On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:22 PM Florian Smeets wrote:
> - The port does not adapt to infrastructure changes (i.e. USE_STAGE,
> MANPREFIX, compiler updates, etc.) within 6 months. Ports should be set
> to DEPRECATED after 3 months and can be removed after 6
Does this include special cases such as
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:21 PM Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2024, at 17:23, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:21 PM Mark Millard wrote:
> >>
> >> I fully agree that poudriere's systematic behavior
> >> rebuilds more th
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:21 PM Mark Millard wrote:
>
> I fully agree that poudriere's systematic behavior
> rebuilds more than the likes of portmaster [but fails
> less often].
>
>
> As stands there are tradeoffs between use of portmaster
> (and the like) vs. use of poudriere (/synth?). No one
>
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:51 AM Thierry Thomas wrote:
>
> Le dim. 18 févr. 24 à 12:30:55 +0100, Aryeh Friedman
> écrivait :
>
> > > It is still possible for maintainer to submit PR with patches not tested
> > > on poudriere: it is the committer’s responsibilit
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:45 AM Gleb Popov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 2:35 PM Aryeh Friedman
> wrote:
> > No it is not possible since the pkg's are usually of a different
> > version then what is built from ports (ports is almost newer)
>
> There ca
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:41 AM Vasily Postnicov wrote:
>
> My 50 cents about poudriere: it's definitely not a machine-killer. Just
> remember to disable tmpfs for too heavy ports (my list includes rust, 0ad,
> webengine), start with only two jobs (one job is bad because the build can be
> bloc
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:32 AM Gleb Popov wrote:
> And it is not a Poudriere deficiency. Just as you can ask portmaster
> to download some binary packages instead of building them, the same
> way you can configure Poudriere. To be honest, I don't quite get
> what's the problem you're talking abo
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:28 AM Thierry Thomas wrote:
>
> Le dim. 18 févr. 24 à 12:18:11 +0100, Aryeh Friedman
> écrivait :
>
> > Wonderful: Are we now moving to the binary pkg only for mere mortals
> > then. For example my desktop is a fairly standard 12 core machine
&
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:11 AM Gleb Popov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 1:37 PM Aryeh Friedman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 5:16 AM Felix Palmen wrote:
> > >
> > > * Tomoaki AOKI [20240218 17:49]:
> > > > [a lot about automo
Forwarding to all original recipients because of being blocked from
the -ports@ list (see below for details) but no maintainer should
*EVER* be blocked from that list
-- Forwarded message -
From: Aryeh Friedman
Date: Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: Re: FreeBSD ports
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 5:16 AM Felix Palmen wrote:
>
> * Tomoaki AOKI [20240218 17:49]:
> > [a lot about automotive regulations]
>
> That's a nice example how comparisons of entirely different domains
> almost always go completely wrong.
I guess you have never heard of software engineering?
Al
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 3:45 AM Mario Marietto wrote:
>
> Nice idea,but I think you will have no advantages changing userland. Actually
> I ve been able to squeeze the maximum features from the linuxulator. So im
> sure that you will not add any more feature to it. Im running cuda with the
> nv
12 matches
Mail list logo
