> > phpa has nothing to do with Apache though. I don't see any reason for
> > that to not work with the Apache 2 PHP module.
>
> http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/faq.php#apache2
So use a different one. That is a phpa problem, not a PHP one.
> > As for Apache2 being faster. Perhaps in some si
> > What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
> I read through the latest discussion on PHP GENERAL list. If there are
> some libs having problems, with thread-safetiy..., why not using a
> PHP-Installation without these libs? If they become tread-safe they can
> be add
> phpa has nothing to do with Apache though. I don't see any reason for
> that to not work with the Apache 2 PHP module.
http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/faq.php#apache2
> As for Apache2 being faster. Perhaps in some situations for static pages
> it is, but for dynamic pages it is hard to ma
Hi Rasmus!
> What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
I read through the latest discussion on PHP GENERAL list. If there are some libs
having problems, with thread-safetiy..., why not using a PHP-Installation without
these libs? If they become tread-safe they can be
> > What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
> Because Apache 2 itself is stable. So why using older, slower software? But
> you're right, I will use Apache 1.3.27 with PHPA(free PHP-Cache), this will
> be much faster than Apache 2 without cache.
phpa has nothing to do
I've tried it, works well, and just read a magazine article in a linux mag, which showed
it benchmarking on-par with Zend Cache, a very expensive commercial version.
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 09:21, Andreas Korthaus wrote:
> Excuse me , can you tell me what is a phpa and where i can do
> Excuse me , can you tell me what is a phpa and where i can download it ?
It's a PHP-Cache, similar to Zend_Cahce, but free.
http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/
Looks very nice, but I didn't test it yet. Does someone else her have experience with
it?
Andreas
__
KeyID: 0xC38C7298
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Korthaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-INST] Compile PHP into Apache 2.0 httpd(static)
Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23
Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23.01.03 11:30:22:
>
> > Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible
>with Apache 1.3?
> > How could I do this?
>
> You can't.
Hm :-(
> What is your reason for picking Apache2 over Apache1.3 at this point?
Becaus
Andreas Korthaus wrote:
Hi!
Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible with Apache 1.3?
How could I do this?
If I want to use PHP 4.3 with Apache 2.0.44(DSO or static), it is decleard "experimantal". Is it realy that dangerous? I have never heard of any pro
> Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible with
>Apache 1.3?
> How could I do this?
You can't.
> If I want to use PHP 4.3 with Apache 2.0.44(DSO or static), it is
> decleard "experimantal". Is it realy that dangerous? I have never heard
> of any problems.
Hi!
Isn't it possible to compile php 4.3.0 static into Apache 2.0 as it is possible with
Apache 1.3?
How could I do this?
If I want to use PHP 4.3 with Apache 2.0.44(DSO or static), it is decleard
"experimantal". Is it realy that dangerous? I have never heard of any problems. If I
want to use
12 matches
Mail list logo
