On 27/05/23 19:37, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 27/05/23 13:24, Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
>
>> plan 2 - Another option is doing the same as above, but my
updating
>> podofo to the latest version and moving old 0.9.x to a
graphics/podofo09
>> (or whatever) port, updating all dependencies to use the older
port for now.
>
> Also fine.
>
I'd like to choose plan 2.
Since you are the maintainer, I'll be happy to align myself with this
preference.
Suspected that, I'm also waiting for sunpoet (as podofo maintainer)
opinion. Maybe he also already has a plan or is working on something
that I don't know about.
Guido, do you have a patch for podofo and calibre already?
Since podofo has only 5 dependent ports, it should be possible to test
them all with podofo (0.10.0) and move incompatible ones to podofo09.
I admit I did not count the dependencies. With such a number your plan
is definitely the best one.
I have no patches at present, before investing time in this I thought
I'd check what the situation is and if work is already underway.
I'll start looking into it, except I'm at present busy with a strange
xfce4 issue I need to address.
Give me a few days to look into this.
Hi all,
I created a review for this, could you all take a look and give feedback?
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40328
Thanks in advance!
--
Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org>
