Please update ifupdown to 0.7.50 and test if that fixes your problem.
Hello, with ifupdown 0.7.51, the problem is still there.
Note that I'm still with systemd 208-8. I'm still kind of afraid to move
to 215-8 due to bugs which look related with nvidia cards.
Hello.
I have updated to system
Here are joined why you requested.
I hope that the provided information could help you.
Let me know.
Thanks again for the care.
Please update ifupdown to 0.7.50 and test if that fixes your problem.
Hello, with ifupdown 0.7.51, the problem is still there.
Note that I'm still with systemd 2
Am 17.11.2014 um 21:59 schrieb dAgeCKo:
> Le 17/11/2014 14:33, intrigeri a écrit :
>> Hi dAgeCKo,
>>
>> Michael Biebl wrote (09 Nov 2014 17:45:45 GMT) :
>>> Please update to the latest version in jessie (i.e. 215-5)
>>
>>> Then boot with systemd.log_level=debug on the kernel command line and
>>> th
Le 18/11/2014 09:30, intrigeri a écrit :
Hi dAgeCKo,
dAgeCKo wrote (17 Nov 2014 20:59:15 GMT) :
journalctl -al
[...]
Here are joined why you requested.
I hope that the provided information could help you.
Thanks!
However, the journalctl output seems to be empty (or is it my MUA?) =>
may yo
Hi dAgeCKo,
dAgeCKo wrote (17 Nov 2014 20:59:15 GMT) :
>>> journalctl -al
[...]
> Here are joined why you requested.
> I hope that the provided information could help you.
Thanks!
However, the journalctl output seems to be empty (or is it my MUA?) =>
may you please double-check that you were run
Hi dAgeCKo,
Michael Biebl wrote (09 Nov 2014 17:45:45 GMT) :
> Please update to the latest version in jessie (i.e. 215-5)
> Then boot with systemd.log_level=debug on the kernel command line and
> then include the output of
> systemd-analyze dump
> journalctl -al
> Please also attach your networ
Am 09.11.2014 um 18:42 schrieb dAgeCKo:
> I cannot, for now, update to the latest systemd since some severe bugs
> are still present.
Which bugs are present in 215 which are not in 208?
> If you can confirm that systemd (and its dependencies) will upgrade with
> no issues, then I'll might give i
Le 09/11/2014 17:49, Michael Biebl a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am 09.11.2014 um 09:41 schrieb dAgeCKo:
Package: systemd
Version: 208-8
Severity: normal
Debian: Testing amd64
Regression: Yes
Since systemd, my CIFS drives are woken up early at the boot time, when
all the local filesystem
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am 09.11.2014 um 09:41 schrieb dAgeCKo:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 208-8
> Severity: normal
> Debian: Testing amd64
> Regression: Yes
>
> Since systemd, my CIFS drives are woken up early at the boot time, when
> all the local filesystems are mounted. So this is one of
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #768776 [systemd] systemd wakes up CIFS/network drives too early
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
768776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
_
Package: systemd
Version: 208-8
Severity: normal
Debian: Testing amd64
Regression: Yes
Since systemd, my CIFS drives are woken up early at the boot time, when
all the local filesystems are mounted. So this is one of the first
operations done during boot.
This results in CIFS drives not to be a
11 matches
Mail list logo
