severity 586149 serious
retitle 586149 Conflict between hdf5-tools and libhdf5-mpi-dev prevents several
packages from building
block 661301 by 586149
thanks
Hi again,
Because this causes other packages to FTBFS, it really needs to be an RC
bug.
-Adam
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 00:12 -0500, Adam C
Hi,
There's a better way to do this by just having different shared library
file names and sonames for each of the shared library packages. Then
the -dev packages can conflict, while one can install multiple packages
using the different shared libraries simultaneously, not one-at-a-time
as update
Hi Anton,
[Just addressing d-s-m since I think we're all subscribed, and adding
the HDF5 maintainers.]
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:00 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there is a problem with installing paraview and gmsh together in sid now.
> gmsh requires libpetsc3.2, which is dependent on
Hello again,
Please discard the last patch, a better one is attached.
-Adam
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:57 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: libhdf5-mpi-dev
> Version: 1.8.4-patch1-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Greetings,
>
> The libhdf5-mpi-dev packa
x: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog (revision 2951)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+hdf5 (1.8.4-patch1-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Adam C. Powell, IV ]
+ * Correct the libhdf5-mpi-de
Thank you Francesco for taking care of this!
-Adam
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Dear Francesco,
>
> This patch has been available since early February now, and without it a
> number of packages are blocked. Those include new packages for Salomé
>
help?
-Adam
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 09:29 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> tags 510057 +patch
> thanks
>
> Hello Francesco,
>
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 14:28 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:10 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > That
Hi Manuel and GIS devs,
Just FYI, Manuel, Francesco has indicated that he would rather continue
to build all flavors of hdf5 for squeeze in bug 510057, so it's not
likely that this bug will be closed by the squeeze release.
That said, if 510057 is closed, it will give the reverse-depends an
mpi-d
block 566828 by 510057
thanks
Because it is impossible to install more than one MPI version of HDF5 at
the same time, it will be impossible to make an MPI version of MED
before there is an mpi-defaults version of HDF5.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
tags 510057 +patch
thanks
Hello Francesco,
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 14:28 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:10 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > That said, a patch for add mpi-defaults to current support
> > is of course welcome.
>
> Okay, I wi
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:10 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 05:11:40AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Because MPICH1 and LAM are long since end-of-life, this is taking on a
> > new urgency. The Debian Science team i
Greetings,
Because MPICH1 and LAM are long since end-of-life, this is taking on a
new urgency. The Debian Science team is planning to deprecate the LAM
and MPICH1 packages for squeeze, and remove them entirely for squeeze+1.
[1] For this reason, a package built against mpi-defaults should be the
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 17:05 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:52:18AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > On 1 February 2009 at 00:37, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > | Hello Dirk,
> > |
> > | On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:10:04PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > |
> >
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.6.6-3
Greetings,
I'm afraid your rules file doesn't build openmpi libraries on the
architectures where it's supposed to, so the openmpi packages are empty.
Looking through the build logs on every architecture where it's supposed
to work (amd64, ia64, sparc, powerpc), if I
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 15:31 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:51:53AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 15:07 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:14
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 15:07 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:14 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 06:56:11AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:34 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergi
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 09:58 -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It should be fixed now with 1.6.5-5.2 - ateast the build logs now
> > show correct dependencies for hdf5-tools.
>
> Yeah, -5.2 looks good; thanks!
Oh, look at that, you'd already uploaded 5.2
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 11:57 -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: libhdf5-serial-1.6.5-0
> Version: 1.6.5-5.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 8.6.4
>
> libhdf5-serial-1.6.5-0's shlibs file (generated from debian/shlibs.in
> AFAICT) omits the newly added h5test library; as a result, hd
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.6.5-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Greetings,
The binary h5perf in the hdf5-tools package requires the library
libh5test-1.6.5.so.0 which is not in any binary package. With
hdf5-tools installed, this results in:
# /usr/bin/h5perf
h5perf: error while loading shared libra
Hi again,
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:14 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 06:56:11AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:34 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:26:10PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:34 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:26:10PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:04 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > As OpenMPI is the successor to LAM (the LAM developers now work on
> > &
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 21:26 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:04 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > As OpenMPI is the successor to LAM (the LAM developers now work on
> > OpenMPI), please add an OpenMPI build of hdf5.
>
> Will you accept a patch if I p
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:04 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> As OpenMPI is the successor to LAM (the LAM developers now work on
> OpenMPI), please add an OpenMPI build of hdf5.
Will you accept a patch if I provide one?
Cheers,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.6.5-5
Severity: wishlist
Greetings,
As OpenMPI is the successor to LAM (the LAM developers now work on
OpenMPI), please add an OpenMPI build of hdf5.
Thanks,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open s
24 matches
Mail list logo