Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version would
>> be preferred over a more featureful one.
> Unfortunately, this is only half of the story. For the occasional use of
> jack, jackd2 is e
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:53:48PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
There is a problem, though. The library names collide, so one would
have to have libjack1-0 and libjack2-0. This would mean that the
shlibs files would have to provide alterna
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> There is a problem, though. The library names collide, so one would
>> have to have libjack1-0 and libjack2-0. This would mean that the
>> shlibs files would have to provide alternative dependencies (like
>> ffmpeg is doing for the unstripp
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:02:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#570508: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #570508,
regarding debian/watch for a52dec does not work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:02:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#566385: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #566385,
regarding a52dec: Uploaders field not correctly written
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Accepted:
libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
li
Accepted:
a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:24:19PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What I propose is to ship the new code as a separate source package
and a separate binary package. The binary package will conflict with
the similar binary package provided
a52dec_0.7.4-14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
libquicktime_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libquicktime_1.1.5-1.dsc
libquicktime_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz
libquicktime_1.1.5-1.diff.gz
libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
quicktim
(new) ambdec_0.4.2-1.diff.gz optional sound
(new) ambdec_0.4.2-1.dsc optional sound
(new) ambdec_0.4.2-1_i386.deb optional sound
Ambisonic decoder for first and second order
AmbDec is an Ambisonics decoder for up to 36 speakers. It can be used
for both horizontal and full 3-D systems of first, se
ambdec_0.4.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ambdec_0.4.2-1.dsc
ambdec_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz
ambdec_0.4.2-1.diff.gz
ambdec_0.4.2-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
__
Send Your details for the claims of your won prize awarded to you by the Lottery
Board, providing your full information
Names
Address
Country
Lottery Board
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:24:43PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Also, if my understanding is correct
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correc
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with jack1,
> >> so no library transition
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with
jack1, so no library transition is needed.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 17:13:14 (CET), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
>>> I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
>>
>> So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make j
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with jack1,
>> so no library transition is needed.
>
> That was my impression too. If so, why don't we ship *b
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:55, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version
would be preferred over a more featureful one.
FYI: The status of the idjc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.8.1-3
Current version: 0.8.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
la
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:55, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
>> I would think that at this stage of Linux audio, trying to do pro
>> audio with a stable release of debian is nuts.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
>> I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
>
> So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
> default post-squeeze and kindly ask the backports team to provi
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
> I would think that at this stage of Linux audio, trying to do pro
> audio with a stable release of debian is nuts.
Not really. ardour-2.8.7, calf-plugins and ffado will be
Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
default post-squeeze and kindly ask the backports team to provide
jack2 packages for squeeze afterwards.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffra
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature
> > perspective, I'd go for jackd2.
> >
> > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
> What are other distros doing? What are the plans for fedora, ge
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:54, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we
>> should communicate this ASAP!
>
> Let's put it this way: we know that jackd1 is stable, so i
Am 17.03.2010 15:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'll make a note to upload them soon.
Thanks.
Still, I don't think we should try to switch. E.g. I know that current
mplayer rc3 will not work with ffmpeg 0.6, and I have no idea what else
might break.
Alright, fine with me.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fab
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:54:12 (CET), Adrian Knoth wrote:
> From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature
> perspective, I'd go for jackd2.
>
> So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
What are other distros doing? What are the plans for fedora, gentoo and
opensu
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:48:30 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 17.03.2010 14:42, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> What is our status regarding squeeze?
>
> For the packages that I have my hands in, I'd recommend to upload a52dec
> ASAP to get rid of two minor but annoying bugs (#566385 and
> #57
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi!
> How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we
> should communicate this ASAP!
Let's put it this way: we know that jackd1 is stable, so it qualifies
for a release.
If we vote against jackd2, we're mi
Am 17.03.2010 14:42, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
What is our status regarding squeeze?
For the packages that I have my hands in, I'd recommend to upload
a52dec ASAP to get rid of two minor but annoying bugs (#566385 and
#570508). Also, I have prepared packages for the new upstream version
of l
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42:58 (CET), Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
What is our status regarding squeeze?
AFAIUI ffmpeg is done, and I'm not aware of similar pending library
transitions, read: no f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use
> the package
> severity 524805 grave
Bug #524805 [mplayer] mplayer: CVE-2009-0385 integer signedness error
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping p
severity 574280 wishlist
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less confusing
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Peter Wiersig wrote:
sample session:
> ~$ rip drive
> Usage: rip drive [command]
>
> Use --help to get a list of commands.
> ~$ rip drive --help
> Us
severity 574280 wishlist
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less confusing
thanks
[sent again, properly cc'ed cont...@bugs.debian.org this time]
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Peter Wiersig wrote:
sample session:
> ~$ rip drive
> Usage: rip drive [command
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 574280 wishlist
Bug #574280 [morituri] morituri: advertises --help on error messages, but that
option provides no fuerther information
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'minor'
> retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less c
Package: morituri
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: minor
sample session:
> ~$ rip drive
> Usage: rip drive [command]
>
> Use --help to get a list of commands.
> ~$ rip drive --help
> Usage:
> rip [OPTION...] - GStreamer initialization
>
> Help Options:
> -h, --help
40 matches
Mail list logo
