On 18 November 2015 at 17:06, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 18.11.2015 um 20:53 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 15.11.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>>> systemd-analyze is rather large. Perhaps there is scope for a
>>> systemd-tools or something that covers things that will probably not
>>> be nee
Am 18.11.2015 um 20:53 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 15.11.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> systemd-analyze is rather large. Perhaps there is scope for a
>> systemd-tools or something that covers things that will probably not
>> be needed on production containers (systemd-{analyze,cgls,cgtop,
Am 15.11.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> systemd-analyze is rather large. Perhaps there is scope for a
> systemd-tools or something that covers things that will probably not
> be needed on production containers (systemd-{analyze,cgls,cgtop,delta}).
I'm a bit torn on this. Those four tools
Thanks for the report!
On 14 November 2015 at 16:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Another topic I raised during the talk, was the constant growth of the
> systemd project and how to keep the footprint down for minimal
> installations by splitting up the package.
> I suggested that distros might coordin
Hi everybody!
Last week I was at the inaugural systemd.conf which took place in Berlin
from November 5th-7th [1]. The first two days were devoted to talks and
presentations, the third (and last) day for hacking and discussion.
You can find pictures [2] and videos [3] & slides [4] for the talks.
Le
