FWIW -
I have encountered this only one time(as of now), on ParrotSec OS (I
know it's debian, I believe it is stretch) after installing firejail and
running thunderbird firejail'd (pluma was also open at the time, as was
the Mate panel editor and a couple folders). The computer slowing down
wa
On 05/08/2017 04:17 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> This looks like a duplicate of
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831894
> which is fixed in newer version of systemd.
Ack, missed that. i usually use something like:
$ apt-listbugs -s all list systemd | grep -i memory
to searc
On May 09, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Do you think this bug report is important enough to be fixed in stretch,
> i.e. warrants another upload of src:systemd?
Either in 9.0 or it should be queued for the next point release.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Am 08.05.2017 um 22:11 schrieb Stephen Dowdy (resonance):
> Package: systemd
> Version: 215-17+deb8u7
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Freshly updated Debian Jessie 8.8 and rebooted (different machines than
> reporting machine, but verified on multiple systems, and should be same
> p
Hi Marco
Am 08.05.2017 um 18:19 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On May 08, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Maintaining those udev rules in src:systemd as a downstream patch is not
>> something I plan to continue. It was probably a mistake to add them in
>> the first place.
> Clearly it is too late to add a ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #861171 (http://bugs.debian.org/861171)
# Bug title: #warning "Consider adding the rig
On May 08, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Maintaining those udev rules in src:systemd as a downstream patch is not
> something I plan to continue. It was probably a mistake to add them in
> the first place.
Clearly it is too late to add a new binary package for Debian 9, so
I think that we should accept
Am 08.05.2017 um 16:18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Hi,
> I'm missing context here. Can you go into more detail please? What exactly is
> the question here?
Sorry.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854475 is about
several issues with postfix being started before the network is up,
f
I'm missing context here. Can you go into more detail please? What exactly is
the question here?
Regards,
Michael
Am 8. Mai 2017 16:07:12 MESZ schrieb Bernhard Schmidt :
>Am 08.05.2017 um 05:59 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> On Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:55:58 PM Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>> On Sat,
Am 08.05.2017 um 05:59 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> On Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:55:58 PM Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:42:37PM +0200, Marcus Jodorf wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there anything I can do to get this fixed for Stretch? I can
>> pretty reliably reproduce this issue wit
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #862062 [src:systemd] FTBFS on sparc64 due to SIGBUS in test suite
Added tag(s) pending.
--
862062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
___
Control: tags -1 + pending
Am 08.05.2017 um 02:25 schrieb James Clarke:
> Source: systemd
> Version: 233-6
> Tags: upstream patch
> Forwarded: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5622
> User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: sparc64
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
>
> H
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 824532 with 848327
Bug #824532 [udev] udev: Include udev rules for more U2F devices
824532 was blocked by: 848327 846359
824532 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 824532: 848327
> unblock 824532 with 846359
Bug #824532 [
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 824532 -1
Bug #824532 [udev] udev: Include udev rules for more U2F devices
Bug #824532 [udev] udev: Include udev rules for more U2F devices
Marked as found in versions systemd/232-22.
Added tag(s) patch.
Bug #862067 [udev] udev: U2F support. Outdated uacce
Control: forcemerge 824532 -1
Hi
Am 08.05.2017 um 07:43 schrieb Philipp Hug:
> Package: udev
> Version: 232-22
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
> The udev rules for U2F devices is outdated and misses many newer U2F devices.
>
> Please consider applying the attached patch.
This is a dup
how are you doing today..
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
how are you doing today..
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
Hi.
The error message is systremd-udevd : swq 598
`/devices/pci:00/:00:08.0/net/eth1`
is taking a long time. After this i have the one normal interface like eth0
and the other have renameX. This is in Vbox enviroment. I have tried to
disable predictable names but it does not affect the boot
19 matches
Mail list logo
