* Adrian Bunk [2018-03-12 20:52]:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 09:18:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
...
openni2 (2.2.0.33+dfsg-10) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add patch for arm.
Thanks to Adrian Bunk (Closes: #874220)
...
Thanks a lot for fixing this bug for unstable.
It
Hi Vladimir,
I think we need some more information. Can you try it with an empty config? I.e.
mv ~/.config/gmusicbrowser/ gmusicbrowser_backup
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-mult
Source: openni
Followup-For: Bug #788680
Hi Gustavo,
thanks for the patch. Can you please clean it up (remove patches to
patches, backup files, other cruft), so I can apply it?
Thanks!
Jochen
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia
Package: primesense-nite-nonfree
Severity: important
Hi,
till now Openni serves a /var/lib/ni/licenses.xml with a Nite license¹.
Given that this is only needed for Nite and we got asked in #771053 why
it's included, I would propose to move the license (or rather the niReg
call) into primesense-ni
Package: primesense-nite-nonfree
Severity: important
Hi,
primesense-nite-nonfree is trying to download the Nite binaries from
openni.org, which is no longer available [1]. This makes this package
unusable. I've found copies of the .tar.bz2 here:
http://www.mira-project.org/downloads/3rdparty/bin-
Hi Tobi,
* Tobias Frost [2014-11-25 20:53]:
> built & uploaded!
Thanks!
> Please apply for the unblock.
Done: #771053
> (Note that I s/UNRELEASED/unstable in d/changelog; make sure to do this
> to in your repository)
Done.
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi Tobi,
thanks for the clearifications, I've pushed a new version. Can you have
a look again?
Cheers
Jochen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
h
Hi Tobi,
* Tobias Frost [2014-11-24 22:12]:
> Ok, pulled from the git and comparing to the version currently in
> Jessie:
> As we are in the freeze, you need to create targeted fixes for RC Bugs
> only.* So the doxygen one isn't.
This seems to be coming from a new Doxygen version and is only nee
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-25 11:08]:
> Uploaded! Let's hope ftp-masters likes it :)
Great, thanks :).
> Could you remove the patches which shouldn't be there? I wouldn't know which
> ones to keep and which to remove.
Done.
Cheers Jochen
__
Hi Hans-Christoph,
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-23 13:28]:
> * the descriptions in debian/control still mention avin2. Could you add
> something about what makes this 'pointclouds' fork different than the official
> one, and avin2?
Done in 579de11.
> * does openni-sensor-pointclouds confl
Hi,
* Hauke Wintjen [2013-11-21 09:30]:
> > Hans-Christoph Steiner hat am 20. November 2013 um 20:13
> > geschrieben:
> > Also, what tool are you building it with? I couldn't get it to build with
> > either dpkg-buildpackage or git-buildpackage.
>
> I have written in the wiki of my fork:
> gi
* IOhannes m zmoelnig [2013-11-21 10:37]:
> it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as
> they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing.
>
> if your package has not been in debian yet (which i think is true),
> you should get rid of any hacks like
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-04 14:20]:
> tarball to build the package from. Here's your git repo:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/openni-sensor-pointclouds.git;a=summary
I've just pushed an adapted version there. Can you have a look at it and
sponsor it, if it's ok?
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-04 19:59]:
> Having a dash in the upstream version number will make it tricky since the
> package version comes after a dash. Also, I think its good to have as simple
> tag names as possible. Since PrimeSense has long ones, this repo could use
> very short ones
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-04 14:20]:
> Looks good. Next step is tagging a release there, so there is an upstream
> tarball to build the package from.
I've just pushed Stable-5.1.0.41-pointclouds-1, can you import it?
Otherwise I can do it tomorrow.
> Here's your git repo:
>
> http://an
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-10-31 14:06]:
> So how about you make a repo that has all of the general patches in it, then
> we package that as 'openni-sensor-YOURNAMEHERE'. Then the Debian-specific
> patches, like for building against the system libjpeg, etc. will be in the
> packaging.
Good i
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-10-30 12:11]:
> Patches in a Debian package are not meant for adding new functionality. They
> are meant to get the code building/working/installing on Debian, and for
> fixing security bugs. So the package that includes those patches should be
> named after the so
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-10-29 10:10]:
> My question is more the opposite: when do people use the plain version without
> any of the avin2 patches? I think we should call the current package
> 'openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect', then leave it open for anyone to make the
> 'openni-sensor-pri
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-10-28 14:53]:
> OK, I'll give it one more look and upload it when I have some time. How
> about openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect? Is that still worth having as a
> separate package?
It's patches are integrated in openni-sensor-primesense.
__
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-10-28 13:26]:
> At long last, we finally did it! openni is officially part of Debian (and
> soon it'll be automatically included in Ubuntu).
Awesome!
> Also, is openni-sensor-primesense ready for upload? primesense-nite-nonfree
> is still waiting in the NEW queu
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-05-20 16:06]:
> How about openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect? Is that still relevant?
No, it's all integrated into openni-sensor-primesense, so it's working
with the original Primesense and the Kinect.
> Have any of these patches been submitted upstream? Things lik
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-05-20 14:44]:
> Ok, I uploaded openni-sensor-primesense and osceleton to Debian just now.
Awesome, thanks!
> What about primesense-nite-nonfree? Is there an updated version of that? Is
> that still needed?
I don't use it, so I haven't looked into packaging it. S
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2012-07-02 10:43]:
>
> On Jul 2, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > Great, I've been mailing with Stephen already to get this one into
> > Debian finally. According to [1] there are still some things to sort
> > out:
> > -
I just found out that you need commit c89f72b as well to make it work.
Cheers,
Jochen
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedi
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-134-g84d8671-9
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
current mplayer2 in sid loops endless with some HTTP files:
% mplayer -playlist http://httpmedia.radiobremen.de/nordwestradio.m3u
Resolving httpmedia.radiobremen.de for AF_INET6...
Couldn't resolve name for
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2011-06-19 00:07]:
>
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:07 +0200, "Jochen Sprickerhof"
> wrote:
> > * Hans-Christoph Steiner [2011-06-07 18:47]:
> > >
> > > On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > >
26 matches
Mail list logo
