Hello, Pico Lispers ["Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
> Hello "Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) > You are now subscribed > Hello, I think this mailing list is a very good idea. Will there be an archive of the postings? /Jon

Re: Hello, Pico Lispers ["Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] [Robert Wörle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
picolisp@software-lab.de schrieb: >> Hello "Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) >> You are now subscribed >> > > Hello, > > I think this mailing list is a very good idea. Will there be an archive of > the postings? Hehe, scream it louder ! Archive , Archive rob > > /Jon >

Re: Hello, Pico Lispers ["Jon K [Robert Wörle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Alex .. you should probably remove the the mail adresses in the subject so i say in the following line you could remove *Name and *From ? right ?!? (prinl "Subject: " (pack (or *Name *From) ": " *Subject) "^M") robert picolisp@software-lab.de schrieb: >

Re: Hello, Pico Lispers ["Jon K [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hi Robert, > Alex .. you should probably remove the the mail adresses in the subject > so i say in the following line you could remove *Name and *From ? right ?!? > >(prinl "Subject: " (pack (or *Name *From) ": " *Subject) "^M") I changed this yesterday to another format. Instead of "Na

Re: Hello, Pico Lispers [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
> I changed this yesterday to another format. Instead of > >"Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Original Subject > > I changed it to > >Original Subject ["Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Now I changed it once more. As the chain of ["Name1" ] ["Name2" ] ... was getting longer and longer in the

Re: Hello, Pico Lispers ["Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hi Jon, nice to see you here! :-) > I think this mailing list is a very good idea. Will there be an archive of > the postings? As you see, this is also the desire of Robert ;-) Initially, I was planning to maintain an archive for this list. However, I decided not to do so. This would be a much

Re: Hello, Pico Lispers [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
> If not, perhaps there is some other means than rolling one's own > archive? Pipe the whole stuff to master Google? Perhaps something like: http://www.mail-archive.com ? Cheers, - Alex

Pico, fixed-point floor and ceil [Jon Kleiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hi, Yesterday I sent Alex a couple of fixed-point functions, 'floor' and 'ceil', asking if he had any comments. He made me aware that I hadn't thought of negative input values. Here are my improved versions: (de floor (X) (let R (% X 1.0) (if (lt0 R) (- X R 1.0) (- X R

Re: Pico, fixed-point floor and ceil [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hi Jon, > (de floor (X) > (let R (% X 1.0) > (if (lt0 R) (- X R 1.0) (- X R)) ) ) > > (de ceil (X) > (let R (% X 1.0) > (if (gt0 R) (+ (- X R) 1.0) (- X R)) ) ) Looks nice! I don't think there is a substantially better way. Anybody else ? Cheers, - Alex

Subscribe [Anthony Sherbondy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hello Anthony Sherbondy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) You are now subscribed

Subscribe [Uwe Gruentjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hello Uwe Gruentjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) You are now subscribed

Re: Subscribe [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:05:32PM +0100, picolisp@software-lab.de wrote: > Hello Uwe Gruentjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) > You are now subscribed Hi Uwe! Welcome on board :-) Cheers, - Alex

Unsubscribe [Josef Bartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
Good bye Josef Bartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-( You are now unsubscribed

Subscribe [Josef Bartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
Hello Josef Bartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) You are now subscribed Da bin ich wieder.

subscribe ["Daniel Rooth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
Hello "Daniel Rooth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) You are now subscribed

Re: subscribe [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:42:36PM +0100, picolisp@software-lab.de wrote: > Hello "Daniel Rooth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) Hi Daniel! I'm happy to welcome you here :-) Cheers, - Alex

Archive [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
also register mail-archive at that time. Until then, we should test the system, and possibly improve it. The source code for the list server is included in the picoLisp release from now on, and I'll also attach the latest version to this mail (in case anybody cares). Cheers, - Alex #!bin/pico

Question from m_mans to Alex [Randall Dow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
one hour. [11:13] but, try: what is the question? [11:13] Randix: ok, thanks [11:21] I want to display all objects of +Order class in a table, so what prefix classes can I use with +Chart? I have no experience in prolog :( [11:21] ok, sorry, yes save that for Alex. I haven't played with th

Subscribe [Mansur Mamkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
Hello Mansur Mamkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) You are now subscribed

Re: Subscribe [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-13 Thread picolisp
Hi Mansur, as Randall already posted your question in IRC (display all objects of +Order class in a table, possibly without using pilog) (class +Order +Entity) (rel num (+Need +Key +Number)) #íîìåð çàêàçà (rel cdate(+Ref +Date)) #Äàòà (rel cti

From: ... [Uwe Gruentjes ]

2008-03-14 Thread picolisp
Hi, as Alex talked about improvements: I want to propose that the list mail "From:" is set to the real mail author and additionally a "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" is used to ensure responses to the correct address. That would make mail handling with modern mail clients (maybe except mutt, ) a l

Re: From: ... [Alexander Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-14 Thread picolisp
Hi Uwe, > I want to propose that the list mail "From:" is set to the real mail > author and additionally a "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" is used > to ensure responses to the correct address. > > That would make mail handling with modern mail clients (maybe except > mutt, ) a lot more covenient.

Mailing list header format [Randall Dow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-14 Thread picolisp
Hi Alex, I am not sure exactly what the technical implementation is, but Uwe is right, that is the normal way mailing-lists are done, e.g.: From: Randall Dow Sender: picolisp@software-lab.de Reply-to: picolisp@software-lab.de To: picolisp@software-lab.de Then you don't have to mung

subscribe ["Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]

2008-03-11 Thread picolisp
Hello "Jon Kleiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-) You are now subscribed

Subscribe

2021-04-11 Thread picolisp
Hello picol...@dnmx.org :-) You are now subscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

pil21: Why do waitFd and gPoll use 292MY for timeout?

2021-04-11 Thread picolisp
I am trying to fix infinite select errors about 292MY. src/lib.c: int32_t gPoll(struct pollfd *fds, int32_t nfds, int64_t timeout) { if (timeout == 9223372036854775807) { // 292MY int i = nfds; do if (--i < 0) return 0; while (

Re: Why do waitFd and gPoll use 292MY for timeout?

2021-04-15 Thread picolisp
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> That's too bad! If poll(2) uses only 32 bits for the timeout, the maximum is >> 49 >> days (as opposed to the 292 million years (292MY) in 64 bits). > > Not even that! For signed 32 bits it is only 24 days :( > > Should I chang

Re: Why do waitFd and gPoll use 292MY for timeout?

2021-04-16 Thread picolisp
$ picolisp -wait [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807

Unsubscribe

2021-04-17 Thread picolisp
Good bye picol...@dnmx.org :-( You are now unsubscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Another Test

2023-04-07 Thread picolisp
Sorry for the noise! ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Another Test

2023-04-07 Thread picolisp
Test > On Apr 7, 2023, at 13:28, picolisp@software-lab.de wrote: > > Sorry for the noise! > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Test Mail

2023-04-07 Thread picolisp
Test2 > On Apr 7, 2023, at 08:35, Mike wrote: > >  > Test reply. > >> On Apr 7, 2023, at 08:20, Alexander Burger wrote: >> >> This is a test. Please ignore! >> >> ☺/ A!ex >> >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@softwa

Unsubscribe

2023-04-15 Thread picolisp
Good bye r...@tamos.net :-( You are now unsubscribed Just changing (swapping) email addys. -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

2023-04-15 Thread picolisp

monocypher library

2023-07-22 Thread picolisp
hi all, Here you could find various bindings against monocypher crypto library: https://git.envs.net/mpech/monocypher-pil I will add more functions asap. (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

LLVM17

2023-09-20 Thread picolisp
hi all, LLVM17 released and PicoLisp successfully compiled out of the box and passed all tests on it. Happy coding. p.s. LLVM18-nightly works too so far. (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Subscribe

2023-10-25 Thread picolisp
Hello rom...@hotely.be :-) You are now subscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

docker for pil21

2024-01-24 Thread picolisp
hi all, I have created a docker file for pil21 you can play with. Comments are welcome. https://git.envs.net/mpech/pil21-docker (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Printed representation of (char 0) ?

2024-02-13 Thread picolisp
Hi Thorsten, I agree with the others, that's not a string you are processing. Strictly speaking, PicoLisp text functions and PicoLisp strings (and symbol names) must not contain NULL character. How about processing this fixed-size values in binary, using (rd 'cnt) and (wr 'cnt

1brc

2024-03-09 Thread picolisp
hi all, https://www.morling.dev/blog/one-billion-row-challenge/ I would like to share picolisp single process version: https://git.envs.net/mpech/tankf33der/raw/branch/master/1brc/demo.l Speed is ok 1 million row simple file on 40k cities = 1 sec, it is easy to calculate how fast it would

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

2024-03-13 Thread picolisp
really documented all > that well, but now I finally managed to properly release it: > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=morphles.CarrotKeys It can be > considered similar to Pente. Hope this can be of use for PicoLisp use "on the > go" :)

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

2024-03-13 Thread picolisp
t from Proton Mail mobile >> >> Original Message >> On Mar 13, 2024, 15:02, Edgaras Šeputis < picolisp@software-lab.de> wrote: >> >>> Some quite long time ago I showed my special on screen keyboard here, there >>> was some minor in

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

2024-03-13 Thread picolisp
;> I have ideas how to make it work, if you are interested. >> >> Original Message >> On Mar 13, 2024, 15:58, Edgaras Šeputis < picolisp@software-lab.de> wrote: >> >>> No, I'm thinking of premium version in future if there is any interest in >

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

2024-03-14 Thread picolisp
I like carrot. I am looking forward for more polished version. I will gladly pay. Carrot has smoother learning curve than penti. Carrot takes less brain space. I can operate carrot with one hand. Carrot have less throughput than penti, which can be fixed with personal llm auto complete. I miss ar

Re: Stream from call

2024-04-25 Thread picolisp
especially the first form (pipe exe) -> fd which returns a file descriptor. Bind it to a variable like (setq OtherProcess (pipe ...)) and then you can use it it in subsequent calls like (in OtherProcess ..) and (out OtherProcess ...). Be aware that the PicoLisp text stream functions (from)

Re: Stream from call

2024-04-25 Thread picolisp
ent calls like (in OtherProcess ...) and (out OtherProcess ...). Be aware that the PicoLisp text stream functions (from) (till) (line) (char) etc. always read one additional character, which is placed in a look-ahead buffer, which can be retrieved with (peek) - depending on how the called executable handl

Subscribe

2024-05-27 Thread picolisp
Hello mgr...@cruzio.com :-) You are now subscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Subscribe

2024-05-27 Thread picolisp
Hello mgr...@cruzio.com :-) You are now subscribed subscribe mgr...@cruzio.com "Mark Ryan" -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

2024-10-22 Thread picolisp
Good bye mgr...@cruzio.com :-( You are now unsubscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Tail call optimization

2025-02-08 Thread picolisp
On 08-02-2025 20:41, Lindsay Lawrence wrote: On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 10:16 AM Alexander Burger wrote: PicoLisp now has a kind of tail call optimization! https://software-lab.de/doc/refT.html#tco Hi Alex, I just downloaded the rolling release, why you do not use git for distribution

Re: Yet Another JSON Parser

2025-01-31 Thread picolisp
On 31-01-2025 20:32, Lindsay Lawrence wrote: I added another page to the Examples section of the wiki. https://picolisp.com/wiki/?Documentation#yajson Aside from the code, I included several examples of use, along with 'bench' times and a somewhat detailed description. All examples can be ru

Re: Directory and file functions?

2025-01-05 Thread picolisp
Lloyd R. prentice wrote: Hello, I’m considering PicoLisp for a web app I have in mind. The app would run on Linux and depend heavily on directory/file navigation. But so far, rummaging through the docs, I fail to find basic directory/file navigation functions such as provided by, say, Bash. C

Re: Tail call optimization

2025-02-08 Thread picolisp
On 09-02-2025 04:23, Lindsay Lawrence wrote: On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 10:16 AM Alexander Burger wrote: PicoLisp now has a kind of tail call optimization! I gave 'tco' a try. I appreciate the syntax. The similarity with existing recur syntax makes it trivial to convert code

Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-09 Thread picolisp
Hi Alexander. Thanks for the examples. I will study them later and compare with my usage in my code. > > Your example > >> : (car Cells-References) >> -> (gnm:Cell ((Row . "0") (Col . "0") (ValueType . "60")) "Ticker") > > cannot be a proper XML result, because we have never a list like > (gn

Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-10 Thread picolisp
Le 10/05/2025 à 07:48, Alexander Burger a écrit : > > It is just that (car Cells-References) came unexpected to me, because if > 'Cells-References' holds an XML structure, then its CAR cannot be a > list. It is always ( . ). > Ah! Yes, I should have specified that it had already been converted…

Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-10 Thread picolisp
Le 10/05/2025 à 09:35, Alexander Burger a écrit : > On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> There is (was?) also xml.l iirc which I wrote because the original XML >> parser did not support enough of XML for my use-case. You could also >> compare to that. > > Yes, right!

Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-09 Thread picolisp
Hello. On 25.4.17, you simplified 'body' and 'attr' in lib/xm.l. The changes are not compatible with the xml files from gnumeric : # Cells-References is the list of all cells from the tab 'Références' : (car Cells-References) -> (gnm:Cell ((Row . "0") (Col . "0") (ValueType . "60")) "Ticker") #

Subscribe

2025-07-09 Thread picolisp
-- Secured with Tuta Mail: https://tuta.com/free-email

Subscribe

2025-07-09 Thread picolisp
-- Secured with Tuta Mail: https://tuta.com/free-email

Re: Fridays for Functions

2025-07-14 Thread picolisp
from UTC 09:00 to 17:00, I will run a Jitsi Meet session > at: > > https://meeting.itship.ch/picolisp (thanks Andreas!) > > I call it Fridays for Functions :) > > > The session will be open all day. Anybody can join at any time during > that window. > >

Subscribe

2011-07-12 Thread glpg-picolisp
Hello glpg-picol...@m.gmane.org :-) You are now subscribed Subscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

2012-01-22 Thread cle-picolisp
enrik. At least me, if I do not like something, or I am feeling it is dead, I will unsubscribe. The lack of libraries may be a problem from time to time, but PicoLisp has also to offer a lot, like its DB with Pilog, its Web-Framework, its simplicity. Often people need a language that all