Am 14.04.2016 um 00:46 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 13.04.2016 um 21:45 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor: >> is there a reason to have a "tor.service" that is distinct from the >> tor@*.service files? if not, maybe we could get rid of it entirely? >> >> If there is a reason to have it, how can we avoid having "systemctl >> status tor" mask the statuses of the actual running (or failing) >> services? > > The tor.service afaics is only used, so you have a > systemctl restart/reload tor > shortcut which propagates that request to all instances. > tor.service in itself does not provide any service. > > > So it is useful to have.
I'm not sure. Maybe we can convince upstream that using "status" on a service which is composed by several sub-services via PartOf [0], also propagates the status request and merges that into a single output. Or we add a dedicated key, like PropagatesReloadTo [1], say ProgatesStatusTo Michael [0] https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html#PartOf= [1] https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html#PropagatesReloadTo= -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
