Solution is already out here on the list archives... what I want to share is why one should rename old kmailrc and force kmail to create a self-reliant fresh kmailrc...
Simply because it will load in new features that otherwise won't get activated.. If I simply file a bug that the said thing is not working... probably I will be advised tersely that same thing that विद्यावाचस्पती Shridhar has already suggested... but i would be a really good feature for KDE to automagically convert old KMailRC into the new *avatar*. And if I go and ask for it in bugzilla.kde.org, they would treat it as a new feature and would be put under different category that has lower priority since it may not be a sh0wstopper! How's that for a simplified analysis of the usual situation, the way most systems work? :-)
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
