ports tree.
And then block that creature from ever having anything to do with ports
again... That is a gross abuse of trust.
-- Dave
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote:
[...]
> +-+
> cad/ifcopenshell| 0.6.0 |
> blenderbim-230306
> +-+
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Anyway building from ports on live machines has always been bad practice
> for a lot of reasons.
That's fine if you can afford a spare system just for building...
-- Dave
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, Roger Marquis wrote:
> Or $5/mo for a Digitalocean VM.
They host spammers, so I cannot use them (the Boulder Pledge etc); there
are probably other VMs around, should I feel the need.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > That's fine if you can afford a spare system
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, bob prohaska wrote:
More generally, can a poudriere session be gracefully stopped, say for
maintenance work or to run a more urgent job, and then restarted without
loss of intermediate work?
Well, there's ^Z depending upon what you want to do in the meantime...
-- Dave
Is it just me, or does this look suspiciously like an advert?
-- Dave
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I'm relatively neutral about this, but if it's adopted, please
document it. git still seems like a minefield to me.
Lots of references to "git hell" etc... It's basically a terrible design.
I use BitKeeper for my internal stuff; it helps that
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021, George Mitchell wrote:
Perhaps I'm naïve, but to me the Principle of Least Amazement really
does completely cover the issues being raised here. Is it necessary to
complicate the situation any more than that? -- George
First time I've heard POLA called that; I knew it as
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Gregory Byshenk wrote:
I am just a user, but my understanding is that FreeBSD developers take
the OS very seriously, but do not take themselves too seriously.
Best comment I've seen in this increasingly-sillier thread.
-- Dave
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > [...] Tho I must admit I find @bapt's recent tcp proposal an
> > interesting and appealing idea. :-)
>
> The proposal is now in anyway ;)
That was fast; excellent service, sir! I now have even more reason to
upgrade my ancient server (FTP is
10 matches
Mail list logo
