Hi,
Here are the links.
http://apt.freshrpms.net/
http://www.brennan.id.au/07-Package_Management.html#yum
http://linuxcommand.org/man_pages/yum8.html
http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/index.ptml
http://www.sial.org/howto/yum/
Bye,
Chaitanya V. Hazarey
--
_
On 7/6/05, Gurudatta Raut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ever tried giving links on apte ?
>
Ever tried reading the mailing list ettiquettes?
Is it that you have only email access and no web access whatsoever?
-aditya
--
__
Pu
> When you do a GNU/Linux install, you should install
> al
> the development tools and kernel sources. If a
> person
> doesn't install it, why blame the software?
>
> GNU/Linux gives the freedom to compile packages from
> sources or install from .rpms or using installers
> from
> distros.
>
> E
Hi Gurudutta,
I would suggest you lookup yum for redhat , and also apt-get from redhat.
Even when you have got all the packages in place to install you can use
a good tool such as ezrpm.
Look it up.
Regards,
Chaitanya V. Hazarey
--
___
Hi,
--- Gurudatta Raut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used it. TO my shock it gave message that it
> required 4 more packages.
You are to use the package installers for your distro
which will take care of dependencies.
> I was installing FireFox, Its a shame that now I am
> using Firefox on Win
> >
> > (first of all, I would say that gentoo portage is the best)
>
> <_*flame*_> FreeBSD ports are even better. <_*/flame*_>
thats like saying that the father is better
than a child. By laws of evolution, something will, generally
speaking, improve over generations. Thus portage is better.
:P
On 7/6/05, Sagar Gokhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, what is the setup.exe equivalent in LINUX ?
> > >
> >
> > None (that I know of). Its better to use a Debian based distribution.
> > All dependency problems will get solved.
>
> (first of all, I would say that gentoo portage is the best)
Gurudatta Raut wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but some good person from PLUG told me to use
- rpm - ivh Filename.rpm
I used it. TO my shock it gave message that it
required 4 more packages.
I was installing FireFox, Its a shame that now I am
using Firefox on WindowsXP, which got installed in a
breeze.
No
On 7/5/05, Gurudatta Raut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Aditya Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am a VB developer, When we package software we
> > take
> > > care that all the required files are with the
> > > setup.exe.
> > >
> >
> > Whether thats a good approach is debatable.
>
--- Aditya Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am a VB developer, When we package software we
> take
> > care that all the required files are with the
> > setup.exe.
> >
>
> Whether thats a good approach is debatable.
Tried and test with time for years is unquestionalble,
specially when o
> > So, what is the setup.exe equivalent in LINUX ?
> >
>
> None (that I know of). Its better to use a Debian based distribution.
> All dependency problems will get solved.
(first of all, I would say that gentoo portage is the best)
I dont know about others, but installing synaptic should make th
Hi Gurudatta!
> - rpm - ivh Filename.rpm
>
> I used it. TO my shock it gave message that it
> required 4 more packages.
I'm afraid but it happens and it's always frustrating... :-(
When I started with Linux, I got frustrated with it too...
RPM on it's own will only check if all dependencies are
On 7/3/05, Gurudatta Raut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but some good person from PLUG told me to use
>
> - rpm - ivh Filename.rpm
>
> I used it. TO my shock it gave message that it
> required 4 more packages.
>
> I was installing FireFox, Its a shame that now I am
> using Firefox
13 matches
Mail list logo
