Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/21397
Hello Helmut,
thanks for pointing out! I already dropped the cockpit-tests package completely
in upstream main (not released yet), but the file conflict was missing indeed.
Fixing in above
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
pkg-utopia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Owner: Martin Pitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Utopia Maintenance Team
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cockpit-files
Version : 2
Upstream Contact: Martin Pitt
* URL
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/20543
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Hello Michael,
Michael Biebl [2024-06-03 14:39 +0200]:
> Jun 03 14:35:42 mars apparmor.systemd[1026]: AppArmor-Analysefehler f?r
> /etc/apparmor.d in profile /etc/apparmor.d/cockpit-desktop
ian/changelog
--- cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog 2024-04-02 11:11:19.0 +0200
+++ cockpit-287.1/debian/changelog 2024-04-16 09:20:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+cockpit (287.1-0+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add 0001-ssh-Use-valid-host-name-in-test-ssh
Wim Bertels [2023-10-23 16:06 +]:
> if the manpages are generated correctly:
> https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/cockpit-ws/remotectl.8.en.html
> remotectl is present in unstable and testing as well?
No, it's not any more in testing and unstable:
https://packages.debian.org/trixie/amd64/co
Control: tag -1 wontfix
Hello Wim,
wim [2023-10-23 17:16 +0200]:
> it seems the remotectl command is missing (from bookworm and
> bookworm-backports)?
> (as it was included in bullseye, and is included in testing)
This is intended, see https://cockpit-project.org/blog/cockpit-252.html
Out of i
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/19407
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Hello Helmut,
Helmut Grohne [2023-09-27 13:46 +0200]:
> We want to change the value of systemdsystemunitdir in systemd.pc to
> point below /usr. cockpit's upstream build system consumes th
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/19232
Lucas Nussbaum [2023-08-13 16:33 +0200]:
> This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
> (dpkg-buildpackage ; dpkg-buildpackage -S).
> > dpkg-source: error: cannot
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit-machines/pull/1183
Lucas Nussbaum [2023-08-13 15:17 +0200]:
> > dpkg-source: info: building cockpit-machines using existing
> > ./cockpit-machines_296.orig.tar.xz
> > dpkg-source: info: local change
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/19188
Hello Helmut,
Helmut Grohne [2023-08-08 12:38 +0200]:
> cockpit-tests has a non-trivial aspect when it comes to finalizing the
> /usr-merge. As we move all files from / to /usr, we'll likely also move
> /lib/systemd/syste
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/19092
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello Michael,
Michael Biebl [2023-07-10 22:37 +0200]:
> the latest update of libblockdev from version 2.28 to 3.0 has seen some
> major changes, among them an SONAME bump.
>
> Please test cockpit(
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/18000
Hey Simon,
Simon McVittie [2022-12-06 13:20 +]:
> This package has a Recommends on the transitional package policykit-1,
> which has been separated into polkitd, pkexec and (deprecated
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream pending
Hello again,
Martin Pitt [2022-10-26 6:04 +0200]:
> Argh, this keeps haunting us. We already tried to fix that in [1] and [2], but
> no way. Why must glib be so unpredictable? 😢
> [2] https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/17755
Never
Hello Michael, hello Lis,
Michael Biebl [2022-10-26 1:41 +0200]:
> cockpit seems to fail its test suite on the aforementioned architectures
Thanks for the report!
> on armel:
> ~
> Bail out! GLib-FATAL-WARNING: GChildWatchSource: Exit status of a child
> process was requested but ECHIL
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/16928
I sent an upstream PR to add the missing node_modules/ copyrights. If there is
anything else wrong, I'll need more information (see my previous reply).
Thanks!
Martin
___
tag -1 moreinfo
Hallo Thorsten,
Thorsten Alteholz [2022-02-05 9:40 +]:
> please rework your debian/copyright. Especially everything from node_modules
> seems to be missing. Please also check other releases.
The webpack bits in dist/ are autogenerated, and we have spent quite some
effort to
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello José,
José Miguel Gonçalves [2021-10-04 10:29 +0100]:
> I would like to try cockpit-machines v251 in bullseye but that is currently
> not possible because, while cockpit v251 package is released in
> bullseye-backports, cockpit-machines is not.
> Please build cockp
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Hello Friedemann,
Friedemann Schorer [2021-10-03 23:40 +0200]:
> Severity: serious
That feels inflated to me. The package builds fine in official buildds [1], in
upstream CI (which uses pbuilder) and locally in a debian-sid cont
Hello Simon,
Simon Walter [2021-05-27 10:17 +0900]:
> I was trying to make it quicker to deploy for those who run it like this
> anyway, but I understand not wanting to be responsible for partially
> functioning software. In that case, shall I open a bug to make systemd a
> dependency?
This is al
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann [2021-05-20 21:52 +0200]:
> 5m1.4s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
> /usr/share/cockpit/branding/opensuse/default-1920x1200.jpg ->
> ../../../wallpapers/default-1920x1200.jpg (cockpit-ws)
> /usr/share/cockpit/branding/opensuse/favicon.ico
Control: tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/15438
Hello Nicolas,
Nicolas George [2021-02-25 12:27 +0100]:
> When trying for a read-only root filesystem, I am blocked by the fact
> that cockpit tries to write in /etc at star
Control: reassign -1 debconf
Control: forcemerge 983200 -1
Hello again,
Martin Pitt [2021-02-23 15:48 +0100]:
> Philip Hands [2021-02-21 10:28 +0100]:
> > Rather than waiting for debconf to be updated to provide you with a new
> > image to
> > play with, I'd sugges
Hello Philip,
Philip Hands [2021-02-21 10:28 +0100]:
> Rather than waiting for debconf to be updated to provide you with a new image
> to
> play with, I'd suggest going to the source, and using the SVG here:
>
> https://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd.svg
Thanks, very well spotted! That's wh
Control: reassign -1 network-manager 1.29.90-1
Control: tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/662
This eventually *did* turn out to be a bug in NetworkManager itself, and only
became visible now because of the be
Control: reassign -1 0.22.0-1
Control: affects -1 network-manager
Adrian Bunk [2021-02-12 16:22 +0200]:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/python-dbusmock/10412779/log.gz
> test_one_wifi_with_accesspoints (__main__.TestNetworkManager) ... **
> libnm:ERROR:libnm/nm-client.c:28
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/15223
Control: tag -1 upstream pending
Hello John,
Ugh, is HPPA know to have such a poor threading performance in general?
Thanks for doing the manual build!
> We either need to skip the test-tls-certfile on hppa or greatly ex
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/15074
Hello Cesare,
Cesare Leonardi [2020-12-26 16:16 +0100]:
> For this reason I believe that cockpit package should at least
> recommend "sudo".
Thanks for your report! I sent a PR upstream to adjust the dependencies
accordi
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/15065
Hello Cesare,
thanks for your report! I sent an upstream PR to fix that.
Martin
___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@al
Control: retitle -1 FTBFS on IPv6-only hosts
Control: found -1 188-1
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/14098
Control: tag -1 patch upstream
Hello Aurelien,
Aurelien Jarno [2020-05-16 19:27 +0200]:
> This is an IPv6 host only,
Ah! This explains the issue indeed
Michael Biebl [2020-05-16 12:39 +0200]:
> Source: cockpit
> Version: 219-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> looks like the latest release reliably triggers a FTBFS on arch-all:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=cockpit&ver=219-1&arch=all
>
> The relevant part from the buil
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream pending
Hello Adrian,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [2020-01-22 16:40 +0100]:
> cockpit FTBFS on sparc64 due to unaligned access. The attached package fixes
> it. I have also forwarded the issue upstream [1].
Thanks a lot Adrian for tracking this down! The fix landed u
Hello Michael and Thomas,
Michael Biebl [2020-01-08 19:42 +0100]:
> > The latest update of network-manager causes an autopkgtest regression in
> > python-dbusmock.
> >
> > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/python-dbusmock/3793816/log.gz
> >
> > ==
Hello jim_p,
jim_p [2019-10-30 18:34 +0200]:
> There has been a new version available from upstream since mid October.
> https://cockpit-project.org/blog/cockpit-205.html
>
> Please update the package in the repo. Cockpit on debian usually gets updated
> the day it is released from upstream.
Yes
Hello Jan,
Jan Luca Naumann [2019-03-12 10:43 +0100]:
> some time ago I asked about the reason why there is no current version
> in Debian testing/unstable but only in experimental?
Because that "newer" policykit version moves to JavaScript based rules using
mozjs, which is just utterly wrong con
Control: retitle -1 FTBFS without a loopback inet device
Control: severity -1 normal
Hello Santiago,
Santiago Vila [2019-01-19 17:35 +]:
> I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
This fails a lot of tests like this:
| cockpit-protocol:ERROR:src/common/test-webserver.c:57:setup
Hello Santiago,
Santiago Vila [2019-01-13 13:37 +0100]:
> > Indeed, this points out a broken build environment that doesn't have a
> > loopback
> > device. [...]
>
> No, not the case. This used to build ok in the past in my autobuilders:
The loopback issue does not affect *your* builds. E. g.
h
Control: block -1 by bug 918892
Hello Santiago, Andreas,
Andreas Henriksson [2019-01-12 21:41 +0100]:
> > # FAIL: 31
>
> Lots of failing tests there
Right, but they have two different root causes. The first is bug 918892, a
recent regression in libssh 0.8.6, which causes all the cockpit-ss
Hello Eric,
Eric Garver [2018-11-26 10:20 -0500]:
> No. As far as I can tell, firewalld never uses iptables -R (rule
> replace) option. It's possible this is being triggered by something
> external via the direct/passthrough interface (e.g. docker, libvirt).
I collected some more info here:
ht
Hello again,
another observation: In Fedora 29, firewalld also defaults to the iptables
backend, and I get the same error noise in "systemctl status firewalld". But
"--reload" works.
The main differences that I can see is:
* kernel: 4.18 on Debian unstable, 4.19.2 on Fedora 29
* iptables: 1.8.
Hello again,
I now downloaded our previous debian-testing image, where the failure does not
happen. This has the same kernel, docker, and libvirt version, and firewalld
0.6.3-1. Upgrading just firewalld to 0.6.3-3 introduces this regression.
Presumably upstream now only tests with nftables, and th
Package: firewalld
Version: 0.6.3-3
Severity: important
A recent regression in Debian testing broke firewalld. This is on a stock
Debian-testing system, without a custom kernel, custom firewall configs, etc.
-- just a plain "apt install firewalld". However, it does have libvirt and
docker.io insta
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello Michael,
Michael Biebl [2018-08-07 22:04 +0200]:
> Apparently the preferred solution is to remove the file from cockpit and
> continue to ship it from firewalld.
Confirmed.
> Martin, could you pull
> https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/commit/d8b628507
> or
42 matches
Mail list logo
