On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:14:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yee haw! I'm going to work thru the final kinks in the upstream
SVN where I have been doing the development/packaging so far.
Then I'll upload them.
I believe I speak for the team if I say we prefer if you work
directly on the git repository, because then interested people can
look at the commit logs via de commits mailing list.
Yes, that's my plan. So far, I've been doing the debian
development in the upstream SVN. I thought it made the most sense
to finish up the initial work there, so there is a coherent history
there. Then once I submit the package to Debian, switch it over to
the pkg-multimedia git. Does that make sense?
It does (to me, at least), if only you make sure to split it
properly: Debian subdir in "master" branch and "upstream" branch
either not contain that same subdir or packaging done with source
format 3.0 - as I believe that automagically suppresses upstream
debian subdir.
- Jonas
There is a 'make dist' which makes the tarball without the 'debian'
subdir, then there is 'make dpkg-source' which makes the source
package in 3.0 quilt format. This is part of the Pd library template.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is
publicity. - Bill Moyers
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
