On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've never tested the difference for performance. If that's the case, > any particular reason to stop support ISAPI for IIS then? or is > FastCGI faster than ISAPI for IIS? It is faster, however the ISAPI was not maintained and has issues. But what is the relation with Apache? > I've meant official in the sense that one could download from the > official/mirror site. Thus it's more trust worthy, in terms of non > malicious code. The developers at apachelounge.com work with th Apache project. We would not recommend to use it if we do not trust this project. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
