On 27/05/23 19:37, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 27/05/23 13:24, Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
>
>> plan 2 - Another option is doing the same as above, but my
updating
>> podofo to the latest version and moving old 0.9.x to a
graphics/podofo09
>> (or whatever) port, updating all depen
Hello Ronald and all!
Finally I build it after 57 hours @ 2000MHz !!!
Configs, photos and log at:
https://people.freebsd.org/~eduardo/logs/chromium/
I'm running it right now and it runs very smooth!
Next step will be compiling with LTO to check compile time and do some
comparisons on binary siz
On May 30, 2023, at 01:39, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello Ronald and all!
>
> Finally I build it after 57 hours @ 2000MHz !!!
So the prior "[88:53:28] Failed ports: www/chromium:build/timeout"
was not with the overclocking? Other differences that could
contribute to the time difference?
MAX_EXEC
Hello Mark,
Wrong poudriere.conf. Uploaded correct one.
Summary:
---
USE_TMPFS=no
PARALLEL_JOBS=1
ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAX_EXECUTION_TIME=259200
NOHANG_TIME=259200
---
htop showed me 4 escreveu no dia terça, 30/05/2023 à(s)
10:47:
> On May 30, 2023, at 01:39, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> > Hello Ro
(...)
(I've missed OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_aarch64=LTO so forgeting it.)
Conlusion:
Thats a big difference on compilation times:
---
build of www/firefox | firefox-113.0.2_1,2
build time: 05:35:57
---
build of www/chromium | chromium-113.0.5672.126
build time: 56:59:23
---
But I'm enjoying the fast and
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Hello.
Nuno Teixeira wrote on 2023/05/30 19:53:
> Thats a big difference on compilation times:
>
> ---
> build of www/firefox | firefox-113.0.2_1,2
> build time: 05:35:57
> ---
> build of www/chromium | chromium-113.0.5672.126
> build time: 56:59:23
> ---
The ratio is roughly similar to that for
