On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:16 AM Hiroo Ono wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Trying to install mail/aerc, pkg says it conflicts with net/samba419.
>
> Installed packages to be REMOVED:
> samba419: 4.19.5_1
It looks like you're building your own repo using poudriere and then
installing from it?
In thi
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 12:05:30 -1000
bruce wrote:
> What has happened to math/sage? The port still exists but hasn't
> built in well over a year. Also misc/xiphos.
The ports' Makefile says: BROKEN= hoping to fix it with Python-3.9
Looking here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35404
Hello,
Trying to install mail/aerc, pkg says it conflicts with net/samba419.
Installed packages to be REMOVED:
samba419: 4.19.5_1
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:50:43AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does poudriere/pkg take the PKGNAMESUFFIX into account for a given origin?
>
> The context of the question is:
> I have a patch for a php-using port which flavourizes it. It will go from no
> PKGNAMESUFFIX to the usual
Hi,
Does poudriere/pkg take the PKGNAMESUFFIX into account for a given
origin?
The context of the question is:
I have a patch for a php-using port which flavourizes it. It will go
from no PKGNAMESUFFIX to the usual php version as PKGNAMESUFFIX. So the
package name will change from abc-1.2.3_
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
[I noticed that my SWAP figures were not self consistent for the armv7.]
On Feb 18, 2024, at 09:50, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I also forgot to mention an important FreeBSD configuration setting
> as well. It is not specific to poudriere use.]
>
>> On Feb 18, 2024, at 09:13, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
> On Mar 1, 2024, at 7:25 PM, Gleb Popov wrote:
>
> A small update: we're down to 705 ports failing and 342 skipped
> according to the latest build run by bofh@
>
> The updated list of failed ports can be obtained from the same URL as
> before [1].
>
> It is also worth mentioning that portmgr
Mathieu Arnold wrote on
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 15:37:08 UTC :
> I don't think you need to do much of the things you are saying, cross
> building can't really work because most ports will compile something and
> then try to run it, which won't work because an armv6 binary won't run
> on a x86_64 m
Hi,
I don't think you need to do much of the things you are saying, cross
building can't really work because most ports will compile something and
then try to run it, which won't work because an armv6 binary won't run
on a x86_64 machine.
What works on the other hand is using poudriere and qemu-u
10 matches
Mail list logo
