Well, considering that PHP is doing 10 times more CF, that's not bad...in fact, that's
pretty good.... But seriously, don't you think that's a bit skewed? Shouldn't they
both be running the same number of queries, just to be fair? :-)
Ignatius
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 10 March 2001 06:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-WIN] Benchmark humor
>
>
> I was running some simple database performance tests this
> morning using PHP and
> Cold Fusion using MS SQL on an NT box. On my first test, I
> did a number of
> select statements. To my surprise, Cold Fusion (using OLEDB)
> came in at 4
> seconds to PHP's 8. When I looked at the inner benchmark
> loops, I found the
> difference - PHP was doing 5,000 queries and Cold Fusion was
> doing 500.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
