Am 09.08.2010 18:06, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
The log for #579025 also suggests that fixing it would require
rebuilding reverse dependencies; is that the case?
No, that's mistakable from the bug log. In order for the fix to have
effect on a package (which is going to be built without an instal
On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:14:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yee haw! I'm going to work thru the final kinks in the upstream
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:14:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yee haw! I'm going to work thru the final kinks in the upstream SVN
where I have been doing the development/packaging so
FYI: The status of the ardour source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:2.8.9-1
Current version: 1:2.8.11-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:11 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 05/08/10 23:51, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 20:52 -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Hans-Cristoph,
On Thu,
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:45 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> the pkg-multimedia team has just uploaded a revised flac_1.2.1-3
> package to unstable. This packages contains fixes for two bugs
> (#579025 and #585518) which unfortunately required an autoreconf of
> the build system. The autore
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:26:38AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Probably. So, if there was no actual technical work involved, we'll just
> start from your definitions.
OK.
> > for each project. However I would recommend to keep all the tasks files
> > in one place just to enable easier genera
Dear Release Team,
the pkg-multimedia team has just uploaded a revised flac_1.2.1-3
package to unstable. This packages contains fixes for two bugs
(#579025 and #585518) which unfortunately required an autoreconf of
the build system. The autoreconf result is applied by means of a
patch, which
Your message dated Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:32:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#579025: fixed in flac 1.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #579025,
regarding libflac-dev: libFLAC.m4 may set empty -L flag
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Accepted:
flac_1.2.1-3.diff.gz
to main/f/flac/flac_1.2.1-3.diff.gz
flac_1.2.1-3.dsc
to main/f/flac/flac_1.2.1-3.dsc
flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
to main/f/flac/flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++-dev_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
to main/f/flac/libflac++-dev_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++6_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
t
On 09/08/10 06:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
>> can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
>> merged into this one (d-multime...@lists.d
[quoting myself in parts]
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:01:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> That's perfectly fine. So I will move any imaging related stuff to some
> Debian Imaging area which I will keep on maintaining for my own purposes
This is just done and the imaging stuff is not any more
flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flac_1.2.1-3.dsc
flac_1.2.1-3.diff.gz
libflac-doc_1.2.1-3_all.deb
flac_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac8_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac-dev_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++6_1.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libflac++-dev_1.2.1-3_am
On 09/08/10 04:57, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Please someone upload FLAC asap (from the master branch). It kills two
> bugs that I'd like to have fixed in Squeeze. The other changes are
> rather cosmetic, so I believe it is still feasible to convince the
> release team for its inclusion in Squeeze.
Wrong bug number.
vocproc needs to rebuild against latest libpaq.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alessio Treglia
Date: Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:16 PM
Subject:
To: 592...@bugs.debian.org
This needs a rebuild.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.ale
This needs a rebuild.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
> can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
> merged into this one (d-multime...@lists.debian.org).
Thanks for reminding me that the
Please someone upload FLAC asap (from the master branch). It kills two
bugs that I'd like to have fixed in Squeeze. The other changes are
rather cosmetic, so I believe it is still feasible to convince the
release team for its inclusion in Squeeze.
- Fabian
___
Am 08.08.2010 00:34, schrieb Andres Mejia:
The audiocd kioslave uses the lame frontend.
Some links relevant to the issue.
http://osdir.com/ml/kde-commits/2010-02/msg05221.html
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230026
WTF, they really use the lame frontend (and rely on specific compile
time o
Am 06.08.2010 17:17, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
Sorry, I forgot about this one. Building it now...
Nevermind, thanks for the upload!
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debia
20 matches
Mail list logo
