On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 6:45 AM Gleb Popov <arr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 2:35 PM Aryeh Friedman <aryehfried...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > No it is not possible since the pkg's are usually of a different > > version then what is built from ports (ports is almost newer) > > There can't be any other way - ports are building recipes for > packages. Packages will always lag behind. > > > may or may not work if your port expects the latest versions. In > > case you have tried it, is it almost impossible to keep a hybrid > > pkg/ports machine working your forced to pick one or the other and if > > your maintainer then your forced into ports only. > > If you're using ports only then you still compile everything. I fail > to see how this is Poudriere's fault.
It is Poudriere fault because the default config is completely in appropriate for anything smaller then a great builder in the sky machine (aka mere mortals). The defaults for portmaster and make install work very well on all machines though.
