On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello all,
>
> [context: the newest clc does not longer add
> /usr/share/common-lisp/systems to asdf:*central-registry*]
>
> Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:40 AM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello all,
[context: the newest clc does not longer add
/usr/share/common-lisp/systems to asdf:*central-registry*]
Desmond O. Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Luca Capello wrote:
>> I still consider this a regression, since previo
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:42:07 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
>> Tamas Papp wrote:
>>> I thought I would write before filing a bug report. Apparently
>>> /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ is not in asdf:*central-registry* any
>>> mor
Hi there!
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:42:07 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> Tamas Papp wrote:
>> I thought I would write before filing a bug report. Apparently
>> /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ is not in asdf:*central-registry* any
>> more by default. Of course adding it manually fixes this, but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Tamas,
Tamas Papp wrote:
> I thought I would write before filing a bug report. Apparently
> /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ is not in asdf:*central-registry* any
> more by default. Of course adding it manually fixes this, but it used
> to be
Hi,
I thought I would write before filing a bug report. Apparently
/usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ is not in asdf:*central-registry* any
more by default. Of course adding it manually fixes this, but it used
to be there -- is this change intentional? I don't know whether it
was added by sbcl or
