Bug#752544: vlc: source package fails to compile

Control: reassign -1 src:glib2.0 2.40.0-4 Control: retitle -1 glib2.0: build gobject with -Wl,nodelete to prevent unloading Control: tags -1 = upstream fixed-upstream Control: affects -1 vlc Hi glib maintainers, vlc randomly fails to build during the generation of the plugin cache. Some of the p

Processed: Re: Bug#752544: vlc: source package fails to compile

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:glib2.0 2.40.0-4 Bug #752544 [vlc] vlc: source package fails to compile Bug reassigned from package 'vlc' to 'src:glib2.0'. No longer marked as found in versions vlc/2.1.4-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #752544 to the same values

libaudclient_3.5~rc2-1_i386.changes is NEW

binary:libaudclient-dev is NEW. source:libaudclient is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routin

Processing of libaudclient_3.5~rc2-1_i386.changes

libaudclient_3.5~rc2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libaudclient-dev_3.5~rc2-1_i386.deb libaudclient2_3.5~rc2-1_i386.deb libaudclient_3.5~rc2-1.dsc libaudclient_3.5~rc2.orig.tar.bz2 libaudclient_3.5~rc2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Deb

Processed: tagging 752544, bug 752544 is forwarded to https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/12039

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 752544 = pending Bug #752544 [vlc] vlc: source package fails to compile Removed tag(s) lfs. > forwarded 752544 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/12039 Bug #752544 [vlc] vlc: source package fails to compile Set Bug forwarded-to-address to '

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#752544: vlc: source package fails to compile

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #752544 [vlc] vlc: source package fails to compile Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags -1 + forwarded-upstream pending Unknown tag/s: forwarded-upstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi, 2014-08-27 16:52 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler : > > On Aug 27, 2014 10:43 AM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote: >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 09:52 +0200 schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi: >> > Libav for me, of course. >> >> I am for libav for the next stable release. However, I am open for >> anything el

Re: git-packaging workflows

On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Resurrecting an old thread >> >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Recently, Russ' blog post was echoed on http://planet.debian.org: >>> >>>

failed ppc64el build of mpeg2dec 0.5.1-5

* Source package: mpeg2dec * Version: 0.5.1-5 * Architecture: ppc64el * State: failed * Suite: sid * Builder: ppc64el1.debian.net * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=mpeg2dec&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.5.1-5&stamp=1409169421&file=log Please note that these notifications do not nec

Bug#759499: [guayadeque] crashes while scanning a collection

Package: guayadeque Version: 0.3.7~ds0-2.1 Severity: important One of my three collections makes crash guayadeque while scanning. This is the backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffdf7fe700 (LWP 4979)] __memcpy_sse2_unaligned () at ../sysdeps/x

guayadeque 0.3.7~ds0-2.1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the guayadeque source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.3.7~ds0-2.1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a da

libdvdnav 5.0.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the libdvdnav source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.2.1-3 Current version: 5.0.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei

Re: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel

Quoting Felipe Sateler (2014-08-27 17:19:27) > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at >> DebConf[1]. I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised >> the question about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I a

Re: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1]. > I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question > about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered "all in the list > of the bug report

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Aug 27, 2014 10:28 AM, "Felipe Sateler" wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Reinhard Tartler >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Benjamin Drung >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> there was a discussion on the

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Aug 27, 2014 10:43 AM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 09:52 +0200 schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi: > > Libav for me, of course. > > I am for libav for the next stable release. However, I am open for > anything else after that. To be honest, I recently find the sheer number

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 09:52 +0200 schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi: > Libav for me, of course. I am for libav for the next stable release. However, I am open for anything else after that. To be honest, I recently find the sheer number of "my bug instantly vanished once I replaced libav with ffmpe

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> Hi, >> >> there was a discussion on the debian-devel mailing list about >> reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian [1]. The security team made clear [2] >> that they will only support one p

libaudclient_3.5~rc2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately you forgot to update your debian/copyright after the split and the new license is missing. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Quoting Benjamin Drung (2014-08-27 00:36:09) > Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? For upcoming Jessie release: Libav (too risky to change this late!) > Can we reach a consensus on this topic? Highly doubtful - expect us to only reach democratic majority. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - ideal

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

2014-08-27 11:40 GMT+02:00 Chris Bannister : > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2014-08-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Matteo F. Vescovi : >> > Hi Team! >> > >> > On 2014-08-27 at 00:36 (CEST), Benjamin Drung wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> So I am asking you: Should we

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:54:09AM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi, > > 2014-08-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Matteo F. Vescovi : > > Hi Team! > > > > On 2014-08-27 at 00:36 (CEST), Benjamin Drung wrote: > >> [...] > >> > >> So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a > >> consensus on

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Matteo, 2014-08-27 11:11 GMT+02:00 Matteo F. Vescovi : > Hi! > > On 2014-08-27 at 10:54 (CEST), Bálint Réczey wrote: >> If the definition of being crazy is something close to being >> irrational then making decisions based only on sunken costs can hardly >> be shown to be the opposite. :-) >> >

mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:05:35 +0200 Source: mpv Binary: mpv mpv-dbg libmpv1 libmpv-dev libmpv-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.5.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Processing of mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes

mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb mpv-dbg_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb libmpv1_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb libmpv-dev_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb libmpv-dbg_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb mpv_0.5.1-1.dsc mpv_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz mpv_0.5.1-1.debian.tar.xz Gre

Processing of mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes

mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: mpv_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb mpv-dbg_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb libmpv1_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb libmpv-dev_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb libmpv-dbg_0.5.1-1_amd64.deb mpv_0.5.1-1.dsc mpv_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz mpv_0.5.1-1.debian

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi! On 2014-08-27 at 10:54 (CEST), Bálint Réczey wrote: > If the definition of being crazy is something close to being > irrational then making decisions based only on sunken costs can hardly > be shown to be the opposite. :-) > > OTOH it is very human. :-) Don't get me wrong: it's clear that if

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi, 2014-08-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Matteo F. Vescovi : > Hi Team! > > On 2014-08-27 at 00:36 (CEST), Benjamin Drung wrote: >> [...] >> >> So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a >> consensus on this topic? > > Libav for me, of course. > I've spent too much time on getting it

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Hi Team! On 2014-08-27 at 00:36 (CEST), Benjamin Drung wrote: > [...] > > So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a > consensus on this topic? Libav for me, of course. I've spent too much time on getting it working fine with Blender that it'd be crazy to change it now. ;

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Thanks for bringing this up. I vote libav. Cheers. sent via mobile ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers