Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Sun, 05 Jan 2014 17:25:31 +0100):
>OK, got a ZwTerminateProcess.dmp by tracking the php-cgi.exe PID on
>memory leaks and the like. No debug symbols yet, so I will run another
>analysis.
I cannot get DebugDiag to find the correct symbols. And I do not know
how to do the
--
Wendell P
wende...@operamail.com
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013, at 08:12 PM, Good Guy wrote:
> >>> ... phpinfo() indicates that
> >>> the intl and mbstring extensions are not loaded
> >> Have you enabled mbstring in your php.ini file?
> > Yes, I did all that and intl & mbstring are working fine.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013, at 01:59 PM, Good Guy wrote:
> On 14/12/2013 21:37, Wendell P wrote:
> > ... phpinfo() indicates that
> > the intl and mbstring extensions are not loaded. Also, "php -i" says
> > they are not loaded but "php -m" says that they are. I tested functions
> > from both extensions a
Le Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:01:55 +0200, Pierre Joye a écrit :
> In the long run yes, or maybe. Right now the last release is totally
> unusable. For various reasons, some fixable and other will be hardly
> fixable without changes in the engine
>
> ... Also windows as a whole is not a priority for Zen
I have no idea...maybe? I'll reference that issue in mine.
Keith Davis (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:36 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-WIN] Re: Zend OPCache - Error - Unable to create view
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>
> Right now the last release is totally unusable. For various
> reasons, some fixable and other will be hardly fixable without
> changes in the engine[.]
Uh, this is news to me. We did our full release testing with WinCache + Zend
Opcache enabl
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:01:55 +0200):
>In the long run yes, or maybe. Right now the last release is totally
>unusable. For various reasons, some fixable and other will be hardly
>fixable without changes in the engine.
I know there are some issues:
https://github.com/zendtec
m]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:02 AM
To: Eric Stenson
Cc: php-windows; Tomasz Krawczyk
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: WinCache 1.3.5 release on SourceForge
On Aug 22, 2013 8:07 PM, "Eric Stenson" wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Krawczyk [mailto:tomkr...
On Aug 22, 2013 8:07 PM, "Eric Stenson" wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Krawczyk [mailto:tomkr...@gmail.com]
> >
> > You wrote Zend Opcache has to be enabled in PHP 5.5 so,
> > it is an extension, not part of the PHP core, but it
> > is bundled with PHP 5.5.
> [...]
> >
> > Ar
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Krawczyk [mailto:tomkr...@gmail.com]
>
> You wrote Zend Opcache has to be enabled in PHP 5.5 so,
> it is an extension, not part of the PHP core, but it
> is bundled with PHP 5.5.
[...]
>
> Are you sure you will have to remove opcode cache
> from WinCache i
W dniu 2013-08-21 17:11, Eric Stenson pisze:
-Original Message-
--E.
Eric,
thanks for an answer.
You wrote Zend Opcache has to be enabled in PHP 5.5 so, it is an
extension, not part of the PHP core, but it is bundled with PHP 5.5.
I have no experience with Zend Opcache. About
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Krawczyk [mailto:tomkr...@gmail.com]
>
> Can you tell when sources will be available on the
> http://pecl.php.net/package/wincache?
Yeah, as soon as I remember how to do this, I'll take care of it. ^_^
>
> Another question. Are you planing to make x64 ve
Eric Stenson in php.windows (Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:35:25 +):
>I've filed bug https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65338 to track this
>issue. The root cause of the AV is when more than one module hooks the
>interned strings, a "wrong" value will be left in
>CG(interned_strings_start), which the Zend
Keith Davis in php.windows (Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:57:05 -0500):
>But I thought from the previous fix, what was updated was php5.dll. So,
>to be clear, I want to use a base (revert my php5.dll file to base)
>5.5.1 build with the new php_wincache.dll and php_opcache.dll files?
Yes. Dmitry took another
For clarity, I'm testing the whole 5.5.2-dev build. Seems to work fine.
Keith Davis (214) 906-5183
From: Keith Davis [mailto:keithda...@pridedallas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 3:57 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
But I thought from the pre
...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:25 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:15:50 +0200):
>Keith Davis in php.windows (Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:24:26 -0500):
>>Ok, I copied both php
Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:15:50 +0200):
>Keith Davis in php.windows (Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:24:26 -0500):
>>Ok, I copied both php5.dll and php_wincache.dll from the ones you
>>compiled, Jan, with Eric's patch and it works!
>
>New compilation without Eric's patch, but with Dmitry
Keith Davis in php.windows (Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:24:26 -0500):
>Ok, I copied both php5.dll and php_wincache.dll from the ones you
>compiled, Jan, with Eric's patch and it works!
New compilation without Eric's patch, but with Dmitry's patch of today:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8954372/php-5
Eric Stenson in php.windows (Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:35:25 +):
>I've filed bug https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65338 to track this
>issue. The root cause of the AV is when more than one module hooks the
>interned strings, a "wrong" value will be left in
>CG(interned_strings_start), which the Zend
Ok, I copied both php5.dll and php_wincache.dll from the ones you compiled,
Jan, with Eric's patch and it works!
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8954372/php-5.5.1-nts-Win32-VC11-x86.zip
Updated both bug reports confirming this as well.
This message (including any attachments) may contain
Keith Davis in php.windows (Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:52:53 -0500):
>Jan, this version does not work (crashed.)
Crashed at startup or on closing? What is the date of php_wincache.dll?
Should be something like 2013-07-26 17:49. Filesize: 131584.
Maybe dropbox did not synchronize yet...
>I'm showing Fil
Jan, this version does not work (crashed.) I'm showing File Version of 1.3.5.0.
Keith Davis - (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:25 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Cras
Eric Stenson in php.windows (Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:35:25 +):
>I've filed bug https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65338 to track this
>issue. The root cause of the AV is when more than one module hooks the
>interned strings, a "wrong" value will be left in
>CG(interned_strings_start), which the Zend
Keith--
I haven't figured out how to resolve bugs as duplicate on the bugs.php.net site.
Thx!
--E.
From: Keith Davis [mailto:keithda...@pridedallas.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:04 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Thanks Eric.
Thanks Eric.
I had already created a bug report this issue here:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65247&thanks=3
Yours is obviously a better report of the issue, and so I've referenced yours
in mine. Is there a way for bugs to marked duplicate in this bug report system?
Keith Davis - (214) 906-
: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:24 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Tue, 23 Jul 2013 06:43:06 -0500):
>It's only with:
>wincache.enablecli=1 & opcache.enable_cli=1
OK. And those
Keith Davis in php.windows (Tue, 23 Jul 2013 06:43:06 -0500):
>It's only with:
>wincache.enablecli=1 & opcache.enable_cli=1
OK. And those two do not go along when php is running from th
ecommandline. They produce errors while closing the script.
There is a nasty workaround: leave PHP before the e
--Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 4:01 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:59 -0500):
>A, geez. It looks like it's caused by Wincache.
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:59 -0500):
>A, geez. It looks like it's caused by Wincache. I disable and
>enable that extension and the crashing stops and starts.
>
>However, again, I've tested Wincache thoroughly with Opcache in
>IIS and have no issues. It's only on the com
- (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:10 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:59 -0500):
>A, geez. It looks like it's c
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:59 -0500):
>A, geez. It looks like it's caused by Wincache. I disable and enable
>that extension and the crashing stops and starts.
>
>However, again, I've tested Wincache thoroughly with Opcache in IIS and
>have no issues. It's only on the com
p...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 11:04 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:36:32 -0500):
>"Maybe the developers of OPcache can do something with this
>information, although it is deep insid
) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 11:04 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:36:32 -0500):
>"Maybe the developers of OPcache can
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:36:32 -0500):
>"Maybe the developers of OPcache can do something with this information,
>although it is deep inside Windows. Is it a Windows Server? Which
>edition? 2008 R2 or higher?"
>
>How do I contact them?
https://github.com/zendtech/ZendOptimiz
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:04:44 -0500):
>Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
>0x7756e696 in ntdll!KiRaiseUserExceptionDispatcher ()
> from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
Your bug report was talking about
C
ine (which is what we use in production), if
that would help.
Keith Davis - (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 8:45 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.wi
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:04:44 -0500):
>Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
>0x7756e696 in ntdll!KiRaiseUserExceptionDispatcher ()
> from C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
Your bug report was talking about
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\ntdll.dll
https://bugs.php.net/
Keith Davis in php.windows (Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:04:44 -0500):
>Seems to be the same problem with this method, no debugging symbols found.
>I've added the debug pack to my c:\PHP directory (with the extension
>.pdb files in \ext.)
I had the same problem. I am not sure if the GNU debugger looks at
Seems to be the same problem with this method, no debugging symbols found. I've
added the debug pack to my c:\PHP directory (with the extension .pdb files in
\ext.)
C:\temp>gdb32.exe php.exe
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.5.1
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 o
Good to know.
Keith Davis - (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 8:50 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-WIN] Re: CLI Crash Bug
Keith Davis in php.windows (Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:14:39 -0500):
>We are try
The problem with using the x64 version just for command line is we are running
PHPUnit and composer and we need the build to be the same as production - which
is running IIS.
We are planning on doing some straight command line stuff on a production box
as well, and this x64 info is good to know
hi!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Getting back on topic.
>
> Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:11:36 +0200):
>>Steffen from Apachelounge said something interesting:
>>"Opcache is creating in his temp dir "
>>http://www.apachelounge.com/vi
Hi Pierre,
Getting back on topic.
Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:11:36 +0200):
>Steffen from Apachelounge said something interesting:
>"Opcache is creating in his temp dir "
>http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=5461
I followed Steffen's idea to use FcgidInitialEnv t
hi,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:11:36 +0200):
>>Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:39:17 +0200):
>>>I do not understand why you build everything from scratch. Providing the
>>>missing ext should be enough. Al
Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:11:36 +0200):
>Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:39:17 +0200):
>>I do not understand why you build everything from scratch. Providing the
>>missing ext should be enough. Also we work with everyone to be sure that we
>>are all sync'ed fro
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:39:17 +0200):
>On Jul 9, 2013 7:54 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
>> For what purpose should I use two php.ini's?
>
>For having two different settings for x86 and x64. Which is what your patch
>does. You already have two different DLLs.
O, yes
On Jul 9, 2013 7:54 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:06:04 +0200):
> For what purpose should I use two php.ini's?
> For running two versions
> with their own OPcache? That is what this whole discussion is about (and
> can't be solved wit
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:06:04 +0200):
>On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>> Hopping back and forth between this list and github. I seem to have a
>> really ugly workaround now. I recompiled the x64 php_opcache.dll after
>> changing the semaphore
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:41:12 +0200):
>>I am having troubles configuring multiple PHP-versions, all running
>>under Apache 2.4.4 with their own OPcache. My feeling at the moment is
>>that under Windows you can only have
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Momchil Bozhinov wrote:
> Спасибо Анатолий
>
>
>
>
>
> Now, if you could tell me why my configure.js would not
> recognize this extension?
>
>
>
>
>
> I've been using this guide for quite some time with no
> problems so far
fix has been committed:
http://svn.php.
Спасибо Анатолий
Now, if you could tell me why my configure.js would not
recognize this extension?
I've been using this guide for quite some time with no
problems so far
https://wiki.php.net/internals/windows/stepbystepbuild
Поздрави,
Момчил
On Fri, 06/28/2013 01:20 PM, "
ay, April 13, 2013 3:56 AM
> To: php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] RE: WELCOME to php-windows@lists.php.net
>
> Hallo everybody, Thank you Edward for answer! Indeed, there is a big
> chance that the filter i am talking about in the Original message will
> rem
013 12:34:46 -0400
> Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] RE: WELCOME to php-windows@lists.php.net
>
Not regarding your question, just wanted to point out that your filter will
remove valid email addresses.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Egbert Husban [mailto:sh...@live.nl]
> > S
Not regarding your question, just wanted to point out that your filter will
remove valid email addresses.
> -Original Message-
> From: Egbert Husban [mailto:sh...@live.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:37 AM
> To: php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] RE:
From: sh...@live.nl
To: gavin.chalk...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] RE: WELCOME to php-windows@lists.php.net
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 15:31:28 +0200
Hai man,
I will aks some questions about an e-mail script. The core of this srcipt is to
check whether the e-mail-server of the client
U just did
On Apr 6, 2013 10:17 PM, "Egbert Husban" wrote:
> Hallo, When can i start to asking questions.
> Egbert.==
> > Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2
Please suggest and advise for a good sources.
On 13/12/2012 06:17 PM, Good Guy wrote:
learn HTML and CSS
--
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ok, gave it a basic test, running it off a flash drive, on a windows XP
machine, which is still using a relatively clean/simple installation of
windows XP, and really seemd to run/work fine/well enough, so definitely the
type of thing was looking for.
I suppose only issue would be that if you
Thanks.
Will check/try it out.
Main thing would be to allow some guys to make use of like an offline
version of some PHP apps/code, etc., so this might/should do the job if it
does what it sounds like it should.
Stay well
Jacob Kruger
Blind Biker
Skype: BlindZA
'...fate had broken his body,
Ferenc Kovacs in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 18:36:08 +0200):
>> ADD_EXTENSION_DEP('memcache', 'session');
>that was introduced in
>http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pecl/wincache/trunk/config.w32?r1=324182&r2=324181&pathrev=324182
OK. I can see you are quite more experienced with svn than I am ;-)
Jan
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:37 +0200):
> >why don't you ask the authors directly instead of using random binaries?
>
> It seems you are (maybe without knowing it) one of those authors. The
> 1.3.0RC1 of the PECL wincache
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:37 +0200):
>why don't you ask the authors directly instead of using random binaries?
It seems you are (maybe without knowing it) one of those authors. The
1.3.0RC1 of the PECL wincache sources contained the line:
ADD_EXTENSION_DEP('memcache', 'ses
It is no random binary. It is the wincache 1.3.0RC1 PECL release:
http://pecl.php.net/package/WinCache/1.3.0
I reported back to MS in this thread:
http://forums.iis.net/t/1187707.aspx
Jan
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:37 +0200):
>why don't you ask the authors directly instead
hi!
why don't you ask the authors directly instead of using random binaries?
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> "Keith Davis" in php.windows (Mon, 7 May 2012 18:39:09 -0500):
>>Wait. Did you compile 1.3.0? We were never told that this was compiled
>>and we're actively working
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Mon, 7 May 2012 18:39:09 -0500):
>Wait. Did you compile 1.3.0? We were never told that this was compiled
>and we're actively working with MS to get this done.
>
>http://forums.iis.net/t/1187707.aspx
As you can see at http://x32.elijst.nl/phpinfo.php5f I compiled the
W
6:20 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: Need php_imagick.dll for PHP 5.4
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Mon, 7 May 2012 11:09:35 -0500):
>I tried to compile Wincache under 5.4.0 and got all kinds of errors.
>I'm not very experienced at compiling PHP exten
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Mon, 7 May 2012 11:09:35 -0500):
>I tried to compile Wincache under 5.4.0 and got all kinds of errors. I'm
>not very experienced at compiling PHP extensions, I admit, but I did get
>it to compile under 5.3.x.
I used the 1.3.0 beta sources:
http://pecl.php.net/package/
: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: Need php_imagick.dll for PHP 5.4
"mod_fcgid"
We're on IIS and I don't know what that means. We are using NTS and
FastCGI.
Did you re-compile Wincache? If so, what base version did you use? If
not, what version of Wincache are
Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 5:49 AM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: Need php_imagick.dll for PHP 5.4
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Sat, 5 May 2012 09:41:39 -0500):
>Strange, this guy says he has it working (but apparently with
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Sat, 5 May 2012 09:41:39 -0500):
>Strange, this guy says he has it working (but apparently with some
>relative directory problem):
>
>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9954764/imagick-php-5-4-extension-does-not-work-with-relative-paths-windows
>
>We will need it to (w
Awesome!
Keith Davis (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Jan Ehrhardt [mailto:php...@ehrhardt.nl]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 3:45 PM
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: Need php_imagick.dll for PHP 5.4
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Sat, 5 May 201
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Sat, 5 May 2012 09:41:39 -0500):
>Strange, this guy says he has it working (but apparently with some
>relative directory problem):
>
>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9954764/imagick-php-5-4-extension-doe
>s-not-work-with-relative-paths-windows
>
>We will need it to
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Sat, 5 May 2012 09:41:39 -0500):
>Strange, this guy says he has it working (but apparently with some
>relative directory problem):
>
>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9954764/imagick-php-5-4-extension-does-not-work-with-relative-paths-windows
Apparently, he has got
Strange, this guy says he has it working (but apparently with some
relative directory problem):
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9954764/imagick-php-5-4-extension-doe
s-not-work-with-relative-paths-windows
We will need it to (we can't even move to 5.4 until Wincache is
updated.)
Keith Davis (2
I know, and do still want to look into mobile port of JQuery as well - could
then, I suppose, maybe use something like client sig to see if it was like a
mobile browser, and then implement a slightly different version.
Stay well
Jacob Kruger
Blind Biker
Skype: BlindZA
'...fate had broken his b
Will look into it, but, the bunch of DHTML it seems to be making use of
means I might not try too hard...
Thanks though.
stay well
Jacob Kruger
Blind Biker
Skype: BlindZA
'...fate had broken his body, but not his spirit...'
- Original Message -
From: "Bogdan Ribic"
To:
Sent: Monda
hi!
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone able to access the windows.php.net site?
>>
>> TIA,
>> Tommy
>
> NVM, something must of happened for a minute there...
Must have been a dns/external issue, no down
Hello
I think it can be for the same reason that phpldapadmin and phppgadmin does not
work.
Unfortunately I do not see in the httpd.conf file the line you mention
(PHPIniDir)
Thanks
MCQ
-Message d'origine-
De : Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 11 déce
>-Original Message-
>From: Rasmus [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com]
>Sent: 07 June 2011 13:53
>To: Lester Caine
>Cc: php-windows; PHP internals
>Subject: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP-DEV] Windows builds
>
>On 06/07/2011 09:36 AM, Lester Caine wro
On 06/07/2011 09:36 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>> Lester,
>>
>> We are now all aware of your constant bashing about our work for php
>> on windows, but could you please give us some rest and post this
>> wherever you like.
>>
>> And no you won't get a official ok for this build or
Pierre Joye wrote:
Lester,
We are now all aware of your constant bashing about our work for php
on windows, but could you please give us some rest and post this
wherever you like.
And no you won't get a official ok for this build or any other but
what we have already numerous times discuss. The
Hey Pierre, let me massage your ego a bit before I explain why I think the
security guys have a problem with this. First off, I appreciate the work you
do for the PHP community! I do recognize you as a leading member of the
community. Your opinion clearly has a lot of weight when it comes to PHP on
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Logan L wrote:
> It might be ok with the security guys if the builds were released as
> official builds from the ASF courtesy of the apachelounge.
>
> I agree for personal development use, apachelounge might be ok. I have used
> them for local development in the pas
It might be ok with the security guys if the builds were released as
official builds from the ASF courtesy of the apachelounge.
I agree for personal development use, apachelounge might be ok. I have used
them for local development in the past and was happy with them.
I think many companies will n
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Logan L wrote:
> From a security perspective, using the ApacheLounge binaries is not an
> option for us. It is too dependent on one person whom is not directly
> associated with the ASF.
Many other projects are moving to VC9 builds as well. For example
easyphp mo
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Logan L wrote:
> Using PHP via FastCGI is how you use PHP with IIS. I haven't seen it used
> much with Apache via this method. I wonder what the benefits and drawbacks
> are. Will have to google on this subject.
>
> Also I would like to 'ask the audience' on the d
Using PHP via FastCGI is how you use PHP with IIS. I haven't seen it used
much with Apache via this method. I wonder what the benefits and drawbacks
are. Will have to google on this subject.
Also I would like to 'ask the audience' on the difficulty of building your
own Apache binaries. It is not s
Hi,
I am in a big problem,
My manager gave a task,
He want a PHP scrip which will check if the remote machines are Powered on
and are running.
He want this to be done using eclipse.
He also want a log in a HTML or text file that which remote machine is
running and which remote machine is down/po
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Curtis Tammany wrote:
> Extensions in the php.ini file? It was using the ini file that came with
> PHP
> 5.3.6.
>
> Can anyone get PHP 5.3.6 (from windows.php.net/download) to work with
> Apache??? The PHP site says it will only work with the VC9 version found at
>
Extensions in the php.ini file? It was using the ini file that came with PHP
5.3.6.
Can anyone get PHP 5.3.6 (from windows.php.net/download) to work with
Apache??? The PHP site says it will only work with the VC9 version found at
apachelounge.com...
"Toby Hart Dyke" wrote in message
news:4d
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case,
> any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is
> FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS?
It is faster, however the ISAPI was not maintained and has issues. Bu
Try third binary instead of official one.
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
2011/3/26 Tommy Pham :
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>>
>>> There used to be a VC6 binary release fo
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
>> There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at
>> windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way,
>> since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> There used to be a VC6 binary release for PHP v5.3.3 at
> windows.php.net but I don't see a VC6 build for v5.3 now. Any way,
> since you're using using Windows, why not just run it as FastCGI? It
> runs fine on Win2003 (x86), Win7 x64, Win08
On 3/25/2011 3:15 PM, somebody wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Curtis Tammany wrote:
Help!! I am in a Windows environment (XP SP3 for development and Server 2003
for production. I have to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6. It does not appear to
On 1 March 2011 10:59, nagendra prasad wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have attached the table structure and the PHP code.
>
> Best,
> Guru.
>
> --
> PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
The scloth100 columns I can see are ...
|scloth100_t
On 1 March 2011 10:59, nagendra prasad wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have attached the table structure and the PHP code.
>
> Best,
> Guru.
>
> --
> PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
Thank you for that.
Can you tell me what column in t
Am 17.01.2011 03:24, schrieb Bill Mudry:
When I tried this, I found more information on mysql_real_escape() at:
>
http://php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-real-escape-string.php
>
With this proof that it is a valid function, it is hard to understand the
error I got when I used your second sug
Hi Oliver,
Oliver wrote:
>
> Okay, thank you all again for your input, I have tried a number of
> suggestions to work out what is happening. Just to reiterate here is the
> search
> form which is on a different page.
> ...
Try the following code on your search page to display GET- and POST-vari
r help, this is the first time I have used this method to
obtain help and I have been very impressed with both the speed and quality of
the repsonse.
Kind Regards
Oliver
> From: aristotlek...@hotmail.co.uk
> To: harlequ...@gmx.de; php-windows@lists.php.net; php...@lists.php.net;
> robl.
1 - 100 of 1330 matches
Mail list logo
