Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-18 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:27 PM, म.हा.सा.ग.र wrote: > The gnunify 09 is sponsored by mozilla... and i have just managed to > crash it on my paltop... > > here is the the report... > > Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that > you need to enable TCP/IP networking for O

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-12 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Mandar Vaze wrote: >> now i want to know how exactly did this happen? >> >> i mean what must be the causes... now everytime i start mozilla it >> complains this way... although my Mystriva is running just fine >> without any crash :-) > > Mystriva is unsupported pl

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-12 Thread Mandar Vaze
> now i want to know how exactly did this happen? > > i mean what must be the causes... now everytime i start mozilla it > complains this way... although my Mystriva is running just fine > without any crash :-) Mystriva is unsupported platform :) -- ___

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-12 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
The gnunify 09 is sponsored by mozilla... and i have just managed to crash it on my paltop... here is the the report... Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-11 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Pranav Peshwe wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:44 PM, म.हा.सा.ग.र wrote: > >> >> >> how would you address that if it was you who were on the other side of >> this argument? >> >> that would be helpful in bug fixing.. ! >> > > 'Bug fixing' ?? some may prefer ca

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-11 Thread shirish
Reply in-line :- On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:17, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:32 AM, shirish wrote: > >> I just see/saw the following on the site >> >> http://gnunify.in/09/content/sessions >> >> 1 i-want-2-do-project. tell-me-wat-2-do Shakthi Kannan >> >> No

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-11 Thread Pranav Peshwe
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:44 PM, म.हा.सा.ग.र wrote: > > > how would you address that if it was you who were on the other side of > this argument? > > that would be helpful in bug fixing.. ! > 'Bug fixing' ?? -- __ Pune GNU/Linu

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-11 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:32 AM, shirish wrote: > I just see/saw the following on the site > > http://gnunify.in/09/content/sessions > > 1 i-want-2-do-project. tell-me-wat-2-do Shakthi Kannan > > Now I read something into it. It could be or not be what I thought it was. > How am I suppose

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-11 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Aditya Godbole wrote: > 2009/2/11 म.हा.सा.ग.र : >> ... much more than my posts perhaps... >> and he has a right to cite license to be followed for all of the text >> (s)he utters... because it is free (not as in free speech or beer but >> in some other way which fo

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-10 Thread Aditya Godbole
2009/2/11 म.हा.सा.ग.र : > ... much more than my posts perhaps... > and he has a right to cite license to be followed for all of the text > (s)he utters... because it is free (not as in free speech or beer but > in some other way which follows that license) Anyone has the right to attempt to put an

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-10 Thread म . हा . सा . ग . र
by making or calling something a public domain you also make it available to the public... and public has a say in the process and government conduct of it... an audit of public entity is a possibility... i wonder of that is ever thought of while taking into account legal implications of Pune Lin

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-10 Thread Aditya Godbole
2009/2/11 Sudhanwa Jogalekar : > > regards > -Sudhanwa > ps: cut off that cc license crap for the email signature. It does not > serve any purpose. > Is that license even legally valid on a public mailing list? Maybe the admin should explicitly specify that all posts on the list will be public dom

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-10 Thread shirish
Reply in-line :- On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:53, Sudhanwa Jogalekar wrote: > There is nothing in that post about SK's session. I just see/saw the following on the site http://gnunify.in/09/content/sessions 1 i-want-2-do-project. tell-me-wat-2-do Shakthi Kannan Now I read something i

Re: [PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-10 Thread Sudhanwa Jogalekar
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:47 PM, shirish wrote: > Hi all, > Made a blog post about SK's first session project-to-do or rather one > of the projects that could be fulfilling to an aspiring developer > (perhaps) > There is nothing in that post about SK's session. These kind of mails look like se

[PLUG] software-project-todo

2009-02-10 Thread shirish
Hi all, Made a blog post about SK's first session project-to-do or rather one of the projects that could be fulfilling to an aspiring developer (perhaps) http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2009/02/10/software-project-todo/ Comments, suggestions as always welcome. -- Regards,