FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.8~repack2-1
Current version: 3.9~repack3-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.7~repack2-3
Current version: 3.8~repack2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.7~repack2-2
Current version: 3.7~repack2-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.6~repack2-3
Current version: 3.7~repack2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:29:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#820150: fixed in zam-plugins 3.7~repack2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #820150,
regarding zam-plugins: FTBFS[!linux]: Unsupported platform
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: zam-plugins
Version: 3.6~repack2-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
zam-plugins stopped building on kfreebsd and hurd due to some
platform-detection code that doesn't know about GNU/kFreeBSD or Hurd.
I suggest it treats tho
FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.5~repack0-7
Current version: 3.6~repack2-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
2015-10-27 17:45 GMT+01:00 Filipe Coelho :
> Hi there.
>
> I didn't know this was the case, so I'll check it out (thanks!).
> In any case the zam-plugins do not need that file so it can be removed (via
> the usual dfsg tarball deal).
Thank you for quick reply.
I didn
Hi there.
I didn't know this was the case, so I'll check it out (thanks!).
In any case the zam-plugins do not need that file so it can be removed
(via the usual dfsg tarball deal).
On 27.10.2015 16:41, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hi Damien and Filipe,
while updating zam-plugins fo
Hi Damien and Filipe,
while updating zam-plugins for debian I discovered license problem
with dpf/dgl/src/oui-blendish/resources/blender_icons.svg file.
LICENSE-blender_icons.svg.txt claim GPL-2 license but file itself is
copyrighted under the non-free license creative commons non-commercial
2015-10-25 6:28 GMT+01:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
> Hi all,
>
> upstream use git submodules now so debian/rules get-orig-source should
> be tuned accordingly.
> Can someone help me with this? I am bit short on time :(
> Please check README.md file.
I just pushed first (not working) attempt to update get-o
Hi all,
upstream use git submodules now so debian/rules get-orig-source should
be tuned accordingly.
Can someone help me with this? I am bit short on time :(
Please check README.md file.
best regards
nira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pk
FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.1-1
Current version: 3.5~repack0-7
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:50:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765617: fixed in zam-plugins 3.5~repack0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #765617,
regarding zam-plugins: building on non-Linux ports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: zam-plugins
Version: 3.5~repack0-4
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, 765...@bugs.debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hello,
The problem building zam-plugins on kfreebsd (and perhaps hurd) seems to
be very easily fixed, with the
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:56:37 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #753336,
regarding zam-plugins: New version upstream: 3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
lv2 and the headers
> I am using in zam-plugins 3.1
>
> The tweaks to the headers can be summarised as follows:
>
> (12:45:16) falktx: 1. extra support for clang deprecated
> (12:45:30) falktx: 2. always use const in atom when possible
> (12:45:42) falktx: 3. add missing extern &
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Alessio can you pls upload?
I guess I'm coming late, AFAICS it's already been uploaded.
Cool, thanks for the great work.
Laters!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubun
2014-07-13 10:05 GMT+02:00 Damien Zammit :
> On 05/07/14 17:57, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > just for completeness can you also elaborate embedded LADSPA, dssi and
> > vestige please?
> > To me it looks like at least ladspa is not needed to be embedded.
>
> You are correct, LADSPA possibly does not ne
Hi Jaromír,
On 05/07/14 17:57, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> just for completeness can you also elaborate embedded LADSPA, dssi and
> vestige please?
> To me it looks like at least ladspa is not needed to be embedded.
You are correct, LADSPA possibly does not need to be embedded because
the header file
ese plugins.
> The "existing" lv2 headers I need are from version svn917 as I am using
> some of the latest features of lv2.
>
> > could you please show the differences between upstream's headers
> > interface and your modified version?
> I have attached a di
2014-07-05 9:22 GMT+02:00 Matteo F. Vescovi :
>
> You're not allowed to upload to a suite where there's no package
> already.
>
Correct! ;)
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists
On 2014-07-05 at 09:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> my upload to experimental has been rejected. DM are not allowed upload to
> experimental.
Wrong.
You're not allowed to upload to a suite where there's no package
already.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi | Debian Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x806239
2014-07-04 11:44 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
>
> Jaromír, could you please upload the package to experimental first?
> I'd like to see some testing on it before pushing into unstable.
>
Hi Alessio,
my upload to experimental has been rejected. DM are not allowed upload to
experimental.
Please can
into unstable.
> >
> > Thanks all for the great work, cheers!
> >
> I think it's ready now.
Hi Damien,
here is a patch I am applying to pass CPPFLAGS ... you might be interested
apply it upstream too.
mira
Description: Pass CPPFLAGS.
Author: Jaromír
Hi Jaromír,
I have updated the git tag to 3.2 as requested.
On 04/07/14 19:44, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Jaromír, could you please upload the package to experimental first?
> I'd like to see some testing on it before pushing into unstable.
>
> Thanks all for the great work, cheers!
>
I think it'
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Damien Zammit wrote:
> Would it be possible to allow me to bundle these headers into these
> plugins as it already builds correctly, otherwise I might have to wait
> until lv2 svn917 is accepted into the repos, plus the tweaks, which may
> take a long time?
Thanks
ures of lv2.
> could you please show the differences between upstream's headers
> interface and your modified version?
I have attached a diff between the svn917 version of lv2 and the headers
I am using in zam-plugins 3.1
The tweaks to the headers can be summarised as follows:
(12:45:1
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> This new framework needs special lv2 extensions lv2-ext-ui and
If you were referring to:
http://lv2plug.in/ns/extensions/ui
Yes, we do have it in Debian from stable onwards.
>> lv2-programs which are not part of the official l
2014-07-03 5:07 GMT+02:00 Damien Zammit :
> On 02/07/14 03:46, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Few questions:
> > 1)
> > Are you still providing LADSPA plugins too?
> >
> > #install -t
> > /tmp/buildd/zam-plugins-3.1~repack0/debian/zam-plugins/usr/lib/ladspa
> &
On 02/07/14 03:46, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Few questions:
> 1)
> Are you still providing LADSPA plugins too?
>
> #install -t
> /tmp/buildd/zam-plugins-3.1~repack0/debian/zam-plugins/usr/lib/ladspa
> bin/*-ladspa.so
>
> if not ladspa dir also should be installed.
I ha
2014-06-30 19:26 GMT+02:00 Damien Zammit :
>
> I am the author of zam-plugins and I have made huge improvements
> to the package, such as providing GUIs for all plugins.
> Please consider updating to the new version upstream (3.1).
>
> The new version does not require any of t
2014-06-30 19:26 GMT+02:00 Damien Zammit :
>
> I am the author of zam-plugins and I have made huge improvements
> to the package, such as providing GUIs for all plugins.
> Please consider updating to the new version upstream (3.1).
>
> The new version does not require any of t
Package: zam-plugins
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I am the author of zam-plugins and I have made huge improvements
to the package, such as providing GUIs for all plugins.
Please consider updating to the new version upstream (3.1).
The new version does not require any of
FYI: The status of the zam-plugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 2.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
2013/12/19 Felipe Sateler
>
> Also, there is a new Standards-Version, please check if anything needs
> to be done.
>
I will. Thank you for upload.
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/17 Felipe Sateler
>>>
>>> > As regards lintian warnings ... upstream provide these files
>>> > not-executable
>>> > and there is dh_fixperms running which should fix
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/12/17 Felipe Sateler
>>
>> > As regards lintian warnings ... upstream provide these files
>> > not-executable
>> > and there is dh_fixperms running which should fix this kind of problems.
>> > Not sure in which stage of packaging
2013/12/17 Felipe Sateler
> > As regards lintian warnings ... upstream provide these files
> not-executable
> > and there is dh_fixperms running which should fix this kind of problems.
> > Not sure in which stage of packaging they became executable and how to
> fix
> > this :(
>
> They are instal
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/12/16 Felipe Sateler
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jaromír Mikeš
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Felipe,
>> >
>> > Fixed ;)
>> > Thank you for checking this.
>>
2013/12/16 Felipe Sateler
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jaromír Mikeš
> wrote:
> > Hi Felipe,
> >
> > Fixed ;)
> > Thank you for checking this.
>
>
> There are a few lintian warnings:
>
> W: zam-plugins: executable-not-elf-or-script
> usr/l
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Fixed ;)
> Thank you for checking this.
There are a few lintian warnings:
W: zam-plugins: executable-not-elf-or-script
usr/lib/lv2/zamtube.lv2/manifest.ttl
W: zam-plugins: executable-not-elf-or-script
usr/lib/l
Hi Felipe,
Fixed ;)
Thank you for checking this.
mira
2013/12/15 Felipe Sateler
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jaromír Mikeš
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/2 Jaromír Mikeš
> >>
> >>
> >> zam-plugins should be ready for uplo
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/12/2 Jaromír Mikeš
>>
>>
>> zam-plugins should be ready for upload.
>> Can some body review and if everything ok upload.
>>
>
> Nobody? :(
% gbp buildpackage
dh clean
dh_
2013/12/2 Jaromír Mikeš
>
> zam-plugins should be ready for upload.
> Can some body review and if everything ok upload.
>
>
Nobody? :(
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.
Hi,
zam-plugins should be ready for upload.
Can some body review and if everything ok upload.
best regards
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
2013/11/26 Adrian Knoth
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 03:07:00PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
> > > Package: wnpp
> > >> Severity: wishlist
> > >>
> > >> * Package name: zam-plugins
>
> > I am interested ... are you going to be
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 03:07:00PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >>
> >> * Package name: zam-plugins
> >>Version : git
> >>Upstream Author : Damien Zammit
> >> * URL
2013/11/23 Adrian Knoth
> On 11/23/13 20:24, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> * Package name: zam-plugins
>>Version : git
>>Upstream Author : Damien Zammit
>> * URL : http://www.zam
On 11/23/13 20:24, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zam-plugins
Version : git
Upstream Author : Damien Zammit
* URL : http://www.zamaudio.com/?p=870
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C/C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zam-plugins
Version : git
Upstream Author : Damien Zammit
* URL : http://www.zamaudio.com/?p=870
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C/C++
Description : Collection of LV2/LADSPA audio plugins for high
51 matches
Mail list logo
