Hi Jürgen,
I am one of those who maintain the Audacious package.
I am working on getting Audacious 2.4.4 into Debian Unstable. Right now
the situation is like this:
Unstable: Audacious 2.3
Experimental: Audacious 2.4.3
Within 1 week, I'll get Audacious 2.4.4 into Debian Unstable hence
making th
My name is Ms Anita Yousuf from London, I have an Important discussion I will
like to have with you. Its private and
Urgent please kindly Contact me on my email at
anitayou...@gmail.com
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multime
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 22:59:22 (CET), Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:24:22PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 21:55:14 (CET), ghedo-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>> > c
Hello Debian Audacious Packagers!
Is it possible the package audacious version 2.4.3 from Debian
experimental move to Debian Unstable? The package audacious with
version 2.3 know, a tumble while doing instabilities online streams
with long maturity. The version of the package audacious from Debian
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:16, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 13:03:07 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2011 12:57, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>>> May I take this as indication that mplayer2 fails the 'is there interest
>>> in pkg-multimedia' test?
>>
>> Maybe we shou
serd_0~svn128-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
serd_0~svn128-1.dsc
serd_0~svn128.orig.tar.bz2
serd_0~svn128-1.debian.tar.gz
libserd-dev_0~svn128-1_all.deb
libserd0_0~svn128-1_amd64.deb
serdi_0~svn128-1_amd64.deb
serd-dbg_0~svn128-1_amd64.deb
Gr
Accepted:
libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-qt-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
to main/p/projectm/libprojectm-qt1_2.0.1+dfsg-
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lv2-c++-tools_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override
says utils.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, de
Accepted:
libpaq-dev_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
to main/l/lv2-c++-tools/libpaq-dev_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
libpaq0_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
to main/l/lv2-c++-tools/libpaq0_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
lv2-c++-tools-doc_1.0.4-2_all.deb
to main/l/lv2-c++-tools/lv2-c++-tools-doc_1.0.4-2_all.deb
lv2-c++-tools_1.0.4-2.debian.t
Accepted:
libass-dev_0.9.11-1_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libass/libass-dev_0.9.11-1_amd64.deb
libass4_0.9.11-1_amd64.deb
to main/liba/libass/libass4_0.9.11-1_amd64.deb
libass_0.9.11-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/liba/libass/libass_0.9.11-1.debian.tar.gz
libass_0.9.11-1.dsc
to main/liba/libass/liba
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:24:22PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 21:55:14 (CET), ghedo-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
> wrote:
>
> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> > commit c13b7176fe7823bead9078961696295f94ff26e7
> > Author: Alessandro Ghed
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 21:55:14 (CET), ghedo-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit c13b7176fe7823bead9078961696295f94ff26e7
> Author: Alessandro Ghedini
> Date: Wed Mar 23 20:55:45 2011 +0100
>
> update *.symbols files f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 619325 libqtgui4
Bug #619325 [vlc] menus not displayed after moving to the second screen
Bug reassigned from package 'vlc' to 'libqtgui4'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions vlc/1.1.7-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
reassign 619325 libqtgui4
thanks
#include
* Christophe Mutricy [Tue, Mar 22 2011, 11:53:03PM]:
> Le Tue 22 Mar 11 à 23:19 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > Package: vlc
>
> > Result: menu controls appear sunken, but the menu itself does not
> > appear. It doesn't appear on the first monitor eith
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 20:46:23 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:34:10PM +, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org
> wrote:
>>The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>>commit 87bd02afb36a8fe3a4074d7a45e5e407a21c9541
>>Author: Reinhard Tartler
>>Date:
projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7.dsc
projectm_2.0.1+dfsg-7.debian.tar.gz
libprojectm2_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
libprojectm-dev_2.0.1+dfsg-7_i386.deb
projectm-data_2.0.1+dfsg-7_all.deb
libvisual-projectm_2.0.1+
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:34:10PM +, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 87bd02afb36a8fe3a4074d7a45e5e407a21c9541
Author: Reinhard Tartler
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:02:28 2011 +0100
cleanup cruft from libass build
Hmm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 619397 + pending
Bug #619397 [redlandmm-utils] redlandmm-utils: seems either package name or
description is wrong
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
619397: http://bugs.deb
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:24:44PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:19:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:2
Hi,
most work has been done, it would be very appreciated if someone can
allocate some time to take a second look at debian/copyright before
uploading the package.
Cheers,
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer
FYI: The status of the liblo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.26~repack-5
Current version: 0.26~repack-7
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wi
FYI: The status of the jack-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.0.2-7
Current version: 20101210-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
Package: redlandmm-utils
Severity: minor
Package name is ...-utils but both short and long description mentions
"debugging symbols" which is commonly named sd ...-dbg.
Please consider changing either name or description.
- Jonas
___
pkg-multimedia
severity 616080 important
thanks
This bug is not reproducible if accelerated graphics are enabled.
alessio@alessio-laptop:~$ glxinfo | grep render
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RV730 9480) 20090101 TCL DRI2
Cheers,
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotregl
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:11:42PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
This looks bad. If it really really must use a specific version of a
specific implementation (as opposed to a supposedly coordinated
feature which might happen to only be
Hi,
this seems no longer reproducible with the latest 0.9+bzr12-2 release
available in Debian sid.
Can you confirm that?
Cheers,
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:57:02AM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
My gut feeling is that we shouldn't do this and wait for a sane
multiarch solution. AFAIK, it's currently being worked on.
Correct.
ia32-libs is a dirty hack which is expected by next release of Debian to
be replaced by proper mult
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> This looks bad. If it really really must use a specific version of a
> specific implementation (as opposed to a supposedly coordinated feature
> which might happen to only be available yet in a single implementation) then
> I strongly re
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Beware that DEP5 have been maintained in multiple VCSes - luckily (to my
> knowledge) only one of each kind (Subversion, Bazaar). so it is IMO best to
> mention explicitly which kind used if mentioning revision number.
Ok, thanks.
--
A
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:44:13AM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Needs libjack-jackd2-dev (>= 1.9.6~dfsg.1-5)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 8af2f59..e235207 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Priority: optional
Maintainer: De
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:50:37AM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Spec update
diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index e57a2b4..11a4b91 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Format: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:35:40PM +0100, steph5150 wrote:
> hi,
Hi!
> Proposal concerning jackd1 and libjack0 packages for amd64:
jackd1's libjack0 is part of ia32-libs.
The whole situation isn't really satisfying, given that we want users to
switch between jackd1 and jackd2 transparently.
I
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:24:44PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:19:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:29:04AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> >I'm working on Ecasound's copyright fil
lv2-c++-tools_1.0.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lv2-c++-tools_1.0.4-2.dsc
lv2-c++-tools_1.0.4-2.debian.tar.gz
lv2-c++-tools_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
libpaq0_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
libpaq-dev_1.0.4-2_amd64.deb
lv2-c++-tools-doc_1.0.4-2_all.deb
Greetings,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:24:44PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:19:55PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:29:04AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > >I'm working on Ecasound's copyright file. Would like to ask for a
> > >review.
> > >
> > >This project h
Accepted:
redlandmm-dev_0~svn2786-1_all.deb
to main/r/redlandmm/redlandmm-dev_0~svn2786-1_all.deb
redlandmm-utils_0~svn2786-1_amd64.deb
to main/r/redlandmm/redlandmm-utils_0~svn2786-1_amd64.deb
redlandmm_0~svn2786-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/r/redlandmm/redlandmm_0~svn2786-1.debian.tar.gz
redl
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:43:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#611791: fixed in libmms 0.6-1+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #611791,
regarding libmms0: libmms alignment problems on ARM
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
libmms-dev_0.6-1+squeeze1_i386.deb
to main/libm/libmms/libmms-dev_0.6-1+squeeze1_i386.deb
libmms0_0.6-1+squeeze1_i386.deb
to main/libm/libmms/libmms0_0.6-1+squeeze1_i386.deb
libmms_0.6-1+squeeze1.diff.gz
to main/libm/libmms/libmms_0.6-1
libass_0.9.11-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libass_0.9.11-1.dsc
libass_0.9.11.orig.tar.bz2
libass_0.9.11-1.debian.tar.gz
libass-dev_0.9.11-1_amd64.deb
libass4_0.9.11-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franc
39 matches
Mail list logo
