Thanks! I'll check autopkgtest.
- Original Message -
> [I'm putting back the Common Lisp team in CC]
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:52:27AM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> > > Please push your changes in the git repository for cl-asdf
> > > packaging,
&
stem.
* Tests: tests for new capabilities and bugs
* Documentation: a number of improvements and clarifications.
Thank you
Kambiz Darabi
--
m-creations gmbh
Acker 2
55116 Mainz
Germany
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-deve
> signed and uploaded!
Thank you!
>
>
> BTW the package has many uploaders, and some of them are DD.
>
> Usually it is better to ask them for uploads, instead of opening an RFS bug.
> In case they are MIA or not interested in cl-asdf anymore, better drop them
> from uploaders, and maybe open a M
Hi Faré,
On 2016-03-10 15:01 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2016-03-10 06:00 CET, Faré wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> now that a new ASDF release seems to be imminent, I would like to r
Hi
On 2016-03-10 06:00 CET, Faré wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> now that a new ASDF release seems to be imminent, I would like to repeat
>> my question from November 2015: can someone give me push access to the
:
- Peter Van Eynde
- Christoph Egger
- François-René Rideau
Thank you
Kambiz
Start of forwarded message
From: Kambiz Darabi
To: pkg-common-lisp-devel
Cc: Robert Goldman , Faré
Subject: cl-asdf debian package repo
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:28:52 +0100
Hi Mattia,
On 2015-12-28 18:56 CET, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
>> sorry for bothering you again but there are people who are interested in
>> a new debian package of ASDF 3.1.6
>
> You didn't file a RFS.
>
Kambiz
On 2015-12-06 20:55 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear Common Lisp team,
> dear mentors,
>
> as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
> uploading the new version:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
>
> Should I change somet
Dear Common Lisp team,
dear mentors,
as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
uploading the new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
Should I change something?
Thank you
Kambiz
On 2015-11-23 21:43 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear mentor
Dear Common Lisp team,
dear mentors,
as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
uploading the new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
Should I change something?
Thank you
Kambiz
On 2015-11-23 21:43 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear mentor
/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_3.1.6-1.dsc
Thank you
Kambiz Darabi
--
m-creations gmbh
Acker 2
55116 Mainz
Germany
W: http://www.m-creations.com
E: darabi@m-creations.[com|net]
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel
the debian dir into its own repo again and the
most natural place for it would be to go back to [1].
What would be needed to give me the necessary permissions to use that
repo?
Thank you
Kambiz Darabi
[1] git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-common-lisp/cl-asdf.git
[2] https://gitlab.common-lisp.net
Hi,
On 2014-05-25 17:51 CEST, Faré wrote:
> I already replied to this same message in another thread:
>
> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:06:07 +0200
> Message-ID:
>
> Subject: Re: RFS: Please upload cl-asdf package
> From: =?UTF-8?B?RmFyw6k=?=
> To: Kambiz Darabi ,
&
ow master:debian/changelog >
> debian/changelog ; edit debian/changelog
I have never packaged for Debian, but I use it since rex (1996). With a
bit of hand-holding, I might be able to do the packaging work.
Where can I fetch your changes?
Kambiz Darabi
__
p
code.
> [..] then I say that the sane overriding rule would be to state that
> any quicklisp-managed system always takes precedence over traditional
> dpkg-managed ones.
+1
Thank you
Kambiz Darabi
Paulo Sequeira wrote:
>
> Sebastian,
>
> I looked at your swiQlisp tool
Hello Sebastian,
Sebastian Tennant wrote:
>
> Hi Debian Lispers,
>
> As you are probably aware, Common Lisp library management got a whole lot
> easier with the introduction of Quicklisp last year.
>
> How about a Debian 'quicklisp' package which:
>
> 1. installs a Lisp if neccessary (or if req
packages? Are there tools
which help? How does one test the compatibility of the different
packages?
And (most important) how much time should a candidate have, to be able
to fulfill his 'duties'?
I know that much of the answers cannot be exact, but I just would like
to have an idea
think someone might be interested in such packages (currently
for i386 only)?
Do you think a sbcl-snapshot/slime-snapshot combo would be useful to
others?
If yes, how often could a new package be released (practically)
according to the Debian release and QM policies and processes?
Thank you
K
18 matches
Mail list logo
