If there are good chances of this being mistaken... Add an inline comment
in the relevant place: that would more likely prevent people mistaking
things...
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, 6:57 pm Jonas Smedegaard, wrote:
> Please beware that some packages "missing" some simple tasks may have
> good reason fo
Please beware that some packages "missing" some simple tasks may have
good reason for that.
As a concrete example, source package jsbundle-web-interfaces "lack" a
Homepage in control file, and an Upstream-Name in copyright file - both
because that is nonsense for a bundle-only package - none of
