On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-07-27 16:24:11)
>> Given that this support is not in place, I wonder if CDBS is the best
>> helper infrastructure for this package.
>
> I don't follow your logic here, Reinhard. CDBS _does_ have support for
> waf (this package just doesn't make use of that) and (from a brief look)
> it seems to me that short-form dh does _not_ have support for waf, so I
> fail to understand how CDBS should be ditched for this reason.
>
> Did you perhaps simply misread Steve's email?
Quite likely that's the case. I was not aware of waf.mk, and I
wouldn't have suggested the above if I had known. I have to apologize.
Maybe you could perhaps help with revising the jackd2 packaging to use wak.mk?
Again, sorry for any confusion I might have caused.
--
regards,
Reinhard
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
