Hello Henrique,
> Recently, I tried to build PicoLisp from source (master branch at github).
> I've followed the instructions at INSTALL, but GNU Make complains that it
> can't find "../bin/picolisp" (from "src" directory). Am I supposed to
> download an executable and insert it there in order to
Hi Mike, All,
Thanks for these tips. I was not aware of: pil @lib/test.l +
to check the installation.
Here, I'm using Manjaro Linux and Picolisp can be installed from the Aur
repo with:
yay -S picolisp
however it installs version (18-9-1) which is not up to date!
Install from source works
On NixOS, picolisp has been available out of the box on 32 and 64 bit
intel and arm:
$ nix-shell -p picolisp
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Thank you for that detailed guideline, very helpful to
understand more.
For now I am using PiCoLisp on Debian Unstable via WSL 1
(Windows 10), but I will need to use it on an illumos (omniOS)
server sooner or later.
Is this list a good place to ask for question about the very
nice code repository
Hi Mike,
I like that, looks straight forward.
(after following it for the ubuntu track, one little suggestion: '*
ready to compile pil64' fits perfectly into the ascii view of the .md
file, but in the html view I overlooked it several times because it's
much less attracting attention)
I've neve
Hi Christopher, Andreas,
> > I could install all my supporting files in @lib/ in the picolisp
> > installation directory.
> That is one way to do it. Alex usually does it this way afaik.
I would not store application-specific stuff under @lib/, but it is true that on
production servers I usually
Hi Christopher
> I could install all my supporting files in @lib/ in the picolisp installation
> directory.
That is one way to do it. Alex usually does it this way afaik.
You could also create your own custom directory within the picolisp directory
and then refer to it with "@myDirectory/my-lib
On 2015-02-17T17:12:54+1100, Alexander Burger said:
AB> as I mentioned in my previous mail, is Thorsten currently AB>
offline. He asked me to post this for him
A> "i'll try to find some time to:
A> * examine the diffs between the distribution version and the
A> GitHub version;
T
To complicate things I've attached my two local versions of picolisp.el and
inferior-picolisp.el
When I diff them I see quite substantial differences.
Unfortunately I have no idea why I made those changes as I didn't take any
notes and it was several years ago.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:12 AM,
Hi list,
as I mentioned in my previous mail, is Thorsten currently offline.
He asked me to post this for him:
-
Hi Alexis,
this is Thorsten, the current maintainer (but ot original author) of
the Emacs stuff.
"i'll try to find some time to:
* examine
On 2015-02-15T02:56:38+1100, Alexander Burger said:
AB> Unfortunately, Thorsten (the original maintainer) is
currently AB> offline.
AB> I can't do anything in 'picolisp.el', as I'm ignorant of
emacs, AB> but I can gladly take changes (if they are
thoughtfully reviewed AB> and agreed upon by
Hi Alexis,
> >Hi Alexis, if I google "picolisp emacs" I see the following URL as
> >the #1 result: https://github.com/tj64/picolisp-mode
> >
> >That is what I use when I code PL in Emacs, works great!
>
> Excellent. :-) However, that code hasn't been updated for over 2
> years, and since i've had
On 2015-02-14T00:39:55+1100, Lawrence Bottorff said:
LB> Is this different from the distribution version?
Yes. The distribution version includes `picolisp-wiki-mode.el`,
which the GitHub version doesn't, and a running a diff on
`picolisp.el` and `inferior-picolisp.el` shows various
differenc
Henrik Sarvell writes:
Hi Alexis, if I google "picolisp emacs" I see the following URL
as the #1 result: https://github.com/tj64/picolisp-mode
That is what I use when I code PL in Emacs, works great!
Excellent. :-) However, that code hasn't been updated for over 2
years, and since i've had
Hi Lawrence, I have no idea, I have never installed the dist version.
I usually install like at the bottom of this article:
http://picolisp.com/wiki/?Websockets
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Lawrence Bottorff
wrote:
> Is this different from the distribution version? BTW, the dist version
> d
Is this different from the distribution version? BTW, the dist version
doesn't seem to have a customize - mode variable for the picolisp exe or
for pil. Again, the default seems to be /usr/bin/pil . How do I override
this?
Hi Alexis, if I google "picolisp emacs" I see the following URL as the #1
result: https://github.com/tj64/picolisp-mode
That is what I use when I code PL in Emacs, works great! I've added a few
keywords to the mode and the doc jumping in my init.el, could post both
changes here if anyone is intere
andr...@itship.ch writes:
@Alexis: Just have a look into lib/el/ in your picolisp
installation.
i'm on Debian Wheezy(+updates), and having installed the available
PicoLisp package (3.1.0.7-1), couldn't see any .el files within
the PicoLisp directory (/usr/share/picolisp/), which doesn't hav
The drop-down menu has tools to do indentation, commenting in and out, and to run-picolisp.When you have run-picolisp started (thats an emacs buffer with pil repl), there are several additional options in the dropdown to evaluate the picolisp code where the cursor is in the editor buffer, or to ru
Okay, now it's working! Thanks for all your efforts!
As far as the drop-down menu, I can't recall. But it was present with the
distribution package, in .../lib/el if I'm not mistaken. It's just that now
when I run M-x picolisp-mode . . . nothing seems to have happened. For
opening a *.l file, I ge
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
Okay, this is what I get with the latest melpa picolisp-mode:
emacs-snapshot: /usr/bin/pil: No such file or directory
Process picolisp-repl exited abnormally with code 127
This is /after/ you've set the value of `picoliso-pil-executable`
appropriately?
Alexis.
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
BTW, I don't see a drop-down menu when I start
picolisp-mode. The old version (bundled with the picolisp
download had one. Just thought I'd mention it. . . .
Well, what i've written isn't any sort of 'update' of the version
you mention; i wrote it from scratch, as
Okay, this is what I get with the latest melpa picolisp-mode:
emacs-snapshot: /usr/bin/pil: No such file or directory
Process picolisp-repl exited abnormally with code 127
>
>
BTW, I don't see a drop-down menu when I start picolisp-mode. The old
version (bundled with the picolisp download had one. Just thought I'd
mention it. . . .
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Lawrence Bottorff
wrote:
> Forward-step (Fortschritt) must be, so said Wallenski.
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 201
Forward-step (Fortschritt) must be, so said Wallenski.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Alexis wrote:
>
> Alexis writes:
>
> Lawrence Bottorff writes:
>>
>
> . . I'm sure if I install a ubuntu-debian package version of picolisp
>>> (3.1.7) picolisp-repl will see that, i.e., it's hardwired s
Alexis writes:
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
. . I'm sure if I install a ubuntu-debian package version of
picolisp
(3.1.7) picolisp-repl will see that, i.e., it's hardwired
somewhere to look for a /usr/bin/ executable (pil or picolisp).
Not quite: the problem turns out to be that i've fa
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
. . I'm sure if I install a ubuntu-debian package version of
picolisp
(3.1.7) picolisp-repl will see that, i.e., it's hardwired
somewhere to look for a /usr/bin/ executable (pil or picolisp).
Not quite: the problem turns out to be that i've failed to make
use of
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
No matter what I do, M-x picolisp-repl gives:
Searching for program: no such file or directory, pil
I've set customize group thus: ..
'(picolisp-picolisp-executable
"/home/lawrence/opt/picoLisp/bin/picolisp")
'(picolisp-pil-executable "/home/lawrence/opt/picoLis
. . I'm sure if I install a ubuntu-debian package version of picolisp
(3.1.7) picolisp-repl will see that, i.e., it's hardwired somewhere to look
for a /usr/bin/ executable (pil or picolisp).
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Lawrence Bottorff
wrote:
> No matter what I do, M-x picolisp-repl giv
No matter what I do, M-x picolisp-repl gives:
Searching for program: no such file or directory, pil
I've set customize group thus:
..
'(picolisp-picolisp-executable "/home/lawrence/opt/picoLisp/bin/picolisp")
'(picolisp-pil-executable "/home/lawrence/opt/picoLisp/pil")
in a fresh install of th
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
New install. Put picoLisp in ~/opt/picoLisp/ Then I created an
alias for the pil:
alias pil='~/opt/picoLisp/pil +'
This works fine from shell; starts up REPL. However emacs can't
start the REPL (run-picolisp):
Searching for program: no such file or directory, pil
Hi Lawrence,
> alias pil='~/opt/picoLisp/pil +'
>
> This works fine from shell; starts up REPL However emacs can't
> start the REPL (run-picolisp):
>
> Searching for program: no such file or directory, pil
>
> What can I do to make emacs see ~/opt/picoLisp/pil ?
have you tried
alias pil=~/op
n/picolisp ${0%/*}/lib.l @ext.l
> @lib/misc.l @lib/btree.l @lib/db.l @lib/pilog.l "$@"
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: picolisp@software-lab.de [mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de] On
> Behalf
> > Of Alexander Burger
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07,
l
#!/bin/sh
BROWSER=x-www-browser exec ${0%/*}/bin/picolisp ${0%/*}/lib.l @ext.l
@lib/misc.l @lib/btree.l @lib/db.l @lib/pilog.l "$@"
> -Original Message-
> From: picolisp@software-lab.de [mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de] On Behalf
> Of Alexander Burger
> Sent: Satu
Hi Lawrence,
> I've gotten the latest picolisp, 3.1.9, and am trying to install locally.
OK
> Following the instructions for 64-bit on my linux, I've built the
> executable picolisp all right. But the bin directory's pil seems to pick up
> the previous version I installed before from Ubuntu:
I
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:42:43PM -0500, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> Why does the pil in .../bin/ behave this way? I'd like both, but I guess I
> could uninstall one of them. . .
No, keeping both is fine. I do the same.
You can have as many installations on the system as you like. You simply
sele
Alex,
I think the problem is more with the fact that I am using a Mac and
Xcode (not necessarily typical of Unix development tools) rather than
Pico Lisp itself. This is compounded by my being stuck in the past
so to speak with a Power PC chip and OS X 10.4. No worries, when I
have the
Hello Kyle,
> So there are some things I must adjust; but I decided in the meantime to
> take Jon Kleiser's advice and install an earlier version -
> picoLisp-2.3.0. Success!!! Now I get to investigate pico Lisp while I
> work on the above.
This is strange. I'd be very much interested why p
Hello all,
I wanted to give an update and let everyone know I have had some
success:
Alex was correct I did not have gcc loaded. Originally I had Xcode
on this machine and forgot I had done an OS X reinstall. (I am
embarrassed about that. My background is embedded programming with a
Hi Boh Yap,
> mac. The 1st thing to do is to have the Developer CD that came with
> the Mac installed. All the compilers and build tools are in there. In
> ...
Thanks for the info!
> have tried the 64bit picolisp, but won't compile on my 10.5.7.
Yep, this does not work yet. The problem is to f
hi all,
I have compile picolisp 2.3.x (at least 2.3.3 or later..) on a PPC
mac. The 1st thing to do is to have the Developer CD that came with
the Mac installed. All the compilers and build tools are in there. In
your case, it can't find gcc, so that might be the problem. If you
bought yr Mac earl
Hello Alex,
I appreciate the help. Yes, I think I am going to need to do some
tweaking. I am about to leave on a two day trip, but I am anxious to
get back and start in on it. The good news is it looks like there
have been a lot of responses. Thank you everyone.
Best regards,
Kyle
O
Kyle,
The GCC compiler is contained in a package called "xcode".
Cheers,
- Rand
=
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
Hi Randall,
> in. I don't think that picolisp will run on the PowerPC without some =
> work and I think no one has tried it
I think it used to run without problems, when Rick Hanson sent me the
'make' parameters back in 2006.
Only the 64-bit version (in assembly) will not run, as an explici
Hi,
The latest Pico Lisp I have built on my PowerPC Mac (w/10.4.11), seems to
be picoLisp-2.3.0.
/Jon
> Hello,
>
> I am having a bit of a problem installing picolisp on a PowerPC Mac
> running OS X 10.411. Here is the command line output after running
> the make command.
>
> PowerBook-12in:~/pi
Hi All,
I sent a detailed message this morning to the list, but apparently from an =
email address that I was not subscribed and the list server tossed it (corr=
ect so). I'll resend it tonight when I have access to my computer aga=
in. I don't think that picolisp will run on the PowerPC withou
PowerPc, is that the old Motorola CPU architecture? If so then no, the
one I copied to was definitely an Intel machine.
>>Ubuntu current version<<
Do you mean 9.04 by that?
/Henrik
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:43:31AM +0200, Henrik Sarv
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:43:31AM +0200, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
> executable that I had compiled in Ubuntu Feisty (observe no later
> versions of Ubuntu will work as the GCC is broken on them) to a Mac
I didn't watch the gcc-situation for a while, but I compiled PicoLisp
repeatedly on current vers
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:43:31AM +0200, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
> ... just simply copied the picolisp executable that I had compiled in
> Ubuntu Feisty ... to a Mac and it simply ran it without any problems.
But Kyle has a PowerPC Mac. Does it emulate x86 instructions?
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:pico
For what it's worth I think I once just simply copied the picolisp
executable that I had compiled in Ubuntu Feisty (observe no later
versions of Ubuntu will work as the GCC is broken on them) to a Mac
and it simply ran it without any problems.
/Henrik
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alexander
Hi Kyle,
welcome to the mailing list!
> I am having a bit of a problem installing picolisp on a PowerPC Mac
> running OS X 10.411. Here is the command line output after running the
> make command.
I'm afraid I'm not of much help, as I don't have a Mac myself. I was
hoping that some of the Ma
51 matches
Mail list logo
