Re: ccache 3.x legacy ported but not 4.x

2022-06-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
That is, devel/ccache3 <- copy from devel/ccache devel/ccache4 <- new port devel/ccache <- switch to meta-port Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk <- add CCACHE_DEFAULT?= 3 ...is that? But I don't use ccache, though :) Regards.

Re: ccache 3.x legacy ported but not 4.x

2022-06-14 Thread Charlie Li
Nuno Teixeira wrote: I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version. Any special reason or imcompatibility for no updating to 4.x version? ccache 4 and later use cmake to build, which is problematic when poudr

Re: ccache 3.x legacy ported but not 4.x

2022-06-14 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Is there a PR or review that we can test? Thanks Kubilay Kocak escreveu no dia terça, 14/06/2022 à(s) 01:37: > On 13/06/2022 11:02 am, Derek Schrock wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:46:41PM EDT, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've started to use ccache with poudriere again pass

Re: ccache 3.x legacy ported but not 4.x

2022-06-13 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 13/06/2022 11:02 am, Derek Schrock wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:46:41PM EDT, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hello, I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version. Any special reason or imcompatibility for no upda

Re: ccache 3.x legacy ported but not 4.x

2022-06-12 Thread Derek Schrock
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:46:41PM EDT, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hello, > > I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and > I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version. > > Any special reason or imcompatibility for no updating to 4.x version? > > Thanks, >

ccache 3.x legacy ported but not 4.x

2022-06-12 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, I've started to use ccache with poudriere again passed some years now and I've noticed that we still use ccache legacy 3.x version. Any special reason or imcompatibility for no updating to 4.x version? Thanks, Nuno Teixeira