On Wednesday 07 May 2008 18:00:42 ഓം wrote:
> but i would be a really good feature for KDE to automagically convert
> old KMailRC into the new *avatar*. And if I go and ask for it in
> bugzilla.kde.org, they would treat it as a new feature and would be
> put under different category that has lower
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, ഓം wrote:
> Solution is already out here on the list archives...
>
> what I want to share is why one should rename old kmailrc and force
> kmail to create a self-reliant fresh kmailrc...
>
> Simply because it will load in new features that otherwise won't get
> activated..
Solution is already out here on the list archives...
what I want to share is why one should rename old kmailrc and force
kmail to create a self-reliant fresh kmailrc...
Simply because it will load in new features that otherwise won't get activated..
If I simply file a bug that the said thing is
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:11 PM, ഓം <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have now become aware of what needs to be done to fix the problem...
Please share the solution.
regards,
shantanoo
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:
