Well, considering that PHP is doing 10 times more CF, that's not bad...in fact, that's
pretty good But seriously, don't you think that's a bit skewed? Shouldn't they
both be running the same number of queries, just to be fair? :-)
Ignatius
> -Original Message-
> From: Chr
Hi!
What PHP version you have benchmarked?
>I was running some simple database performance tests this morning using PHP
and
>Cold Fusion using MS SQL on an NT box. On my first test, I did a number of
>select statements. To my surprise, Cold Fusion (using OLEDB) came in at 4
>seconds to PHP's 8.
