Your message dated Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:04:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794339: fixed in init-system-helpers 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #794339,
regarding init-system-helpers: unsatisfiable cross Build-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:04:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#801470: fixed in init-system-helpers 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #801470,
regarding dh-systemd: please sort list of unit files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:55:44 +0200
Source: init-system-helpers
Binary: init-system-helpers dh-systemd init
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: pkg-systemd-maintai
init-system-helpers_1.24_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
init-system-helpers_1.24.dsc
init-system-helpers_1.24.tar.xz
dh-systemd_1.24_all.deb
init-system-helpers_1.24_all.deb
init_1.24_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello Reiner,
Reiner Herrmann [2015-10-10 21:04 +0200]:
> While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
> that dh-systemd doesn't sort the list of unit files in prerm/postinst.
Nice catch, thanks! Applied.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #801470 [src:init-system-helpers] dh-systemd: please sort list of unit files
Added tag(s) pending.
--
801470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Felipe Sateler [2015-10-12 20:04 -0300]:
> Nod. Although there will have to be shuffling around of at least all
> the dbus policies, no?
Now that dbus 1.10 is in testing, we can actually move them to
/usr/share. \o/
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Devel
On 8 October 2015 at 12:50, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
>> I'm wondering if it makes sense to have some sort of systemd
>> meta package. I recently wondered very long where machinectl
>> was when I wanted to try machinectl shell...
>
> We added machin
Hello Marco!
Sadly i can't. I have not yet found a system or live-cd that would not
run into the described out-of-memory situation.
(i tried debian-stable live, gparted live, arch-stable live)
I thought i might be able to mask the partitions using the following rule:
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/00_
On Oct 12, Dieter wrote:
> Sadly i can't. I have not yet found a system or live-cd that would not run
> into the described out-of-memory situation.
> (i tried debian-stable live, gparted live, arch-stable live)
GRML does not use systemd yet, so it may work.
> I thought i might be able to mask th
On Oct 12, Dieter wrote:
>* What outcome did you expect instead?
> udev should issue a warning about a broken partition table
Can you attach a dump of the relevant MBR?
The first 512 bytes of the disk should be enough for a start.
Regards,
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP si
On 09/10/15 19:33, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The complete log dpkg log from the upgrade.
I didn't have time to try and replicate the issue with the
downgrade/upgrade again yet.
Attached there's the dpkg.log of the previous update (227-1 -> 227-2).
2015-10-09 16:54:56 startup packages configure
2015
12 matches
Mail list logo
