01.08.2012 в 09:45:12 +0100 Adam D. Barratt написал: > On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > >So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this > >separately? > > The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard > said he was going to upload -6. That bug also contains some > discussion which suggests the previous m-a:foreign changes were > incorrect. In any case, let's move the discussion there, please. > :-)
These multi-arch changes were correct (the packages cannot be "Multi-Arch: foreign" because they provide architecture-specific interface) but not ideal (architecture-specific packages should not be "Architecture: all"). And problems created by this non-ideality are mitigated by general uselessness of the packages (they are intented to transition packages which were never in stable). Also, multi-arch changes were described correctly in the changelog before http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commitdiff;h=677532340a55be1e0974de241f06aa605e2be083 The architecture change of libav-extra-dbg (with libav-regular-dbg forgotten again) was in fact related to #680602, not #680613. And it also creates architecture-dependent "Architecture: all" package problems. Which are again mitigated by uselessness of the package (it is not only intended to transition from package not found in stable, but also does not have reverse dependencies). _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
