xplodes though
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hillebrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2002 00:34
To: 'Egil Helland'; 'brother'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] checking for characters
I like Egil's idea of readable code using e
> Don't forget about the new .name, and I thought I might mention that
> preg()/PCREs would be the way to go if you're trying to make your code
> readable.
That's why we have the remark statement (e.g. to make unclear code more readable).
It is always a good habit to frequently comment your code
what's wrong with ereg and care to give perl related code?...
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hillebrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2002 01:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Egil Helland'; 'brother'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] checking for
ing like that. I'd personally use a couple of explodes though
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hillebrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2002 00:34
To: 'Egil Helland'; 'brother'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] checking for characters
;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] checking for characters
This was posted to the same group ages ago:
if(ereg(
"^[^@ ]+@([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.)+([a-zA-Z0-9\-]{2}|net|com|gov|mil|org|edu|int)$"
,$email))
{
//email address is valid
}
else
{
// it ain't
}
Or something like
Original Message-
From: Matt Hillebrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2002 00:34
To: 'Egil Helland'; 'brother'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] checking for characters
I like Egil's idea of readable code using explode and regular
express
I like Egil's idea of readable code using explode and regular
expressions. Or, you could use this function I wrote:
function isValidEmail($email) {
if(strlen($email) < 6)
return false;
$at = -1; // index of '@'
for($i=0; $i$at && $imailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Brush up on your patt
Brush up on your patternmatching then, brother. Check the php.net manual
on regexp.
If you want more readable code, try splitting the string (explode) on @
first, then split the segment after @ that you now have on . again.
Cheers,
Egil (in Norway, so I am way past bedtime myself :))
On Wed
