Sébastien,
The Oracle 9.2.0 client is 64 bit, and you are compiling it with other
source code that is 32 bit. You must install the Oracle client 8.x
(which will connect fine against a 9.x database) and compile against
that to get around the problem.
--
Jim
>>> Sébastien Mortier <[EMAIL PROTECTE
The --with-apache builds PHP into the Apache source code
making it a little faster, but less flexibile (you need to
recompile Apache to add PHP modules, etc.)
The --with-apxs builds PHP as a DSO (kind of like a DLL),
so if you already have a binary install of Apache, you want
the --with-apxs optio
> > phpa has nothing to do with Apache though. I don't see any reason for
> > that to not work with the Apache 2 PHP module.
>
> http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/faq.php#apache2
So use a different one. That is a phpa problem, not a PHP one.
> > As for Apache2 being faster. Perhaps in some si
> > What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
> I read through the latest discussion on PHP GENERAL list. If there are
> some libs having problems, with thread-safetiy..., why not using a
> PHP-Installation without these libs? If they become tread-safe they can
> be add
> phpa has nothing to do with Apache though. I don't see any reason for
> that to not work with the Apache 2 PHP module.
http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/faq.php#apache2
> As for Apache2 being faster. Perhaps in some situations for static pages
> it is, but for dynamic pages it is hard to ma
Hi Rasmus!
> What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
I read through the latest discussion on PHP GENERAL list. If there are some libs
having problems, with thread-safetiy..., why not using a PHP-Installation without
these libs? If they become tread-safe they can be
> > What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
> Because Apache 2 itself is stable. So why using older, slower software? But
> you're right, I will use Apache 1.3.27 with PHPA(free PHP-Cache), this will
> be much faster than Apache 2 without cache.
phpa has nothing to do
I've tried it, works well, and just read a magazine article in a linux mag, which showed
it benchmarking on-par with Zend Cache, a very expensive commercial version.
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 09:21, Andreas Korthaus wrote:
> Excuse me , can you tell me what is a phpa and where i can do
> Excuse me , can you tell me what is a phpa and where i can download it ?
It's a PHP-Cache, similar to Zend_Cahce, but free.
http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/
Looks very nice, but I didn't test it yet. Does someone else her have experience with
it?
Andreas
__
KeyID: 0xC38C7298
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Korthaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-INST] Compile PHP into Apache 2.0 httpd(static)
Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23
Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23.01.03 11:30:22:
>
> > Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible
>with Apache 1.3?
> > How could I do this?
>
> You can't.
Hm :-(
> What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
Becaus
Andreas Korthaus wrote:
Hi!
Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible with Apache 1.3?
How could I do this?
If I want to use PHP 4.3 with Apache 2.0.44(DSO or static), it is decleard "experimantal". Is it realy that dangerous? I have never heard of any pro
> Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible with
>Apache 1.3?
> How could I do this?
You can't.
> If I want to use PHP 4.3 with Apache 2.0.44(DSO or static), it is
> decleard "experimantal". Is it realy that dangerous? I have never heard
> of any problems.
I will be sure to do an extra Hail Mary this Sunday.
-Ian
Quoting Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Divine intervention
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ian Miller wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > What customization do I need to do to get this to work together on a
> solaris
> > system.
> >
> > --
> > PHP Insta
Same thing. Stick with Apache 1.3.x at least until PHP 4.3, and
realistically much longer than that. Unless you are on Windows, it is
going to be a while before it makes sense to run PHP on Apache 2.0.
Apache 2.0 with the prefork mpm and PHP 4.3 should be pretty good. I
still wouldn't run any o
what about FreeBSD 4.6?
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Divine intervention
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ian Miller wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > What customization do I need to do to get this to work together on a solaris
> > system.
> >
> > --
> > PHP Install Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
Divine intervention
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ian Miller wrote:
>
>
> What customization do I need to do to get this to work together on a solaris
> system.
>
> --
> PHP Install Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
--
PHP Install Mailing List (ht
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Thomas Hove wrote:
> I'm running an Apache 1.3.19 with php 4.0.5 , mod_ssl/2.8.2 and
> openSSL/0.9.6 on a NT 4 platform.
>
> When I start the Apache server the following message appear :
>
> "Loaded DSO F:/php/sapi/php4apache.dll uses plain
> Apache 1.3 API, this module might
18 matches
Mail list logo
