Hallo
dies ist ein Elektronik-Unternehmen
das Unternehmen verkaufen haupts?chlich iPhone, iPad, Kamera, Rolex-Uhr,
MacBook .
der Preis ist sehr niedriger
W e b; mndlrrr.com
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@li
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 16:44 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> The correct parameter to use is -pp and:
> $ yafaray-xml -pp /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins /yafarayRender.xml
> works fine here.
> So, closing.
Ah, thanks!
In that case the real problem is with the man page which says
-p path
01.08.2012 в 09:45:12 +0100 Adam D. Barratt написал:
> On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this
> >separately?
>
> The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard
> said he was going to upload -6. That bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 660700 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at
startup when activated
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641'
from 'http
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 660700 grave
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at
startup when activated
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream
Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-no
severity 660700 grave
tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream
merge 662628 660700
thanks
Am Montag, den 30.07.2012, 19:23 +0200 schrieb gregor herrmann:
> The upstream trac instance claims that the bug is fixed since
> yesterday including a commit (actually a revert):
>
> http://git.videolan.org/
Your message dated Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:44:57 +0200
with message-id <20120801144457.GA6118@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#683465: yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path
has caused the Debian Bug report #683465,
regarding yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path
to be marked as done.
This means
On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a
quick
look at the diff I'm not prepare
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some
discussio
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any help needed for this update? Alessio seems to be the only active
> member of the git repo, and I could help.
Cool, please do!
> Also, where is it possible to see the 2 'official' maintainers of a
> package?
Actually, I real
On 2012-08-01 10:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
>> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
>>>
>>> The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
>>> look at the diff
11 matches
Mail list logo