Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Reinhard, On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development you probably want to switch to using it, too. In

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi, On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more > than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in > debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package that builds > against the ffmpeg packages curren

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 28, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Moreover, I am curious why I haven't seen you working on libavcodec > bugs in Debian before, and why do you believe you can do a better job > with the ffmpeg package currently on NEW? Why should he work on libavcodec when he (along with many other people) wan

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? >The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development >you probably want to switch to using it, too. In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he i

Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-27 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi all, some of you may have noticed a weird ffmpeg package in the NEW queue[1]. Let me explain: In 2011 Libav[2] was forked from FFmpeg[3]. It was a time of great uncertainty, the fork happened with much drama that didn't help making a technical cut, and at that peculiar time Debian switched to

Bug#750199: xbmc: No Video but audio and subtitiles

2014-07-27 Thread Carlos Ramos
Package: xbmc Version: 2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 Hello, I can confirm this problem. The package vdpau-va-driver is installed by default with xbmc now, but the problem is not fixed. Sound and subtitles are good, but video is just black when output is anything ff-*-vdpau, the output ff-h264-vaapi does wor

Bug#756174: jackd2 building without any of the required build flags

2014-07-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-07-27 16:24:11) >> Given that this support is not in place, I wonder if CDBS is the best >> helper infrastructure for this package. > > I don't follow your logic here, Reinhard. CDBS _does_ have support for

Bug#756174: jackd2 building without any of the required build flags

2014-07-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-07-27 16:24:11) > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Langasek > wrote: >> Package: jackd2 >> Version: 1.9.10+20140610git97e0e80b~dfsg-1 >> Severity: important >> Tags: patch >> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com >> Usertags: origin-ubuntu utopic ubuntu-patch >>

camorama 0.19-3 MIGRATED to testing

2014-07-27 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the camorama source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.19-2.3 Current version: 0.19-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv

Bug#756174: jackd2 building without any of the required build flags

2014-07-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: jackd2 > Version: 1.9.10+20140610git97e0e80b~dfsg-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu utopic ubuntu-patch > > The jackd2 package in Debian unstable does not properly

Re: Help needed packing new Version of QasTools

2014-07-27 Thread Sebastian Holtermann
Am 27.07.2014 07:33, schrieb Alessio Treglia: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to upload a new version of QasTools but it has >> been a while since I built the last package and I'm >> pretty much out of the package building workflow >> and cou

tap-plugins-doc_20140526-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-07-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:30:58 +0200 Source: tap-plugins-doc Binary: tap-plugins-doc Architecture: source all Version: 20140526-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: J

Re: [SCM] tap-plugins-doc/master: Patch patch fixing privacy-breach.

2014-07-27 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2014-07-27 13:12 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher : > > Simply removing all of it is not the intention of the lintian tag. > Please replace the tags which cause the privacy-breach-* tags to > be emitted with plain text. Something like the attached patch should do > it. > Fixed. Thank you! best rega

Processing of tap-plugins-doc_20140526-2_amd64.changes

2014-07-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
tap-plugins-doc_20140526-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tap-plugins-doc_20140526-2_all.deb tap-plugins-doc_20140526-2.dsc tap-plugins-doc_20140526-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) _

Re: [SCM] tap-plugins-doc/master: Patch patch fixing privacy-breach.

2014-07-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2014-07-25 10:04:33, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit 08f0a58667b5af74373e7cb2ee155edf23e20957 > Author: Jaromír Mikeš > Date: Fri Jul 25 12:04:23 2014 +0200 > > Patch patch fixing privacy-breach. > > diff --