clone 816391 -1
reassign -1 systemd
retitle -1 systemctl status should propagate through PartOf
block 816391 -1
thanks
Michael Biebl schrieb am Donnerstag, dem 14. April 2016:
> Am 14.04.2016 um 00:46 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > The tor.service afaics is only used, so you have a
> > systemctl resta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 816391 -1
Bug #816391 [tor] tor: "systemctl status tor" does not provide useful output
Bug 816391 cloned as bug 826041
> reassign -1 systemd
Bug #826041 [tor] tor: "systemctl status tor" does not provide useful output
Bug reassigned from pac
On Wed 2016-04-13 18:52:23 -0400, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 14.04.2016 um 00:46 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 13.04.2016 um 21:45 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
>>> is there a reason to have a "tor.service" that is distinct from the
>>> tor@*.service files? if not, maybe we could get rid of it entire
Am 14.04.2016 um 00:46 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 13.04.2016 um 21:45 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
>> is there a reason to have a "tor.service" that is distinct from the
>> tor@*.service files? if not, maybe we could get rid of it entirely?
>>
>> If there is a reason to have it, how can we avoid
Am 13.04.2016 um 21:45 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> is there a reason to have a "tor.service" that is distinct from the
> tor@*.service files? if not, maybe we could get rid of it entirely?
>
> If there is a reason to have it, how can we avoid having "systemctl
> status tor" mask the statuses o
On Tue 2016-04-12 18:57:06 -0400, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'm missing a bit of context here.
> But if you have templated services and you want to list the status for
> all of them, you can use
> systemctl status tor@*.service
>
> Is this is what you are looking for?
at the moment, i see this:
0 dk
Am 13.04.2016 um 00:32 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> On Tue 2016-04-12 17:31:51 -0400, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>>> Because of the systemd generator approach for tor services, i don't
>>> seem to be able to do "systemctl status tor" and get any
On Tue 2016-04-12 17:31:51 -0400, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> Because of the systemd generator approach for tor services, i don't
>> seem to be able to do "systemctl status tor" and get any report about
>> the status of the underlying services.
>>
