On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:54, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Hi! > >> How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we >> should communicate this ASAP! > > Let's put it this way: we know that jackd1 is stable, so it qualifies > for a release. > > If we vote against jackd2, we're missing SMP enabled audio processing > and jackdbus. Nothing really important, but users might want to use it > in a few months, e.g. for ladish. > > If we go for jackd2, I still have to push some FFADO changes to jackd2's > firewire backend and fix the manpage issue. Simple stuff, one hour of > work. > > I don't have strong feelings for either version. > > > From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature > perspective, I'd go for jackd2. > > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
I would think that at this stage of Linux audio, trying to do pro audio with a stable release of debian is nuts. On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version would be preferred over a more featureful one. So I would go with jack1 for squeeze. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
