Bug#856337: systemd: please support kernel 4.4, or don't hardcode dm interface versions

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 28.02.2017 um 02:19 schrieb Marc Lehmann: > Package: systemd > Version: 232-18 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I upgraded to stretch, using kernel 4.4.47. When rebooting, system could > not clean up device mapper targets, leading to a hard crash for all cache > targets, requiring m

Bug#856337: systemd: please support kernel 4.4, or don't hardcode dm interface versions

2017-02-27 Thread Marc Lehmann
Package: systemd Version: 232-18 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I upgraded to stretch, using kernel 4.4.47. When rebooting, system could not clean up device mapper targets, leading to a hard crash for all cache targets, requiring many hours of heavy I/O after bootup and creating a high-risk wi

Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Martin, On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > The fix landed in upstream master. By "certainly miss stretch" you mean > support > for tilegx at large, or this particular patch? Because we have some other That was way faster than I expected. I do mean tilegx support at

Processed: Re: Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 fixed-upstream Bug #856306 [src:systemd] add tilegx architecture support to systemd Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. -- 856306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856306 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __

Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream Hello Helmut, Helmut Grohne [2017-02-27 17:09 +0100]: > I don't think cherry-picking is necessary or useful, because it will > certainly miss stretch, it will very likely hit buster, and > cherry-picking it in the bootstrap tooling is easy. The fix landed in upstre

Processed: bug 856306 is forwarded to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5474

2017-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 856306 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5474 Bug #856306 [src:systemd] add tilegx architecture support to systemd Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5474' from 'https://lists.freedesktop

Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: forwarded -1 https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2017-February/038375.html On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:16:20PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Please file that issue directly upstream and report back with the bug > number so we can mark it as fowarded accordingly. Done. >

Processed: Re: Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2017-February/038375.html Bug #856306 [src:systemd] add tilegx architecture support to systemd Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2017-February/03

Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Dear Helmut Am 27.02.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Helmut Grohne: > systemd fails to cross build for tilegx (and likely fails to build Please file that issue directly upstream and report back with the bug number so we can mark it as fowarded accordingly. Once it has been accepted upstream, we can consid

Bug#856306: add tilegx architecture support to systemd

2017-02-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: systemd Tags: upstream patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap systemd fails to cross build for tilegx (and likely fails to build natively as well), because the LIB_ARCH_TUPLE is missing. It has since been added to dpkg's cputable. Thus I am attaching the obvious patch setting

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.02.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Martin Pitt: > Felipe Sateler [2017-02-27 9:39 -0300]: >> For avoidance of doubt, RuntimeMaxUse does not refer to RSS, but >> rather to the "disk" space used in /run when the persistent journal is >> not active. So this flag does not control what you want. AFAIK, the

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Felipe Sateler [2017-02-27 9:39 -0300]: > For avoidance of doubt, RuntimeMaxUse does not refer to RSS, but > rather to the "disk" space used in /run when the persistent journal is > not active. So this flag does not control what you want. AFAIK, there > is no way to control max memory usage. Ther

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply)
The observed behaviour is *with* the persistent journal. Forwarding to inetutils-syslogd and using Storage=none results in steady memory consumption at 20% of the peak memory I experienced while testing Storage=persistent (and that's for both journald and syslogd combined). On 17-02-27 07:23

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply)
Ahh. Is there currently any functionality in journald for controlling flushing to limit RSS or is this just a case where journald's built-in logging capabilities are not currently suited to constrained systems? On 17-02-27 07:04 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 27.02.2017 um 10:41 schrieb Stephan

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply) wrote: > > In my testing, 7.7% RSS appeared to be a hard lower limit well above the > 2/3/4 MiB I specified while experimenting. For avoidance of doubt, RuntimeMaxUse does not refer to RSS, but rather to the "disk" space

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.02.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply): > Is there currently any functionality in journald for controlling > flushing to limit RSS Not that I'm aware of. That said, if you have constrained memory requirements, I wouldn't log to /run (which is a tmpfs, i.e. uses you

Bug#854805: systemd: dbus interraction problems leading to timeouts

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.02.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply): > I'm not sure if it's relevant, but I managed to get similar connection > timeouts (specifically, `systemctl` consistently failing with timeouts > on `org.freedesktop.systemd1`) when I ran `apt-get install systemd-cron` > and

Bug#854805: systemd: dbus interraction problems leading to timeouts

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.02.2017 um 11:04 schrieb Vincent Danjean: > I forgot to update this bug report. > On my machine, I did some cleanup (apt-get autoremove + manual > removal of package that are not available in stretch any more). > This solve the problem: the machine boots correctly without > any problema

Bug#856265: marked as done (systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed)

2017-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:04:00 +0100 with message-id <9f79cc95-f1b9-684e-38ac-27749e35d...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed has caused the Debian Bug report #856265, regarding systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not pr

Bug#854805: systemd: dbus interraction problems leading to timeouts

2017-02-27 Thread Vincent Danjean
Le 27/02/2017 à 09:51, Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply) a écrit : > I'm not sure if it's relevant, but I managed to get similar > connection timeouts (specifically, `systemctl` consistently failing > with timeouts on `org.freedesktop.systemd1`) when I ran `apt-get > install systemd-cron` an

Bug#856265: systemd-journald: RuntimeMaxUse is not properly obeyed

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply)
Package: systemd Version: 215-17+deb8u6 Severity: normal File: /lib/systemd/systemd-journald Dear Maintainer, While configuring a Debian jessie VM for testing deployments to a 256MiB VPS, I discovered that no combination of settings I tried would keep journald's memory usage from climbing sign

Bug#753576: systemd stopped responding to dbus.socket connections

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply)
Oh, wait. I forgot step 0. Update and upgrade first. It's such a habit that I lump it in with importing the VMs. On 17-02-27 04:04 AM, Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply) wrote: I'm not sure if it's the same problem, but, I have something that at least has similar symptoms which may be eas

Bug#753576: systemd stopped responding to dbus.socket connections

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply)
I'm not sure if it's the same problem, but, I have something that at least has similar symptoms which may be easier to reproduce: Release: The VirtualBox version of the bento/debian-8.6 Vagrant VM Reproduction: 1. apt-get install systemd-cron 2. Futz around until you realize jessie's systemd is

Bug#854805: systemd: dbus interraction problems leading to timeouts

2017-02-27 Thread Stephan Sokolow (You actually CAN reply)
I'm not sure if it's relevant, but I managed to get similar connection timeouts (specifically, `systemctl` consistently failing with timeouts on `org.freedesktop.systemd1`) when I ran `apt-get install systemd-cron` and then changed my mind after I realized my systemd was too early to support ho