Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:49:53AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 31, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:51:47AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I suggest we only drop the control.in

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-31 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 31, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:51:47AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >You edited debian/control, but Jonas added

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:51:47AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for >build-dependencies autogeneration

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-31 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:51, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for >> >build-dependencies autogeneration. I

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for > >build-dependencies autogeneration. If you disagree about the use of > >debian/control.in, we should d

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for build-dependencies autogeneration. If you disagree about the use of debian/control.in, we should disable it. If not, we should use it. But having it and not using it

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-29 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 16:29, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2010, at 4:09 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:09, Hans-Christoph Steiner >> wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 25, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 14:55, Hans-Christop

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 27, 2010, at 4:09 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 25, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 14:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fr

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Dec 25, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 14:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner >> wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300,

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-26 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 25, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 14:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner > w

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-25 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 14:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>> wrote: I just pushed some changes

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-24 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out binary package called 'cyclist'. As far as I

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out binary package called 'cyclist'.  As far as I understand it, I don't need to ITP this new 'cyclist' pa

Re: adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-24 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out binary > package called 'cyclist'.  As far as I understand it, I don't need to ITP > this new 'cyclist' package since its split off of the pd-cyclone source > package,

adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

2010-12-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out binary package called 'cyclist'. As far as I understand it, I don't need to ITP this new 'cyclist' package since its split off of the pd- cyclone source package, but it does need to go thru the NEW queue. 'cyclist' is a comm